[Theory] The definitive proof that Future Goku NEVER learned Instant Transmission

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.
vilker
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 11:12 am

Re: [Theory] The definitive proof that Future Goku NEVER learned Instant Transmission

Post by vilker » Wed Feb 18, 2026 4:55 pm

DanielSSJ wrote: Wed Feb 18, 2026 2:44 pm
vilker wrote: Wed Feb 18, 2026 6:27 am
Not going to address all of this, but:

1. There isn't a perfect translation of the manga available (Viz is noticably imperfect), and I can't read Japanese. Steve Simmons' subtitles are generally accepted as the best official translation Dragon Ball's ever relieved, and Piccolo's dialogue matched up well enough to the only translation of the manga available to me ["But how could you not know about my powers of regeneration? You have my cells."], so I figured it was probably correct.

2. Regarding the computer, regardless of how much of a genius Gero is, his computer was left alone in a cave for over 20 years. If it got a little humid, or if there were a power surge or outage, or an earthquake, yeah, something could've been lost.

3. Yes, Bluma is a scatterbrain. She's an engineering genius, but she's also prone to lapses in common sense, like when she accidentally blew up Nappa's spaceship in the previous arc. So yeah, I could easily imagine a scene of Future Bluma watching Trunks disappear and then immediately going "Shit, Goku got there early because he teleported in, didn't he?"

4. The whole point of this post was that there's no logical, in-universe answer for Cell not knowing that Goku could teleport, and your ultimate answer is that Future Trunks B selected a different, earlier year to return to the past for no logical, in-universe reason.

They're all just oversights. The Cell arc is the most ambitiously complex plot Toriyama's ever attempted in Dragon Ball, and he struggles to execute it. This isn't even a dig at Toriyama. Time travel plots are hard to get right when you have ample time to fine-tune them, and Toriyama was having to come up with the story every week, with former and current editors requesting changes to the plot as he's writing it. So yeah, I do think Cell and Trunks not knowing about Goku's teleportation is just an oops with no in-universe explanation.
I think we have reached the end of the road here. We fundamentally disagree on how to interpret a story, but I will concede one major point to you: Toriyama is not perfect, and Dragon Ball is full of genuine mistakes.

You are absolutely right that he wrote by the seat of his pants and made blunders.

Editor Mandates: Trunks originally naming #19 and #20 instead of #17 and #18? Yes, that was an abrupt change forced by his editors.

Continuity Errors: Cell getting his upper half obliterated by Goku, only to later claim his nucleus is in his head? Yes, that is a classic, undeniable Toriyama mistake.

But here is the crucial difference: Complicating a plot unnecessarily is not an 'accident'.

You prefer to explain the plot holes by stacking 'In-Universe Accidents':

The Magic Glitch: Gero's computer suffered 'humidity' that corrupted only the Instant Transmission file, but left complex DNA (Frieza, Piccolo, Saiyans) intact.

The Incompetent Genius: You equate a comedic gag with Bulma's life's work. She recorded the ship's landing coordinates. If Goku teleported, recording the ship's location is nonsensical. You are asking us to believe the smartest woman on Earth forgot the most miraculous event of her life.

The Illogical Trip: You admit there is no in-universe reason for Trunks to travel to Age 763 when the easiest logical path was to travel to 767 directly.

I prefer to explain it with 'Authorial Intent (Retcon)':
If Toriyama just made a mistake or wanted a simple villain, the easiest, zero-effort route was for Cell to arrive in Age 767. Simple, clean, no plot holes.
Instead, Toriyama forced a date (763) that made no sense for Trunks. He created a convoluted excuse about Cell 'not fitting in the machine', forcing him to revert to an egg and spend 4 years buried underground.
Come on, let's be real: you cannot call a 4-year underground incubation plot an 'oversight'. That is a blatant, highly specific narrative patch. It was a deliberate attempt to justify the Instant Transmission plot hole and every other anomaly.

