Right, this episode definitely proved how great the flow of the story is, with pacing that is completely all over the place.The Dark Knight wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 10:20 am
Why do we need "slice of life" moments with characters who add nothing to the story ? Battle of Gods is the story of Goku, Beerus, and Vegeta; everyone else is just background noise; the less time spent with them the better the flow of the story is.
Just because Goku, Beerus and Vegeta are the main chatacters of this arc, doesn't mean that the rest of the cast should be cardboard cutouts. No one said that an entire episode should be dedicated to them partying or something, and everyone and their mother knows the Pilaf Gang got too much attention in both of the previous iterations, but at least treat these characters as actual characters. Have them react at least to what is going on. The Z fighters vs Beerus fight was off for that very reason, they just randomly attack him, and get taken out in the blink of an eye, no one is giving any human reaction to what is even going on. Also claiming those 3 characters were the only ones relevant to the story is false. If you're not gonna treat these characters well, at least treat Bulma well. She's one of the franchise's main characters, and YES, she IS important to this arc, especially to Vegeta's character. The "my Bulma" moment didn't flow as well here as in the other iterations because up to that point Vegeta and Bulma didn't have A SINGLE interaction. Videl and Gohan should be treated better as they are also relevant to this arc, without them the God Ritual next episode wouldn't work. Yet so far Videl didn't even have a single line of dialogue, and even Gohan has only spoken once, lol. At the very least they should have kept the moment where they show Piccolo their wedding image, but no, Oolong's RPS scene was appearantly far more important to dedicate so much time on.
Do you genuinely believe they think their viewers are that stupid? This theory doesn't work anyways, not only do future arcs directly mention that yes, they are in fact the Pilaf gang, but they literally refer to Pilaf as "Pilaf-sama" in this episode. Unless you think they want their viewers to believe Pilaf named his identical looking son after himself lol.The Dark Knight wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2026 10:20 am
They probably aren't explaining why they're kids because of how creepy the concept of Trunks being involved with Mai is. If anything, I think they want the viewers to just assume these are the kids of the original Pilaf gang.






