Jesus Christ, I'm about to make a post that
really has nothing to do with Dragon Ball lol
kiarasuraru wrote: Tue Apr 21, 2026 10:14 pm
And Yuyama was plain and simply wrong, and Ash's entire character and journey suffered from it. Ash being 10 years was never the issue, not knowing what a Pokemon Master was never it either, and let's be honest, let's not pretend that they didn't come up with what definition for "Pokemon Master" until after they decided Journeys was when he had to go so it's not like not knowing what it meant impeded anything either, never letting actually win and genuine progress was always is, and by the time it happened it was too little too late.
Feels like you got XY and SM reversed if anything. Genuinely have no idea how you went through XY and thought there was no build-up for Ash to finally win the League but thought there was in SM. Don't even know what you're referring to with "proper support" either. Hell, we even know now for a fact thanks to the Teraleak that Yuyama was gonna double down and make Ash lose the Alola League so him winning that one was not planned at all.
Satoshi plays the role of a battle shounen protagonist in XY, but he doesn't actually grow as a character because his arc exists in that framework. He had more reason to wind in his sails during DP—Satoshi's battle with Shinji should have been the final match of the Shin-ou League. Meanwhile, the focus on life, death and family in Sun & Moon gave Satoshi far more reason to win the League there.
The wording from the Teraleak is really vague about
Yuyama's involvement in having Satoshi win the Alola League. We know that he was initially against it, but that doesn't actually say anything about things like the timing of when decisions were made. Since Sun & Moon's first episodes were being animated six-ish months before they premiered, the backlash to the Kalos League's ending would have obviously not had an effect on those earlier episodes, but that still leaves two-plus years for the series to be geared to Satoshi winning.
Which, like...yeah? Alan winning the Kalos League felt like the telegraphed conclusion because of the scale of his story arc as a rival in the series being bigger than even Shinji's had been in DP. Whether Satoshi was going to win any of the League at any point was something that would have been decided upon six-plus months in advance of broadcast because of the series' involved production.
My own personal opinion is mostly just that I've never actually hated any of the League endings. Well, the Hou-en League is this weird League that is a big nothing burger, but I honestly didn't mind Takuto defeating Satoshi in the Shin-ou League because he clearly only existed because Sutou, Asada and Tomioka were told, "Nah, Satoshi doesn't need to win" and then for the Isshu League Sutou and Tomioka were told no again, so Tomioka didn't bother to script the ending of the League himself and Fujita made Satoshi's loss intentionally dumb as hell as a "fuck you" to Yuyama, so I can't really blame him for that.
Honestly, if there's one ending to a tournament that I didn't really care for, it was Satoshi winning the Masters Tournament. Dande's really bland, but I would have preferred Satoshi to lose or at the very least, lost his first title defense. Alas.
***
Okay, okay, let me try to make this mildly on-topic to Dragon Ball: just actually fully make Gokuu into Satoshi and let story arcs actually be vehicles for other characters to be the protagonist. This is how the Future Trunks arc
almost felt in the anime, anyway, and Jiren, Freeza, #17, Caulifla and Kale were ostensibly this during the Tournament of Power.
Is it bad that Gokuu sucks and never develops into an interesting character whose actions are held against him and cause permanent change to him and the story? Yes. Is that ever going to change? Probably not, so roll with the punches and develop other characters, like Broly.
At the end of the day: commercial art all fucking sucks and should be launched into the sun.