Uhh looks like the interview already got retconnedGrimlock wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:33 pm And then, of course, there's Toriyama himself saying it's possible to bring him back.

Uhh looks like the interview already got retconnedGrimlock wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:33 pm And then, of course, there's Toriyama himself saying it's possible to bring him back.

You shouldn't take this literally. Toriyama means they aren't together as a family, once in a while they should be in the same vicinity.Xeogran wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 4:23 pmUhh looks like the interview already got retconnedGrimlock wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:33 pm And then, of course, there's Toriyama himself saying it's possible to bring him back.![]()
![]()
Not another Bardock extramarital love theory...YamiGoku wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 9:02 pm Maybe Gas fell in love with Bardock, but then Bardock rejected him and broke his heart...![]()
Yes why not more?PurestEvil wrote: Wed Oct 27, 2021 2:59 amNot another Bardock extramarital love theory...YamiGoku wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 9:02 pm Maybe Gas fell in love with Bardock, but then Bardock rejected him and broke his heart...![]()
Freeza (in Ayers' voice): Thanks to that wild--haired monkey, I am saddled with unnecessary...feelings...dbgtFO wrote: Wed Oct 27, 2021 7:00 amYes why not more?PurestEvil wrote: Wed Oct 27, 2021 2:59 amNot another Bardock extramarital love theory...YamiGoku wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 9:02 pm Maybe Gas fell in love with Bardock, but then Bardock rejected him and broke his heart...![]()
Turns out the REAL reason Freeza destroyed Planet Vegeta wasn't because he feared a Saiyan uprising or the Super Saiyan.
It's because Bardock's ruggedly handsomeness made him feel a kind of way and so to rid himself of shameful thoughts, he saw no other way out than destroying the lot of them.
That's assuming Raditz is there to begin with.
Yes... or no. It depends on how you interpret Toriyama's sentence.
If #2 is so clearly retconned, I think its safe to say that #1 is as well, no interpretation necessary.Grimlock wrote: Wed Oct 27, 2021 1:41 pmYes... or no. It depends on how you interpret Toriyama's sentence.
However, the one thing that truly has been "retconned" is the "Saiyans kids don't play" information, since in that very panel you posted, we see Raditz playing.
Because this is how this particular author expands his story. But to your point, maybe we shouldn't adhere to these statements since they are frequently dropped or ignored.PurestEvil wrote: Wed Oct 27, 2021 5:41 pm How can an author’s comment be retconned when it is not a part of their actual story?
I'm calling it right now, Elec plans to gather the dragon balls to wish for, who the hell knows what, but NOT for Gas to become the strongest in the universe, but the clincher here is that Gas ALSO knows that Elec doesn't trust Gas's strength. It's a sore spot for him because of the humiliating defeat he was put through all those decades past. Elec knows Gas has gotten exponentially stronger since then, but he won't let Gas fight Granolah, because he doesn't want Gas to lose like that again. Gas knows his brother has lost faith in him as the strongman of the group, so, when Elec gathers the dragon balls and means to use them for whatever wish he had planned all along, Gas usurps the wish and wishes to be the strongest fighter in the universe, etc, etc.emperior wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 2:39 pmI have also thought of this scenario. It would be crazy.batistabus wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 2:14 pm Gas seems pretty confident in his abilities as they stand (despite that his confidence may be misplaced). He reacts to the Bardock encounter as if it was a fluke; that he has always been stronger. This is not necessarily a prediction, but if he had one wish, he could conceivably wish back Bardock so he could prove his superiority. Elec wouldn't permit that wish, and I'm definitely not on the "bring Bardock back to life" train, but that's my analysis based on the little we know about Gas.
But really, how can Gas be stronger than Goku, Vegeta and Granolah? That would be quite dumb.
And he also looked quite confident in the past, yet he lost to Bardock of all people. A low-class warrior. If he lost to Freeza, that would be another thing. But Bardock? Come on. Gas is just a delusional character.
I think if they really want to revive Bardock, maybe they will do it with a second wish by the Heeters. Say, Gas is powered up by a wish and is able to beat everyone also due to them being very tired from the fight, but they are able to escape through Goku teleporting them away,
Left alone on Cereal, and power-drunk, he decides to have revenge on Bardock and thus collects the DBs once again to revive him, maybe going against his family which might have planned to first power up Gas so that he can kill everyone and then allow them to collect the DBs without opposition, to get infinite wishes with the Dragon.
It kind of is, though. What did Toriyama mean by "together"? All three of them staring at Goku at the same time? If that's the case, then Toriyama's correct, all four of them were never together. When Raditz first saw Goku, Bardock was not there. Here's Bardock's first look at Goku, Raditz is not exactly there.BWri wrote: Wed Oct 27, 2021 5:31 pmIf #2 is so clearly retconned, I think its safe to say that #1 is as well, no interpretation necessary.
You should probably add that to your view of "canon": some people will take into consideration an author's comment, as if it's already established in the story and some will not.PurestEvil wrote: Wed Oct 27, 2021 5:41 pmHow can an author’s comment be retconned when it is not a part of their actual story?
I thought it was common sense throughout every fandom that an author’s extra-universal comments were technically not a part of a story because they were not incorporated into their workGrimlock wrote: Thu Oct 28, 2021 12:43 amYou should probably add that to your view of "canon": some people will take into consideration an author's comment, as if it's already established in the story and some will not.PurestEvil wrote: Wed Oct 27, 2021 5:41 pmHow can an author’s comment be retconned when it is not a part of their actual story?
It's part of my question "is there any rules?" as in: "is there a rule which state we should/shouldn't take into consideration an author's comment and apply it to the story?". But because we won't ever get a definitive answer on this, we're bound to have different views regarding this either.
S-Cells? Never mentioned in the series but people already use them to explain some of the transformations occurences.PurestEvil wrote: Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:42 am I thought it was common sense throughout every fandom that an author’s extra-universal comments were technically not a part of a story because they were not incorporated into their work
Well that's a shame, innit? Should've written that down earlier...Xeogran wrote: Thu Oct 28, 2021 8:32 amS-Cells? Never mentioned in the series but people already use them to explain some of the transformations occurences.PurestEvil wrote: Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:42 am I thought it was common sense throughout every fandom that an author’s extra-universal comments were technically not a part of a story because they were not incorporated into their work
Same with Lapis and Lazuli's names, only revealed through an Interivew.
Kanzenshuu doesn’t encourage common sense or consensus. It actually encourages you to have a conversation and expose your view as clear as you can be.PurestEvil wrote: Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:42 am I thought it was common sense throughout every fandom that an author’s extra-universal comments were technically not a part of a story because they were not incorporated into their work
Lapis and Lazuli are mentioned in DBZ Kakarot. I'd say their names are now beyond the point of being interview-only material.Xeogran wrote: Thu Oct 28, 2021 8:32 am Same with Lapis and Lazuli's names, only revealed through an Interivew.
Stuff like this is why I insist that the original creators are irreplaceable. They know the work in a way literally nobody else does. This is probably the most literal interpretation of that; literal rules that nobody but Toriyama would know.Mr Baggins wrote: Thu Oct 28, 2021 12:13 pm During his interview with Nakatsuru, Toriyama mentioned he routinely kept a lot of unwritten rules and notes in his head so as not to bog down the story with too much exposition.