It's Dragon Ball, the vast majority of people watch this show for the fights and action, like all shonen really. If a Dragon Ball series can't nail down the fights, it shouldn't even bother. GT is a clear example of this. At least Super's got its priorities straight. It's not like it's a shallow or poor show just because its highlights are the fights, if anything it's a show that understands its audience.Matches Malone wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 9:08 amI should've used different wording. I was talking about the show as a whole, including the writing, ideas, characterizations, etc. Super's fights are definitely a highlight of the show, and the only reason I'd recommend it over GT, as GT's fights are pretty much non-existent.
Regardless the writing, ideas, and characterization are decent as well, I don't have any significant complaints in this regard.
You claim the desolate city of the Future Trunks arc grew tiresome, but all major fights in GT were based in a desolate city. Yes, even the Goku vs. Baby fight took place in a desolate city, because that's what the Tuffles world is, a wasteland. I enjoyed the settings of Super, especially in the Future Trunks arc, because even if the desolate city was perhaps overdone, there was one very interesting detail which redeemed it: the green sky. It really conveyed the idea of an apocalyptic, bleak future in a way that no other arc did. The sky and sun were literally blocked by the destruction and darkness. I also greatly enjoyed the various divine worlds like Gowasu's and Zamasu's planet in Universe 10, they were very pleasing aesthetically.Mad Swami wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 9:13 am I think those fights are great, but overall I think aesthetically Super is dog. Super's designs are fairly awful. The T.O.P ring is the most boring location in the entire franchise. The desolate city grew a bit tiresome, nothing in RoF looked good, and even some of the character designs in the T.O.P (including and somewhat targeting Jiren) were pretty bad.



