"Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
Saiyan007
Regular
Posts: 711
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 6:14 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Saiyan007 » Fri Nov 29, 2024 3:58 pm

Image

After Daima's episode today i would say this is pretty accurate. If base Goku could survive for some time against Tamagashi it would seem he's a lot stronger than he lets on

User avatar
Magnificent Ponta
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 966
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2020 2:25 pm
Location: Not on Tumblr, I guess

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Magnificent Ponta » Wed Dec 04, 2024 7:29 pm

Haven't seen this noted here, so I thought I would relay it for anybody's interest:

Apparently Victory Uchida and Toyotarou will be panel guests at Jump Festa, and Toyotarou will be doing a Goku illustration live.

Though he's done a number of pieces for key art and display year on year, I don't recall Toyotarou being a panel guest at Jump Festa before (by all means correct me if this recollection isn't right, I'm speaking offhand); speculatively, it seems an obvious opportunity to drop at least a hint about what future the Super Manga might have, since V-Jump is still taking the trouble to say it's on hiatus.

If literally nothing relevant comes out of this then the chances of a "proper" return probably take a pretty sharp dive - though perhaps they might not want to tread on Daima while it's still going, so that still might not be the end of it (unless, of course, they come out and say it is :lol:). But if Goku Day 2025 passes without anything being mentioned at all, I'd say the chances of anything more for the Super Manga (apart from maybe something like a special epilogue one-shot somewhere down the line) probably dip to around zero.

That would be fine - I think Chapter 103 is as fine an ending on the page as might have been hoped for, despite being unplanned - but it would be a bit of a whimper.

User avatar
Noah
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8276
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:56 pm
Location: Virtual World

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Noah » Tue Dec 10, 2024 10:25 pm

Gt91 wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2024 3:24 pm They are waiting for Daima to finish. After that, i think in March, they will probably continue with the manga.
How about continue the anime too? Even though I used to joke a lot about Toei ignoring Moro and Granola, I think it's finally time for those arcs to get animated. If they ignore them after Daima, maybe it's because they never took Toyotaro and his stories seriously (like I always thought)
乃亜

Top 10 DB/Z/GT Songs

Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?

User avatar
Vegard Aune
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1080
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:38 pm
Location: Norway

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Vegard Aune » Wed Dec 11, 2024 5:36 am

Wasn't there something about the ongoing rights dispute making it so that they literally can't touch the manga-exclusive content? Because I feel like if they can get that resolved, Moro and Granollah will absolutely get animated. For the simple and extremely cynical reason that it's more content that's already been written and that Toriyama had at least some hand in. From a marketing perspective it just makes sense. And like... the people making those calls? The marketing perspective is the only perspective they care about.

User avatar
SupremeKai25
I Live Here
Posts: 4658
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by SupremeKai25 » Wed Dec 11, 2024 2:17 pm

With animation, voice acting, and well-written Toei original content, the Moro arc will be peak animated Dragon Ball.

It's got everything. Lore and mystery, varied settings (not just the same desert wasteland all the time), fan-service for the side characters, a fulfilling and impactful climax, and Moro himeslf, a well-written and well-thought villain, with an interesting gimmick and charismatic personality.

It's so funny how the first and last Super original villain on the screen was Zamasu over 8 years ago.

I really want the Moro arc to be animated. I was very, VERY critical of this arc at first, but over the years, I have re-evaluated both Moro the villain and his arc.

The Granolah arc can be skipped though, LOL!
At his core Zamasu is good like Shin, though I guess you could say he was so fastidious that it backfired. But you know, for this "Future Trunks Arc" you had to depict Zamasu and Trunks' inner conflict, right? If this was back when I was drawing the manga myself then I doubt if I could have done it. I mean, I'm not very good at depicting the characters' psychology on the page. So this all came together because now I only have to think up the story. [...] On my own, I doubt I would have been able to express Zamasu's fall to the dark side.
Akira Toriyama, DBS vol.4 joint interview with Toyotaro

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4350
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Zephyr » Fri Dec 13, 2024 1:00 pm

The rights dispute certainly isn't preventing manga stuff from making it into games (which, as I understand it, were also on Iyoku's radar for Capsule Corp. Tokyo). Given that, Toyble's manga not being animated could be due more to a lack of interest than rights limbo.

