Goku9001 wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 1:59 am
I agree this is the information we get. If we want to discern how Goku compares to Gohan i.e whether he's within the ballpark or simply much stronger, we would have to look elsewhere. Just like we would with Majin Vegeta to know how he exactly compares to Kid Gohan. I'm not sure what you mean by "the story would mention if they were wrong." The statement isn't invalidated even if Trunks was monumentally stronger than Gohan was.
If the intent is for Super Saiyan 2 Trunks to be matching a Goku who is astronomically stronger than his Boo arc self, why would Goku's comparison to Gohan only come out after Trunks transforms into SS2? He'd have been stronger than Cell Games-era Gohan the whole time. And in those shocking circumstances, the more relevant comment would have been Goku comparing Trunks to himself.
That's by far the more immediate way to signal things to the reader in that case.
The Trunks scene is really what locks in no super-strong Goku/Vegeta approach being taken in the manga for me--(which means, yes, you need to assume slightly different events in its "F" equivalent to fit with its "Battle of Gods" changes)--we get an SS2 Trunks compared favorably to SS2 Gohan, only after he transforms, using homage dialogue last used to signal an SS2 who was also in Cell Games era Gohan's ballpark.
Sure, it's possible that he and Goku are both still wildly stronger than Cell Games-era Gohan in that scene, but then you have to assume that Goku decides to wait for the transformation to reveal that for no great reason, that we're mean to ignore the dialogue similarity, and that Toyotaro doesn't think there's anything strange about asking all those assumptions of the reader when just about any other approach could make the magnitude of their strength more clear. It requires so much reading against the grain, when the more immediate reading would be "Toyotaro gives us a scene that implies SS2 Trunks and Goku are in the original-run SS2 ballpark, because that's what he meant to do."
Like
Skar, I don't have an issue with a super-duper strong Trunks showing up if the story wants to give us that. Just like I don't have an issue with the story telling us #17 and Freeza can make their infamous leaps in
Super. I don't have an issue with it telling us Gohan can catch up to Super Saiyan Blue characters in his small amount of training leading up to the ToP. But it makes those things clear. I'm just not one to assume we're ever meant to read a scene that far around what its dialogue and comparisons imply. I think the idea that Trunks and Goku are in range of the SS2s we see in the original series is made about as clear as anything, really.
Yuji wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 12:32 pm
If you had to interpret Resurrection F's events in the manga following the "Goku & co didn't get much stronger from the Boo arc onwards" paradigm, then how would you? How strong is Freeza in the manga and which forms did Goku use against him?
Base Freeza in the ToP seems outclassed by regular old Super Saiyans. At least stronger than Boo Super Saiyans, but still very weak nevertheless.
The manga is also not without its inconsistent scaling. SSB Vegeta after eating a senzu bean losing to SS Goku Black comes to mind.
The manga's a little wishy-washy on non-Golden Freeza's strength, but I wouldn't want to assume any deviations from the film so large as to give us a much weaker Freeza. That requires events to be
substantially different.
All that needs to change is base Goku vs. Freeza. I've seen a lot of people suggest SSG Goku vs. Freeza instead, which would definitely help bring it in line, but I think if it were up to me in an adaptation or something, I'd just skip straight to Blue vs. Golden (have Goku sense Freeza's power and figure Blue is needed from the get-go, with Freeza surprising him with Golden to accommodate), to save God's surprise usage/return in U6. I think it would be undercut by being used as a stepping stone in the previous story.
Re: The bolded bit: I don't know that I agree he's ever "outclassed." Caulifla just gives him a harder time than expected. He doesn't seem to be in any danger of losing to her, but she gets under his skin and he's the character most focused on not exerting extra effort besides Jiren. (If he has Golden under control, it's actually less effort to just steamroll with it than risking any remote struggle in a lower form.) He eats Caulifla's gigantic attack no worse for wear.
Goku9001 wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 4:04 am
We can't. Goku and Vegeta made significant gains during the Goku Black arc. Aside from that, I don't think Cabba would be capable of fending off the Pride Troopers the way Super Saiyan Goku could.
This is kind of external to any ongoing conversations, but for clarity: Neither Goku nor Vegeta are implied to have gotten significantly stronger in the Black arc (manga) outside of new uses for their transformations. The results of Vegeta's day in the Room of Spirit and Time are attributed entirely to his being able to do the rapid God-Blue switch (with Black even being confused by the fact that he doesn't seem to have gotten noticeably stronger, despite gaining the upper hand in their fight), and Goku spends his one day of training learning the Mafuba, then pulls out Completed Super Saiyan Blue as an untested experiment. They're stronger overall, by the end, but it's basically all attributed to learning how to use Blue more effectively, rather than becoming stronger across all their transformations in a traditional sense.
