What is your canon policy? Do you have one?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
johnboy1
Regular
Posts: 727
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 7:15 pm

What is your canon policy? Do you have one?

Post by johnboy1 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:43 pm

The title really says it all. What do you think represents "true" Dragon Ball? What is your opinion on filler, GT, the movies, the TV specials, the original illustrated stories, the guidebooks, and all the other extraneous crap we seem to love so much? Do you have a canon policy at all? If not, then how do you debate, or do you?

Me? My canon consists of the manga in its Kanzenban form and the Burdock TV special. The latter is included due to its events being explicitly referenced in the manga after its production (meaning the TV special existed, then was referenced in the manga, not the other way around). This is, in my opinion, true, unadulterated Dragon Ball, and is the ultimate word in any debate.
To a strong man, the end justifies the means. To a stronger man, the means justify the end.

User avatar
A-dono
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:42 pm
Location: Earth

Post by A-dono » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:08 pm

I consider the original manga and anything Toriyama clearly and explicitly states to be the primary canon. Anime filler is the source of a great deal of Dragonball's most egregious plot holes so I tend to dismiss it as extraneous, even the stuff that Toriyama may or may not have had a hand in.

I don't think all filler is bad, but 85% of it is an eyesore to me.

User avatar
Rod
Regular
Posts: 714
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:56 pm
Location: Mexico
Contact:

Post by Rod » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:18 pm

A-dono wrote:I consider the original manga and anything Toriyama clearly and explicitly states to be the primary canon. Anime filler is the source of a great deal of Dragonball's most egregious plot holes so I tend to dismiss it as extraneous, even the stuff that Toriyama may or may not have had a hand in.

I don't think all filler is bad, but 85% of it is an eyesore to me.
That's pretty much what I consider canon (even though Toriyama probably doesn't give a rat's ass) I also consider the Bardock special and the Jump Special to be canon

User avatar
Rory
I Live Here
Posts: 2777
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 5:15 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Rory » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:20 pm

To me, if it's in the manga, it definatley canon.
If it's in the anime, and it doesn't contradict the manga, then it's good in my book!
If it even slightly contradicts the manga, then it's absolutely not canon.
So basicly, it's manga + whatever else fits.

Olivier Hague
I Live Here
Posts: 2171
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:09 pm

Post by Olivier Hague » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:24 pm

The manga + non-contradictory information released / endorsed by the same entities that wrote / published the manga (which means I would exclude anime-related stuff, but include that new tidbit about the Kaiô's origins, for example).

User avatar
DemonRin
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1390
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:50 am
Location: Somewhere
Contact:

Post by DemonRin » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:27 pm

Manga + Toriyama-endorsed Databooks = Undisputed Canon

Anime filler that does NOT contradict the Manga = Fair to be considered canon

Everything else, including all of GT = Not Canon in the slightest.

User avatar
Amigo Ten
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1712
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:00 am
Location: England
Contact:

Post by Amigo Ten » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:33 pm

Pretty much just the manga and whatever random tidbits Toriyama comes out with (and even some of those I don't really bother with).

User avatar
yunzabit
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Post by yunzabit » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:35 pm

My canon? That's all of the Dragonball manga until the end of the Freeza arc and the Bardock special.

User avatar
Rocketman
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10799
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:17 pm

Post by Rocketman » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:36 pm

The manga alone. The Daizenshuu and anything Toriyama has said are on the same level as the anime, i.e. not canon at all.

User avatar
Remix
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:32 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida

Post by Remix » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:54 pm

Well, my thing is pretty simple.

If it ain't in the manga or Trunks/Bardock specials, it ain't canon. That and the Daizenshuu. Everything else is filler.
Hi, I'm WeeklyTubeShow. Innagadadavida and I like to make videos.

Perhaps you'd like to see one.

User avatar
Amigo Ten
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1712
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:00 am
Location: England
Contact:

Post by Amigo Ten » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:57 pm

Remix wrote:Well, my thing is pretty simple.

If it ain't in the manga or Trunks/Bardock specials, it ain't canon. That and the Daizenshuu. Everything else is filler.
But... The manga and the Trunks special conflict...

User avatar
Kaboom
Moderator
Posts: 14505
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:07 pm

Post by Kaboom » Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:01 pm

The manga itself is my "primary canon."