User avatar
sangofe
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7918
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:39 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by sangofe » Fri Dec 13, 2024 1:18 pm

Zephyr wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 1:00 pm The rights dispute certainly isn't preventing manga stuff from making it into games (which, as I understand it, were also on Iyoku's radar for Capsule Corp. Tokyo). Given that, Toyble's manga not being animated could be due more to a lack of interest than rights limbo.
Oh yeah? Is there lists for what from the Super manga has been implimented into Sparking Zero?

User avatar
AtlasFlame18
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2019 3:30 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by AtlasFlame18 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 3:17 pm

Zephyr wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 1:00 pm The rights dispute certainly isn't preventing manga stuff from making it into games (which, as I understand it, were also on Iyoku's radar for Capsule Corp. Tokyo). Given that, Toyble's manga not being animated could be due more to a lack of interest than rights limbo.
I'm fairly certain it's a rights issue since Dokkan Battle, Legends and Heroes which has no issues pulling from every other part of the franchise do not have any of the characters or transformations from the manga only arcs.

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4350
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Zephyr » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:07 pm

sangofe wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 1:18 pm
Zephyr wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 1:00 pm The rights dispute certainly isn't preventing manga stuff from making it into games (which, as I understand it, were also on Iyoku's radar for Capsule Corp. Tokyo). Given that, Toyble's manga not being animated could be due more to a lack of interest than rights limbo.
Oh yeah? Is there lists for what from the Super manga has been implimented into Sparking Zero?
Not sure if anyone's compiled a list, but off the top of my head I know that one of Goku Black's attacks is from the manga, "Black Bind" (not sure if that's the official name or not).
AtlasFlame18 wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 3:17 pmI'm fairly certain it's a rights issue since Dokkan Battle, Legends and Heroes which has no issues pulling from every other part of the franchise do not have any of the characters or transformations from the manga only arcs.
Yeah, it definitely could be a rights thing. Maybe techniques and attacks are a sort of grey area? Or maybe they're getting slipped in under the radar.

User avatar
AtlasFlame18
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2019 3:30 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by AtlasFlame18 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:10 pm

Zephyr wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:07 pm
sangofe wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 1:18 pm
Zephyr wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 1:00 pm The rights dispute certainly isn't preventing manga stuff from making it into games (which, as I understand it, were also on Iyoku's radar for Capsule Corp. Tokyo). Given that, Toyble's manga not being animated could be due more to a lack of interest than rights limbo.
Oh yeah? Is there lists for what from the Super manga has been implimented into Sparking Zero?
Not sure if anyone's compiled a list, but off the top of my head I know that one of Goku Black's attacks is from the manga, "Black Bind" (not sure if that's the official name or not).
AtlasFlame18 wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 3:17 pmI'm fairly certain it's a rights issue since Dokkan Battle, Legends and Heroes which has no issues pulling from every other part of the franchise do not have any of the characters or transformations from the manga only arcs.
Yeah, it definitely could be a rights thing. Maybe techniques and attacks are a sort of grey area? Or maybe they're getting slipped in under the radar.
I think moves are allowed since that's how Gamma Burst Flash got into Sparking Zero

User avatar
Grimlock
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8517
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:11 pm
Location: Cybertron.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Grimlock » Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:20 pm

Zephyr wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 1:00 pm The rights dispute certainly isn't preventing manga stuff from making it into games (which, as I understand it, were also on Iyoku's radar for Capsule Corp. Tokyo). Given that, Toyble's manga not being animated could be due more to a lack of interest than rights limbo.
You're absolutely right in thinking that the "rights dispute" has nothing to do with preventing manga stuff from appearing in games. We have plenty of evidences just in the Dragon Ball franchise alone (Neko Majin, Gine, Jaco... all appeared in games prior to their debut appearances in a series). Expanding to other franchises, we see the same thing, Naruto's Baryon Mode, Luffy's Gear 5... They all began to receive merchandising and appearing in games after their debut in the TV series.