In fact, I'd bet money that Toriyama had a twist like this in mind the moment Trunks returned and realized the Androids were different (#19 and #20). That whole 'mystery' vibe—the realization that history was profoundly off-track—screams that Toriyama wanted a hidden root cause altering the timeline long before the Androids arrived.

The Method & The Fix:

Toriyama wanted to showcase Trunks' power against Frieza. For this to work, Trunks had to be unaware of IT; otherwise, he would have waited for Goku.

Toriyama realized that if Trunks didn't know the move, it meant it was never used in his history. But chronologically, Goku should have known it.

To solve this, he forced Cell's machine to Age 763. Cell's Egg represents the Primary Bifurcation. Because of Cell arriving in 763, the timeline split earlier. Every time a timeline splits, quantum randomness takes effect ("re-rolling the dice"). This explains the butterfly effects: stronger Androids, delayed virus, and a different training path for Goku (learning IT).

Conclusion:
You view the Cell Arc as a pile of mistakes where machines break due to humidity and people forget things.
I view the Cell Arc as Toriyama's complex attempt to retroactively fix his own loose ends by inserting a root cause (Cell in 763).

If you are satisfied believing that the ultimate biological weapon just had a hard-drive error due to bad weather, that is fair! It's certainly the easiest explanation. But I find the 'Time Travel Causality' explanation much more rewarding and consistent with the manga's events.

User avatar
DanielSSJ
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1765
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:13 am
Location: Florida
Contact:

Re: [Theory] The definitive proof that Future Goku NEVER learned Instant Transmission

Post by DanielSSJ » Wed Feb 18, 2026 10:21 pm

vilker wrote: Wed Feb 18, 2026 4:55 pm I think we have reached the end of the road here. We fundamentally disagree on how to interpret a story, but I will concede one major point to you: Toriyama is not perfect, and Dragon Ball is full of genuine mistakes.

You are absolutely right that he wrote by the seat of his pants and made blunders.

Editor Mandates: Trunks originally naming #19 and #20 instead of #17 and #18? Yes, that was an abrupt change forced by his editors.

Continuity Errors: Cell getting his upper half obliterated by Goku, only to later claim his nucleus is in his head? Yes, that is a classic, undeniable Toriyama mistake.

But here is the crucial difference: Complicating a plot unnecessarily is not an 'accident'.

You prefer to explain the plot holes by stacking 'In-Universe Accidents':

The Magic Glitch: Gero's computer suffered 'humidity' that corrupted only the Instant Transmission file, but left complex DNA (Frieza, Piccolo, Saiyans) intact.

The Incompetent Genius: You equate a comedic gag with Bulma's life's work. She recorded the ship's landing coordinates. If Goku teleported, recording the ship's location is nonsensical. You are asking us to believe the smartest woman on Earth forgot the most miraculous event of her life.

The Illogical Trip: You admit there is no in-universe reason for Trunks to travel to Age 763 when the easiest logical path was to travel to 767 directly.

I prefer to explain it with 'Authorial Intent (Retcon)':
If Toriyama just made a mistake or wanted a simple villain, the easiest, zero-effort route was for Cell to arrive in Age 767. Simple, clean, no plot holes.
Instead, Toriyama forced a date (763) that made no sense for Trunks. He created a convoluted excuse about Cell 'not fitting in the machine', forcing him to revert to an egg and spend 4 years buried underground.
Come on, let's be real: you cannot call a 4-year underground incubation plot an 'oversight'. That is a blatant, highly specific narrative patch. It was a deliberate attempt to justify the Instant Transmission plot hole and every other anomaly.

In fact, I'd bet money that Toriyama had a twist like this in mind the moment Trunks returned and realized the Androids were different (#19 and #20). That whole 'mystery' vibe—the realization that history was profoundly off-track—screams that Toriyama wanted a hidden root cause altering the timeline long before the Androids arrived.

The Method & The Fix:

Toriyama wanted to showcase Trunks' power against Frieza. For this to work, Trunks had to be unaware of IT; otherwise, he would have waited for Goku.

Toriyama realized that if Trunks didn't know the move, it meant it was never used in his history. But chronologically, Goku should have known it.

