HeroR wrote: Fri Aug 21, 2020 11:09 am
He was more than that since unlike most villains he didn't see himself as the villain or evil. The most he would admit to was that his actions were evil, but it were all for a good caused. Frieza nor any other villain in Dragon Ball up until him didn't try to justify their actions or pretend what they were doing was good. They were evil, proclaimed themselves as evil, and was proud of it.
He also wasn't supposed to be 'morally grey'.
It's fine not to be a fan of Zamasu, but the fact is he wasn't 'Bwahaha I'm evil' as you put it.
Doing something bad for a "good cause" is a form of moral ambiguity but even if you wanna say that Zamasu was just straight up bad do to how self absorbed he was, how does that make him any different from Freeza or Vegeta?
Vegeta -I'm The Saiyan Prince, I'm Better than you!
Freeza - I rule the universe, I'm better than you!
Cell - I'm the perfect life form, I'm better than you!
Zamasu - I'm a God, I'm better than you! but also everyone's wrong and I'm right so I'm gonna kill everyone to prove my point!
Sure, Zamasu has a more refined "motivation", his self delusion is just cranked to the max, so he appears to be a little different when he really isn't once you get past his constant speeches about how people are bad.
Sensui from YuYu Hakusho had the "Humans are bad" thing going on too but he's an infinitely more complex character than Zamasu could ever hope to be. Granted like you said saying Zamasu is the most complex DB Villain is like saying Chic Fil-A is the best fast food joint, not exactly high praise lol. Nothing wrong with being simple either though, I feel like a lot of folks are under the impression that if you cant relate to a villain or hero than that makes them less likable or fun to watch, which isn't true, people love Goku despite how simple he is.
Sometimes when writers try too hard to make someone deep or complex they lose any sense of authenticity to the character and thus their regression or progression as the story moves forward feels forced and unnatural which leads to a lot of (using a wrestling term here) "Go away heat" meaning you wanna see the character be written off not because he's the "bad guy" but because he's just unbearable to watch/listen too. Which a lot of people here seem to feel that way about Moro but I don't. I mean, this arc isn't perfect by a long shot but I've enjoyed most of it more than hated it.
The problem Toyotaro is having with Moro is that he seems to not know if he wants him to be simple or complex, so from an execution stand point he's in this weird middle ground where you can cause people to potentially lose a lot of interest.
Force of nature is a personality trait because Kid Boo didn't really have a personality.
Hurricanes, Tsunamis, Earthquakes and Black Holes are forces of Nature, none those occurrences have a personality though, they are phenomenons that transpire because that's just how things go, they aren't living beings. Boo is a sentient entity that is fully aware of what he does and chooses to do it.
According to modern info Boo has always just been around but he also wasn't always evil either, that just happened overtime. So maybe form an "existence standpoint" you can say he's a force of nature since he's always just kinda been there but he's apparently psychotic by nurture and not nature, despite his sporadic behavior, he can still think, he just doesn't do a lot of it or so it would appear.
It's not too late. One day, it will be.
Peace And Power MF DOOM!
Peace and Power Kevin Samuels