"Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread

Discussion of all things related to Dragon Ball video games (console and portable games, arcade versions, etc.) from the entire franchise's history.
User avatar
Scsigs
I Live Here
Posts: 4068
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 3:55 am
Location: NY, USA
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Scsigs » Sat Jun 27, 2026 3:05 am

The Dark Knight wrote: Fri Jun 26, 2026 9:04 am
Scsigs wrote: Wed Jun 24, 2026 10:57 pm
The Dark Knight wrote: Mon Jun 22, 2026 1:04 am Dragon Ball has no canon.
Yes it does. The manga.
Of course; I was talking more about everything else, as that seems to be what the vast majority of canon debates revolve around.
Yeah, but people who talk about "canon" in DB talk about it like certain Doctor Who fans talk about canon, where they count EVER ancillary piece of expanded universe media even though the show largely ignores everything outside of most of Paul McGann's stuff in Big Finish. I personally go with the multiple timelines theory for DB because that's just what makes the most sense & certain things like the games have made that pretty explicit that that's what they're going with, especially since everything produced since Battle of Gods quietly ignores that GT exists since they're incompatible & Daima just completely ignored the fact that it's incompatible in multiple ways with the timeline presented in Super, plus Super & Daima completely ignore that they're incompatible with the ending of the manga. So, y'know...

I think at this point most fans think of these thinks the same way since eve a casual fan would be able to pick these things up even passively.
Only dubs that matter are DB, Kai, & Super. Nothing else.
https://www.youtube.com/user/Scsigs
https://linktr.ee/Scsigs

djh1991
Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:07 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread

Post by djh1991 » Sun Jun 28, 2026 5:49 pm

Yeah, I already know that the History of Trunks has a manga.

User avatar
Scsigs
I Live Here
Posts: 4068
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 3:55 am
Location: NY, USA
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Scsigs » Mon Jun 29, 2026 11:12 pm

djh1991 wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 5:49 pm Yeah, I already know that the History of Trunks has a manga.
What?
Only dubs that matter are DB, Kai, & Super. Nothing else.
https://www.youtube.com/user/Scsigs
https://linktr.ee/Scsigs

User avatar
PhantomSaiyan
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 459
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:32 pm
Location: A Dark Future

Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread

Post by PhantomSaiyan » Tue Jun 30, 2026 2:21 am

Scsigs wrote: Mon Jun 29, 2026 11:12 pm
djh1991 wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 5:49 pm Yeah, I already know that the History of Trunks has a manga.
What?
Image

User avatar
Noah
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8361
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:56 pm
Location: Virtual World

Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Noah » Thu Jul 02, 2026 7:22 pm

I wonder if a GT DLC is that unlikely? I mean, it can always rely on SSJ4 popularity lol
乃亜

Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread

Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?

User avatar
Scsigs
I Live Here
Posts: 4068
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 3:55 am
Location: NY, USA
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Scsigs » Fri Jul 03, 2026 9:08 pm

Noah wrote: Thu Jul 02, 2026 7:22 pm I wonder if a GT DLC is that unlikely? I mean, it can always rely on SSJ4 popularity lol
This has been said by now multiple times.
The game pretty much JUST sticks to what Toriyama either wrote, or had a hand in. This means: The manga, the 2 Z TV specials (even though he rebooted Bardock in Minus, but there's barely anything there to adapt, so I get it), Battle of Gods, Resurrection F, & Daima. Toriyama had no involvement in GT outside of some early character & other designs. It'd be more likely for them to adapt the rest of Super, or the earlier arcs of the manga before the last tournament before the Saiyan Arc. I'd be very surprised if they did GT DLCs, tbh.
Only dubs that matter are DB, Kai, & Super. Nothing else.
https://www.youtube.com/user/Scsigs
https://linktr.ee/Scsigs

User avatar
PhantomSaiyan
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 459
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:32 pm
Location: A Dark Future

Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread

Post by PhantomSaiyan » Sat Jul 04, 2026 6:52 am

Scsigs wrote: Fri Jul 03, 2026 9:08 pm This has been said by now multiple times.
The game pretty much JUST sticks to what Toriyama either wrote, or had a hand in. This means: The manga, the 2 Z TV specials (even though he rebooted Bardock in Minus, but there's barely anything there to adapt, so I get it), Battle of Gods, Resurrection F, & Daima. Toriyama had no involvement in GT outside of some early character & other designs. It'd be more likely for them to adapt the rest of Super, or the earlier arcs of the manga before the last tournament before the Saiyan Arc. I'd be very surprised if they did GT DLCs, tbh.
If they made an exception for Bardock, I don't see why they couldn't make an exception for GT as well. That one Bardock dlc single handledly disproves the point that they only do purely Toriyama stuff.

User avatar
Scsigs
I Live Here
Posts: 4068
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 3:55 am
Location: NY, USA
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Scsigs » Sat Jul 04, 2026 11:01 am

PhantomSaiyan wrote: Sat Jul 04, 2026 6:52 am
Scsigs wrote: Fri Jul 03, 2026 9:08 pm This has been said by now multiple times.
The game pretty much JUST sticks to what Toriyama either wrote, or had a hand in. This means: The manga, the 2 Z TV specials (even though he rebooted Bardock in Minus, but there's barely anything there to adapt, so I get it), Battle of Gods, Resurrection F, & Daima. Toriyama had no involvement in GT outside of some early character & other designs. It'd be more likely for them to adapt the rest of Super, or the earlier arcs of the manga before the last tournament before the Saiyan Arc. I'd be very surprised if they did GT DLCs, tbh.
If they made an exception for Bardock, I don't see why they couldn't make an exception for GT as well. That one Bardock dlc single handledly disproves the point that they only do purely Toriyama stuff.
The entire mission statement of the game since before it came out was to be able to play the story from the manga & Z. I'm pretty sure they included Bardock specifically because it was a part of the original Z run, plus they needed content for the second round of DLCs & that was 1 they could pull from it. GT isn't particularly a series people remember fondly & it's not part of Z, so they're not bothering.
Only dubs that matter are DB, Kai, & Super. Nothing else.
https://www.youtube.com/user/Scsigs
https://linktr.ee/Scsigs

The Dark Knight
Regular
Posts: 715
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2025 10:48 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread

Post by The Dark Knight » Sat Jul 04, 2026 11:06 am

Scsigs wrote: Sat Jul 04, 2026 11:01 amGT isn't particularly a series people remember fondly & it's not part of Z, so they're not bothering.
I like to believe there's a silent majority out there just dying to play a mini game of dancing with the Para Para Brothers. 8)

Post Reply