To solve this, he forced Cell's machine to Age 763. Cell's Egg represents the Primary Bifurcation. Because of Cell arriving in 763, the timeline split earlier. Every time a timeline splits, quantum randomness takes effect ("re-rolling the dice"). This explains the butterfly effects: stronger Androids, delayed virus, and a different training path for Goku (learning IT).

Conclusion:
You view the Cell Arc as a pile of mistakes where machines break due to humidity and people forget things.
I view the Cell Arc as Toriyama's complex attempt to retroactively fix his own loose ends by inserting a root cause (Cell in 763).

If you are satisfied believing that the ultimate biological weapon just had a hard-drive error due to bad weather, that is fair! It's certainly the easiest explanation. But I find the 'Time Travel Causality' explanation much more rewarding and consistent with the manga's events.
The only thing I want to add is that the whole rigamarole with Cell arriving early and reverting to an egg to fit in the time machine gave Toriyama the excuse to have a creepy horror/mystery sub plot in the arc, with Bluma, Trunks, and Gohan investigating the other time machine and finding Cell's discarded cicada shell, and that the specific year was picked at semi-random (ala the M_ 17th conundrum that ended up corrected in other versions)
My Official Unofficial Battle Power list (in-progress: updated 11/8/2022—FREEZA ARC COMPLETED)

vilker
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 11:12 am

Re: [Theory] The definitive proof that Future Goku NEVER learned Instant Transmission

Post by vilker » Thu Feb 19, 2026 4:08 am

DanielSSJ wrote: Wed Feb 18, 2026 10:21 pm
The only thing I want to add is that the whole rigamarole with Cell arriving early and reverting to an egg to fit in the time machine gave Toriyama the excuse to have a creepy horror/mystery sub plot in the arc, with Bluma, Trunks, and Gohan investigating the other time machine and finding Cell's discarded cicada shell, and that the specific year was picked at semi-random (ala the M_ 17th conundrum that ended up corrected in other versions)
I completely agree that Toriyama wanted to introduce a creepy horror/mystery subplot (the cicada shell and the rusted time machine are classic Toriyama 'Rule of Cool' elements).

However, calling the choice of Age 763 'semi-random' ignores the mathematical precision of that specific date. It is literally the only possible window Toriyama could have chosen to make the story work. It is the 'Goldilocks Zone' of the Dragon Ball timeline:

The Impossibility of it being 'Semi-Random':
If Toriyama was just picking a random year to give Cell time to grow, why 763?

If he picks 761 or 762: Cell arrives before or during the Namek Saga. The Butterfly Effect would interfere with the Frieza fight or the use of the Dragon Balls.

If he picks Age 764: Goku has already returned to Earth, Frieza is already dead by Trunks' hands, and the timeline is already set.

Age 763 is the EXACT and ONLY blind spot. It happens right after Namek is resolved, but while Goku is isolated in space learning Instant Transmission. It is far too convenient and structurally perfect to be a 'semi-random' error. It is the exact surgical insertion point needed to alter Goku's training path without breaking the previous arc.

Trunks explicitly confirms the Butterfly Effect:
I think you mentioned earlier that it's hard to square how a buried larva could cause timeline changes. But you are arguing against the manga's own dialogue.
When Trunks and the others discover the truth about the second Time Machine, Trunks explicitly states that this event (Cell's arrival) is what distorted history.
Toriyama uses Trunks as his mouthpiece to tell the audience directly: 'This is why the Androids are different. This is why history changed and this is why every Trunks' surprises'.
If Toriyama didn't intend for Cell's arrival to be the main cause of the timeline changes, he wouldn't have written Trunks explicitly blaming it for the distortions.

Conclusion:
Yes, Toriyama wanted a cool mystery subplot. But the mechanics he used to execute it (Age 763 + Butterfly Effect) perfectly seal the plot holes regarding Goku's abilities and the Androids' differences.