This has always been a thing, with a few expections, they wait for the appearance in the anime before appearing anywhere else. For some reason, after this "right dispute" came out, everyone just simply associated one thing to another out of nowhere.

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4350
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Zephyr » Fri Dec 13, 2024 5:18 pm

AtlasFlame18 wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:10 pmI think moves are allowed since that's how Gamma Burst Flash got into Sparking Zero
Right. But the notion that moves have a different sort of legal standing than forms or characters just seems a little odd. I mean, maybe they do and I don't know what I'm talking about. But I feel like anything original and unique to the manga should be in the same boat.

User avatar
AtlasFlame18
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2019 3:30 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by AtlasFlame18 » Fri Dec 13, 2024 5:24 pm

Zephyr wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 5:18 pm
AtlasFlame18 wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 4:10 pmI think moves are allowed since that's how Gamma Burst Flash got into Sparking Zero
Right. But the notion that moves have a different sort of legal standing than forms or characters just seems a little odd. I mean, maybe they do and I don't know what I'm talking about. But I feel like anything original and unique to the manga should be in the same boat.
I don't think we'll ever know the full story but seeing as Heroes was willing to take an obscure villain such as Majin Ozotto as their final boss while completely ignoring TUI, UE, Moro Corps, Granolah, Heeters, etc while adding in everything that showed up in the Super anime + movies leads me to believe that it has to be some type of legal technicality.

This is the same game that put in the fucking no name Barbarian from Universe 10 in its roster. They definitely would put in the new main villains if they could.

User avatar
Magnificent Ponta
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 966
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2020 2:25 pm
Location: Not on Tumblr, I guess

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Magnificent Ponta » Fri Dec 13, 2024 9:52 pm

Tiny Spoiler if you haven't seen Daima Episode 10, I guess

User avatar
Mr Baggins
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 885
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:23 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Mr Baggins » Sat Dec 14, 2024 12:09 am

Magnificent Ponta wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2024 9:52 pm If anybody knows of any earlier confirmation on this point, it'd be neat to see!
While not exactly official confirmation, Toyotaro appeared on a segment of JUMPolice in late 2017 where some attentive viewers noticed a couple of unused Angel and Kaioshin designs pinned to his office wall. They weren't in isolation – many of the finalized Angel/Kaioshin characters, also clearly appearing to be drawn by Toyotaro, were on those same design sheets.

Either that video isn't available anymore (sadly) or I can't find it. But you can still dig up websites and tweets of people mentioning it, and I believe Herms briefly covered the segment too.

Edit: here's an old Kanzenshuu thread with two screenshots of the video at the bottom of the OP. So yeah, it looks like they collaborated on all the divine races in the US/ToP arc.
Modern DB story arc scores:

User avatar
SupremeKai25
I Live Here
Posts: 4658
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by SupremeKai25 » Sat Dec 14, 2024 5:08 am

Uhm... is he not referring to the Supreme Kais who appeared in the Tournament of Power?

Yeah, quite clearly there is a DIRECT link between Super and Daima.
At his core Zamasu is good like Shin, though I guess you could say he was so fastidious that it backfired. But you know, for this "Future Trunks Arc" you had to depict Zamasu and Trunks' inner conflict, right? If this was back when I was drawing the manga myself then I doubt if I could have done it. I mean, I'm not very good at depicting the characters' psychology on the page. So this all came together because now I only have to think up the story. [...] On my own, I doubt I would have been able to express Zamasu's fall to the dark side.
Akira Toriyama, DBS vol.4 joint interview with Toyotaro

User avatar
Dragmobot12
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 123
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:56 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Dragmobot12 » Sat Dec 14, 2024 2:44 pm

I genuinely enjoy when people create their own content to entertain the community—sometimes it's quirky, other times it's great. As Jump Festa approaches, there's a lot of content circulating that could be misleading, often intended to be humorous, like this particular one that's already making the rounds. There’s still no official information on it, but I'd love to know what’s going on here, maybe there's a hidden joke or something, so if someone knows the original source of this peace, please clarify. Anyway, thanks in advance!

