It definitely does work as an epilogue of sorts, in that it reveals character fates, but part of my point is that it's still not a story in itself. It's just lore we learn about in the abstract. The other part of my point is that much of this lore exists to explain where the game's playable races and classes come from. It's there to contextualize gameplay, as is the norm for video games.Skar wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 1:50 pmI think DBO works as kind of epilogue and similar to GT's ending. After taking care of all the major threats in the universe, the main cast lives out the rest of their lives in peace. I feel that's how almost every shonen series ends that allows the characters to age. The universe isn't going to keep conjuring up stronger and stronger villains forever. Eventually they'll face off against the strongest villain of their story and not much left after that. In DBO, it showed the only threat they faced in their lifetime was some remnants of Freeza's army then it took a few hundred years for a real threat to emerge.
Does that make the lore bad or unfitting? Does that mean it isn't still what Toriyama had in mind for character fates? No, not necessarily. They are still character fates cooked up by the man himself. But I personally don't think it was ever meant to be much more than context for a video game, and were Toriyama around long enough to actually write stories taking place around Age 800, I wouldn't have been remotely surprised if it contradicted a ton of what DBO said. Just like how Daima's new lore contradicted a ton of lore that Toriyama had previously said in interviews about Kaioshin and the Demon Realm.
Definitely disagree there. It does feel much more like strictly an epilogue now, with Super and Daima in the mix, but it is still the conclusion of the Boo arc. Goku leaves to train and fight with the reincarnation of the foe he vanquished and asked for a rematch with just two chapters prior. Anyone doing a read/watch through who doesn't read/watch it before moving onto Daima, Super, or whatever, is just as much my enemy as someone who skips the first six story arcs lol.MasenkoHA wrote: Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:26 pmI guess, for me, it’s like…the epilogue is just that…an epilogue. The meat and potatoes of the story ends when Goku obliterates Majin Boo. We get the further adventures of Goku and friends with Super and Daima so…so what if it’s before the 10 years later epilogue? It’s still after the last main event of the original manga. I know interquel stories can be frustrating because there’s a status quo to maintain. This is what made those Disney “sequels” that usually took place in the middle of the original movie so annoying when I was a kid. By their nature they can’t have actual stakes because the story has to work without them. The Fox and the Hound still got to be friends because they didn’t have a falling out until they were adults. But Dragon Ball Super in particular doesn’t seem all that concerned with if it contradicts the manga’s ending or not. They’ll pay lip service by referring to Oob’s God ki (however that works?) or Gohan still being a nerd and studying in Super Dee Duper Hero but that’s about it. 10 years of peace and not seeing much of each other since Boo was defeated is all thrown out the window. Super is already a sequel to Z that just happens to take place “before the epilogue” that might as well not exist in Super’s canon at this point.
And you can call the Oob stuff "lipservice", but they didn't have to do that. The 28th Tenkaichi Budokai still happens after Super, and contradictions truly extremely do not matter, especially in a story like Dragon Ball.