Even if we assume Toriyama just 'had incredible luck' with his semi-random date... that 'luck' created a perfect in-universe explanation, which was then given continuity by deliberately removing Cell's ability to use Instant Transmission while still allowing him to use Frieza's techniques.

I choose to follow the manga's explicit explanation (Trunks confirming the timeline distortion) rather than assuming everyone forgot everything, computers broke down, and pure randomness miraculously picked the single most important key date.

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7970
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: [Theory] The definitive proof that Future Goku NEVER learned Instant Transmission

Post by dbgtFO » Fri Feb 27, 2026 12:56 pm

As far as theories go, I do think it fits.
Toriyama with all his whims, particularities and absurdities might very well have intended for Cell's arrival and therefore further splintering of established history as being the cause for everything turning out differently, even the event that isn't explixitly speculated in-universe to be the effect of that.

Much like with at times absurd powerscaling, I have accepted him not being a 100% super consistent, flawless logic level writer and with time distortions, the absurd is more accepted.

So yeah it can work.
Just underlines what a shame it is, that he never went back and gave us a full breakdown on what really happened in all the other timelines.
I'd honestly have preferred the Trunks special to be a 3 parter, with the 1st part covering Mecha Freeza vs Goku and co. followed by Goku's death by heart virus(perhaps even an origin point for the virus?)
2nd part being the 1st confrontation with the androids and how all safeguards were removed(no Dragon Balls, no contact to Namek etc.) And then the final part just being the story we got with Trunks and Gohan.

vilker
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 11:12 am

Re: [Theory] The definitive proof that Future Goku NEVER learned Instant Transmission

Post by vilker » Sat Feb 28, 2026 11:05 am

dbgtFO wrote: Fri Feb 27, 2026 12:56 pm As far as theories go, I do think it fits.
Toriyama with all his whims, particularities and absurdities might very well have intended for Cell's arrival and therefore further splintering of established history as being the cause for everything turning out differently, even the event that isn't explixitly speculated in-universe to be the effect of that.

Much like with at times absurd powerscaling, I have accepted him not being a 100% super consistent, flawless logic level writer and with time distortions, the absurd is more accepted.

So yeah it can work.
Just underlines what a shame it is, that he never went back and gave us a full breakdown on what really happened in all the other timelines.
I'd honestly have preferred the Trunks special to be a 3 parter, with the 1st part covering Mecha Freeza vs Goku and co. followed by Goku's death by heart virus(perhaps even an origin point for the virus?)
2nd part being the 1st confrontation with the androids and how all safeguards were removed(no Dragon Balls, no contact to Namek etc.) And then the final part just being the story we got with Trunks and Gohan.
Thanks! I completely agree. Toriyama wasn't writing hard sci-fi; the 'time distortion' caused by Cell's arrival is the perfect narrative umbrella he used to make everything fit.
​To build on your great idea of that 1st part (Mecha Frieza vs. Goku & Co.), here is my definitive take on how they actually survived those 3 hours without Goku using Instant Transmission:
​The Missing Link: The 3-Hour Survival
Frieza didn't just sit and wait patiently. He recognized Piccolo from Namek and knew that killing him would destroy the Earth's Dragon Balls (his chance at immortality). Instead of blowing up the planet, Frieza tortured Piccolo to get the information.
During this desperate struggle, Gohan and Tien Shinhan were actually killed by Frieza.
​When Goku finally landed in his ship (3 hours later, without IT), he stepped out to find Piccolo tortured and his own son dead. That absolute shock and extreme rage did two crucial things:
​It gave Goku the ruthless drive to instantly obliterate Frieza and King Cold without mercy or second chances.
​That massive spike of stress and explosive anger is exactly what prematurely awakened and accelerated his heart virus.
​After the battle, they simply gathered the Earth's Dragon Balls and used Shenron to resurrect Gohan and Tien.
​It perfectly explains why Goku didn't need IT, how they survived the wait, why Gohan was alive later to fight the Androids, and it adds a dark, tragic origin to the heart virus triggering. Seeing this exact sequence in a 3-part special would have been absolute peak Dragon Ball!

Post Reply