The Moro arc has the first training sequence in which Goku and Vegeta are unambiguously mentioned/shown to be stronger than they previously had been while in the same forms. (Or rather, first since their time in the RoSaT in the U6 arc, probably, although the results of that are kept ambiguous, and no one even references their having gotten particularly stronger.)
Skar wrote: Fri Jun 03, 2022 11:04 am
GreatSaiyaman123 wrote: Fri Jun 03, 2022 10:32 am
I think people are forcing this “what the author intended” a lot. And here’s a question that I saw fairly often in other discussions: Are you sure it’s not what
you want the author to have intended? At the end of the day, “stronger than Gohan” isn’t “just a little bit stronger” or “not stronger than anyone above Gohan”
That's interesting question to ask. I pointed out before that question is easier to answer based on if that fan has an extensive PL list or preconceived notion on how strong the characters should be. I've noticed only people have a reason to question any direct statement now is if they've already made up their minds and only interested in evidence that supports their view on the characters' strength.
People like Mr Baggins and Cipher made it clear they don't care how strong the characters are exactly and only going by how an author generally conveys information in a story. For example, I was on the fence about how strong the base Saiyans were by the Buu saga and didn't really mind either way so I was fine with accepting base Goku being weaker than Freeza. If Beerus confirmed base Goku was stronger than Freeza, I would be willing to accept that as well same with every other direct statement.
I'm just agreeing with
Skar again here, but I would certainly hope that my focus is on "what the author intended," because I don't particularly have skin in the game beyond that. I don't have an expectations that Trunks needs to be so-and-so-strong, etc.
I'll accept characters being as strong or weak as the story tells us they are, and then basically all of my power-discussion comments beyond that are looking for patterns in writing and presentation that help us fill in gaps on where they intended characters without direct commentary to be.
Whenever we get a statement like Beerus' on Goku and Freeza, I just go, "Oh, okay. So that was the intent. I could see reading base Goku as having been stronger too, but he wasn't, so no we can look at other question marks through that lens." And then I use that to frame how I look at other scenes/statements, etc. to fit with that general structure. It means sometimes I'll dismiss individual panels or small bits of action that don't seem to be intended to work as big "power-defining moments," since it's hard to make everything line up perfectly presentationally, but I think you can generally get a sense of where everyone stands across the two manga series based on what gets direct statements (and sometimes what doesn't), and then bringing everything in line around that. I don't really care where that lands any particular character. Why would I?
I've argued plenty against, say, Moro arc Piccolo being stronger than #17 in this thread, since I don't think anything in the scenes really gives us that to the level of clarity the series usually affords those kind of leaps, but if next month's chapter had someone say, "Hey, Piccolo, you're the strongest person on Earth after Gohan," or had him take out someone who had just hung #17 out to dry, my reaction would just be, "Okay! Glad that's cleared up." And I guess I'd be more likely to read the situational panel things people had used as evidence for that as being actual indicators moving forward. (But it's worth mentioning that as of this post none of that has happened. And with him getting a power-up and very clear general-ranking increase in
Super Hero (I'm assuming), the book will probably never be firmly closed on that one.)
Now, if fans want to argue that there's enough in-scene evidence to indicate that the author(s) might be "wrong" about the world/story as they've executed it, that's also a valid approach. It's just not the one I'm interested in. When I discuss power in DB, I'm pretty much always coming at it from the lens of, "Okay, how strong does the story (how strong does Toriyama/Toyotaro) want us to read this character as being, relatively?" Sometimes it doesn't have an exact answer at all, especially with very specific match-ups across different storylines, but I'd imagine they usually they have something in mind, and you can suss it out using direct statements as your footholds.
(Incidentally, the reason I'm less likely to ever engage with the
Super anime on that level is precisely because I don't think there was an overall uniform intention there to identify--you get the sense that Writer A might have had a different understanding of certain characters than Writer B (down to Goku and Vegeta themselves, at points), and indeed that was probably the case. I don't know that the series had any kind of Relative Strength Bible or someone dedicated to do script checks specifically through that lens. You can certainly engage in the exercise of putting all the pieces together to decide how it shakes out as its own finished series/fictional world--but without the author intentionality aspect it's just not really what I'm interested in. For this kind of discussion, I don't want to invent/decide the rules for the fictional world, so much as I want to identify the ones that are there.)