Everything else, like the anime, movies, guidebooks, and so on, fall into one big general "secondary canon."

The Bardock special is somewhere in-between. :D
[ BlueSky | Bsky: DBS Plots | DeviantArt | Twitter (Depreciated) ]

[PSN/Steam: KaboomKrusader | Switch FC: SW-4304-7361-2824 | ACNH Dream Address: DA-1637-4046-7415 ("SlamZone") ]

Powar Levuls! — DBZ | Movies & Specials | GT

User avatar
Raki
I Live Here
Posts: 2719
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:50 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by Raki » Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:17 pm

The manga
TV Specials
Jump Special
The series doesn't start with the arrival of Raditz. Stop being lazy and watch Dragonball.

User avatar
Rod
Regular
Posts: 714
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:56 pm
Location: Mexico
Contact:

Post by Rod » Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:40 pm

Rocketman wrote:The manga alone. The Daizenshuu and anything Toriyama has said are on the same level as the anime, i.e. not canon at all.
What about the Barcock special?

Oolong215
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:41 pm
Location: Washington, U.S.A.

Post by Oolong215 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:44 pm

The manga, Burdock special and info from the super Exciting Guides are the only things I consider canon.
How can thou be out of breath when thou hast breat to say thou art out of breath?

User avatar
Remix
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:32 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida

Post by Remix » Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:49 pm

Amigo Ten wrote:
Remix wrote:Well, my thing is pretty simple.

If it ain't in the manga or Trunks/Bardock specials, it ain't canon. That and the Daizenshuu. Everything else is filler.
But... The manga and the Trunks special conflict...
Do they? Huh. You're gonna have to remind me how they're at odds. I honestly can't remember.
Hi, I'm WeeklyTubeShow. Innagadadavida and I like to make videos.

Perhaps you'd like to see one.

User avatar
Kaboom
Moderator
Posts: 14505
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:07 pm

Post by Kaboom » Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:51 pm

Remix wrote:Do they? Huh. You're gonna have to remind me how they're at odds. I honestly can't remember.
There's only one major difference. In the anime special, Trunks first goes Super Saiyan after Gohan is killed. In the "Trunks Story" special chapter of the manga, Trunks is already a Super Saiyan at the beginning of the story.
[ BlueSky | Bsky: DBS Plots | DeviantArt | Twitter (Depreciated) ]

[PSN/Steam: KaboomKrusader | Switch FC: SW-4304-7361-2824 | ACNH Dream Address: DA-1637-4046-7415 ("SlamZone") ]

Powar Levuls! — DBZ | Movies & Specials | GT

User avatar
Amigo Ten
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1712
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:00 am
Location: England
Contact:

Post by Amigo Ten » Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:52 pm

Remix wrote:
Amigo Ten wrote:
Remix wrote:Well, my thing is pretty simple.

If it ain't in the manga or Trunks/Bardock specials, it ain't canon. That and the Daizenshuu. Everything else is filler.
But... The manga and the Trunks special conflict...
Do they? Huh. You're gonna have to remind me how they're at odds. I honestly can't remember.
Trunks is shown as a Super Saiyan before Gohan dies in the manga, whereas in the special he achieves it for the first time up discovering Gohan's body.

User avatar
DemonRin
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1390
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:50 am
Location: Somewhere
Contact:

Post by DemonRin » Sat Aug 15, 2009 12:43 am

Rocketman wrote:The manga alone. The Daizenshuu and anything Toriyama has said are on the same level as the anime, i.e. not canon at all.
Why are the Daizenshuu and guidebooks from Toriyama not canon?

User avatar
Thanos
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1664
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:33 am
Location: South Korea

Post by Thanos » Sat Aug 15, 2009 12:44 am

The only thing I don't consider canon are the some of the movies, only because they're impossible to ignore and impossible to just give a pass as fitting with the story.

Like with the Janenba movie... Vegeta is dead? What!? You're telling me Boo was taking a break while that shit went down? :roll:

Although, I'm unhappy with some portions of the filler. For instance, without the filler, there's a chance Ginew would still be alive. :oops: Maybe King Cold too, because I had this fantasy about him escaping and getting healed, like Freeza and Coola did. Those two were much worse off than King Cold, yet he dies... bullshit! :P

Post Reply