Yellow Flower King wrote: Thu Jan 08, 2026 10:31 pm
People complain about filler and bloated episode totals but if DB didn't have the amount of episodes it does, it would have never endured on like it did on tv. Sure Linear TV is DEADER THAN DEAD but back then having DB, DBZ and DB GT run on a strip like they did meant you could literally stumble upon a cool new random episode and have fun.
I disagree. Dragon Ball had running storylines & characters the audience grew to love & some pretty inventive storytelling as well as Toriyama's artstyle that evolved over the decade he wrote the manga. This is similar to the people who argue that the FUNimation English dub of Z, as produced, is why Z became popular rather than everything else. Toei produced the animes the way they did because that was the standard in Japan for decades. Seasonal television was always more of a Western thing & animes going for seasonal routes is still relatively new. Japan treats it more as "Produce content to make money off merch & keep the hype going by constantly having something on TV." And, I really don't mind a show running all the time if the quality stays up, but the way DBZ was produced was constantly being bottlenecked by the production schedules Toei was throwing at the people involved. Toei had at least 4-6 studios producing the animation for DB & Z, but because they started producing 2 movies a year, they put their best animators on those, which took a few of the best studios off episodes for large swaths of time & half of the remaining studios produced mostly dogshit quality animation for Z & even GT. A more flexible production schedule for the studios with less episodes would've allowed for higher quality & consistent animation, or at least for the episodes to be corrected for their worst shots. It doesn't help that the episodes were usually produced in, what, the 2-3 months before they aired?
I think Super & Daima also show how production schedules have heavily impacted the franchise. Super was rushed into production & produced some of the worst-looking episodes of the franchise, as well as I think the writing really took a hit because the Toei writing staff didn't have a great handle on some of the characters or how to execute some of the story bits. Though, by contrast, I felt like most of the arcs after the first 2 had decent pacing to them due to adapting a plot outline rather than a manga. Daima, by contrast, they took their time with the animation & it looks great as a result. The writing, I've heard, can fluctuate, but I assume it has more good than bad before the...last few episodes with the transformations, at least.
In regards to certain manga-based animes being seasonal & them taking forever to release new batches of episodes, that's an unfortunate side effect of the slowly-changing anime industry & definitely started by Attack on Titan in 2013, where they adapted RIGHT up until about where the manga was at the time &, because the author of the manga needed time to produce more chapters to adapt, they had to halt production of the show for a few years. However, because of how they produced the show the way they did, the first season at least had great pacing & animation (minus the weird moments where they just drew 1 frame & shook it to imply what was happening under the music, sound effects, & voice acting). Other shows I think greatly benefitted from being produced as they were are Death Note & Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood. Death Note had fantastic pacing that keeps you engaged & wanting to continue the binge...at least for the first arc because the second sucked ass. Brotherhood, likewise, had great pacing, even if they rushed adapting the first handful of chapters that they previously adapted in the original anime to get to the new stuff. And I've had even otherwise diehard fans of the original Z say to me that Kai cutting down the majority of the filler & padding genuinely improved the pacing of the arcs from removing them.
I think the best filler is stuff that doesn't bog down the pacing of a story to make people think their time's being wasted. I mean, look at the smaller mini-arcs of Super. Most people love them because they focus on characters that don't usually get the spotlight anymore & some of them actually inform things that happen in the bigger arcs even if they're not always the best-animated. I think that's the best use of those kinds of episodes that you can produce. That's why some fans will defend the filler that the Toei writers wrote for Gohan in the Saiyan arc, or the driving episode, or the Great Saiyaman filler in the Buu Arc. Hell, I even enjoy the Otherworld Tournament mini arc in Z because it's a lot of fun in 4 episodes.
However, when what feels like filler is bad, it's
bad in Dragon Ball, even passed the genuine padding. In GT, I fucking
hate the board game episodes in the Baby Arc. While things happen elsewhere & it's a different take on getting Goku out of the way so the villain can advance their plans which even Z did way too much, I can't stand the space raccoons, the board game isn't very fun to watch being played, & it lasts too goddamn long. Hell, even the Super 17 mini arc, I don't care for. It rips off Fusion Reborn, a lot of it doesn't make any sense even by Dragon Ball's sometimes wonky logic, a lot of the writing sucks, & some of the episodes are really poorly animated.
It all depends on writing, pacing, & production values. There's also a distinct difference between the filler meant to actually pad out time by adding useless nonsense in the middle of an actual moving story, which I think is what most people rag on Z for having, & the filler that's stuff that takes place between the next parts of stories after an end to a previous plot point before the next one. Unfortunately, it all gets thrown together by a lot of people, but there IS a distinction.