User avatar
Magnificent Ponta
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 966
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2020 2:25 pm
Location: Not on Tumblr, I guess

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Magnificent Ponta » Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:16 pm

Mr Baggins wrote: Sat Dec 14, 2024 12:09 amWhile not exactly official confirmation, Toyotaro appeared on a segment of JUMPolice in late 2017 where some attentive viewers noticed a couple of unused Angel and Kaioshin designs pinned to his office wall. They weren't in isolation – many of the finalized Angel/Kaioshin characters, also clearly appearing to be drawn by Toyotaro, were on those same design sheets.
Ah, thanks for this! So, apparently no official confirmation before now, but enough info out there for people to have pieced it together already so it doesn't come as much of a surprise now. Gotcha. Thanks again!
Mr Baggins wrote: Sat Dec 14, 2024 12:09 amEither that video isn't available anymore (sadly) or I can't find it. But you can still dig up websites and tweets of people mentioning it, and I believe Herms briefly covered the segment too.
I believe this is the JUMPolice segment in question; I went searching for it a few months back for other reasons - no English subtitles on this video, alas (Malay, it seems?), but at least a version of the segment is still out "in the wild" in case anybody wishes to refer to it and/or save it for posterity.
SupremeKai25 wrote: Sat Dec 14, 2024 5:08 am Uhm... is he not referring to the Supreme Kais who appeared in the Tournament of Power?

Yeah, quite clearly there is a DIRECT link between Super and Daima.
The indirect link I am referring to is that between Toyotarou and Daima (as in, he didn't directly work on Daima but his work has found its way into it), not Super and Daima (which are, as you say, directly linked thereby). Apologies for any unclarity and confusion here.

User avatar
Mr Baggins
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 885
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:23 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Mr Baggins » Sun Dec 15, 2024 1:50 am

No prob! Another thing that solidifies it for me is Whis, Vados, and Korn (the only Angels confirmed to have been designed by Toriyama) all being conspicuously absent from Toyotaro's design sheets in the video. I wonder if the one unused Angel shown there was replaced by Korn in pre-production.

It's kinda wild to think that Toyotaro actually designed most of the Angels, though I guess not terribly surprising. They definitely fit his style and approach.
Modern DB story arc scores:

User avatar
LoganForkHands73
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1445
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:54 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by LoganForkHands73 » Mon Dec 16, 2024 6:44 pm

I've seen some discussions about Goku's characterisation in Daima, and it reminded me of some old debates/discussions about the Granolah arc. This is very much an exercise in dragging some dusty skeletons out of the closet, but here goes nothing.

So, back when the controversial plot point of Granolah using the Cerealian Dragon Balls to wish to become the strongest in the universe was first revealed, there were rumbling questions of why Goku or any of the previous wishers wouldn't use them for the same thing. I always argued that even if Goku knew it was an option, he probably wouldn't do it except in the very gravest of circumstances, because he hates to undermine his own well-earned strength. A counter-argument was that he and Vegeta reluctantly resorted to Potara Fusion despite understanding that it would be permanent.

Goku is a naturally curious guy. Even though permanent fusion wasn't ideal, he was excited by the prospect of seeing just how strong a combination of him and Vegeta would be. When he finds the fusion bugs in the Demon Realm, he's similarly interested in eventually using them. In general, he's enthusiastic about many things throughout the adventure, which is quite refreshing to see. Like the audience, Goku likes fusion because it's cool, even if it's not the most "honest" way to increase his power. He smiles each time he's about to become Gogeta or Vegetto, whereas Vegeta scowls his usual scowl.

Using the Dragon Balls to wish for more power is the opposite of cool. It's boring, unimaginative and there are too many potential drawbacks, as Granolah and Gas both discover.

Post Reply