Yuji wrote: Sun Jul 18, 2021 6:16 pm
I'll make a neutral observation: Vegeta gaining God of Destruction powers feels uncharacteristic of Toriyama. Considering how in-line it is with the fandom's wishes, it comes across as a predictable development, one I wouldn't doubt was suggested by Toyotarou, who generally seems very in-touch with what the fandom wants and theorizes about. Toriyama himself is a lot more subversive, and this coupled with the fact that Beerus mentoring Vegeta had never been a proper plot beat in any arc previously (outside of their battle in the beginning of the ToP, but once again that strikes me as a Toyotarou development), it leads me to believe Toyotarou has a very big hand in the writing of this arc and, possibly, of Dragon Ball going forward.
This is a lot of conjecture, buoyed by a lie.
Since Battle of Gods in 2013, Beerus has had an interest in Vegeta. Throughout all of Super, Vegeta has not taken well to Whis’ training, preferring to do things his own way.
You may not like this plot point or whatever, but the seeds for it have been planted.
As for what Toriyama would do, you don’t know. That’s what being subversive means. This is the guy who created Super Saiyan 3 just to use it as a red herring for the Fusion plot point. You’re making baseless assertions based on one image. In the wrestling biz, we call this being a mark.
I don’t think this arc is any good, I don’t care for new transformations, and I mostly hate the Dragonball fandom for being a black hole for creativity, but if you’re gonna do this type of criticism, it needs to be more reasoned and more fact-based.