Piccolo's line concerning Kaioshin

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.
User avatar
Bussani
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8041
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:35 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Piccolo's line concerning Kaioshin

Post by Bussani » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:56 am

It is a bit odd, if you think about it. Obviously Gohan was far beyond Piccolo after his training in the Room of Spirit and Time, and Piccolo didn't even catch up after another year of training. This line says that Kaioshin is far stronger than Piccolo. We've also been told that no Kaioshin could pull the Zeta Sword out, but Gohan did it at SSJ. Shouldn't this mean that Kaioshin was weaker than Gohan? Not only that, but he was the weakest of the Kaioshin, so wouldn't he have to be quite a bit weaker than Gohan to leave room for the other Kaioshin who could move the sword (assuming they all tried)? Not to mention this is the Gohan that had been slacking for 7 years. Had the gap between Piccolo and Gohan really become this huge?

I have no real opinion here. Just thinking out loud.
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!

Piccolo Daimaoh
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5407
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Piccolo's line concerning Kaioshin

Post by Piccolo Daimaoh » Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:17 am

Savage68 wrote:Daizenshuu Translation
Yep that seems right, Kaiohshin really was stronger than Piccolo after all.

User avatar
Piccolo Daimao
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8749
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am

Re: Piccolo's line concerning Kaioshin

Post by Piccolo Daimao » Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:59 am

Herms wrote:The "original and Japanese versions"? How does that work?

He says "Chigai-sugirujigen ga…"/"Our dimensions...are too different". It's the same thing Tenshinhan says when he sees Super Saiyan Goku.
I meant "the original Japanese & Viz versions". Thanks for contributing the line, though! :P

And yeah, I do think it depends on how you interpret the line. Personally, I think that it's relating to strength, and that seems to the most common opinion. But if people want to take it as Piccolo thinking that because of Kaiôshin's higher god rank, then that's their personal judgement.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.

User avatar
Godo
I Live Here
Posts: 3367
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:25 am

Re: Piccolo's line concerning Kaioshin

Post by Godo » Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:00 am

Piccolo Daimaoh wrote:
Savage68 wrote:Daizenshuu Translation
Yep that seems right, Kaiohshin really was stronger than Piccolo after all.
Or we can just assume that the individual, a human like the rest of us, made his own interpretation of the line.
With Toriyama's memory, I doubt that he proof checked everything. That would be wishful thinking.

User avatar
Savage68
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1929
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:16 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Re: Piccolo's line concerning Kaioshin

Post by Savage68 » Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:28 am

I didn't assume he did proof anything in the first place. I don't care.

The problem with making baseless personal interpretations is that we already have a definitive answer. If it can be refuted, whatever goes. But it can't, so...random fan's personal interpretation means little next to nothing.

User avatar
Godo
I Live Here
Posts: 3367
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:25 am

Re: Piccolo's line concerning Kaioshin

Post by Godo » Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:13 pm

Savage68 wrote:I didn't assume he did proof anything in the first place. I don't care.

The problem with making baseless personal interpretations is that we already have a definitive answer. If it can be refuted, whatever goes. But it can't, so...random fan's personal interpretation means little next to nothing.
On the contrary, a fan's interpretation weighs higher!
You seem to be one of those that have forgotten to who the story was written, and why.
It was written for the fans! For our imagination!

It was never meant to be dissected as thorougly as we do it, but even if we do it, we have to take into consideration the manga and our interpretation first, because of what you are doing, is taking a certain individual's view, and making it your own. Without a second thought. Since "you don't care". And you think that your "facts" should weigh higher than other fans' observations and opinions derived from the actual source? Pfft, allow me to chuckle.

Sure, some information in those books are interesting, but since I still enjoy reading the manga, I won't let anything to come and destroy my first view of it. Which is the kind of way the mangaka want them to be experienced.
The Dragonball universe makes perfect sense for me without them, and my own "opinions" too.
So whatever some random Japanese guy wrote, it doesn't matter, since Dragonball is the manga I read, and I have imagination and information enough to not rely on guidebooks like a mindless drone.

User avatar
Savage68
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1929
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:16 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Re: Piccolo's line concerning Kaioshin

Post by Savage68 » Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:18 pm

*plugs ears and says 'la-la-la-la'*

See, I bet you couldn't even tell the difference between myself and you. :D

But yeah, your personal interpretation is cool as long as you don't try to purport it weighing over 'some random Japanese guy'.

Piccolo Daimaoh
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5407
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Piccolo's line concerning Kaioshin

Post by Piccolo Daimaoh » Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:57 am

Godo wrote:
Savage68 wrote:I didn't assume he did proof anything in the first place. I don't care.

The problem with making baseless personal interpretations is that we already have a definitive answer. If it can be refuted, whatever goes. But it can't, so...random fan's personal interpretation means little next to nothing.
On the contrary, a fan's interpretation weighs higher!
You seem to be one of those that have forgotten to who the story was written, and why.
It was written for the fans! For our imagination!

It was never meant to be dissected as thorougly as we do it, but even if we do it, we have to take into consideration the manga and our interpretation first, because of what you are doing, is taking a certain individual's view, and making it your own. Without a second thought. Since "you don't care". And you think that your "facts" should weigh higher than other fans' observations and opinions derived from the actual source? Pfft, allow me to chuckle.

Sure, some information in those books are interesting, but since I still enjoy reading the manga, I won't let anything to come and destroy my first view of it. Which is the kind of way the mangaka want them to be experienced.
The Dragonball universe makes perfect sense for me without them, and my own "opinions" too.
So whatever some random Japanese guy wrote, it doesn't matter, since Dragonball is the manga I read, and I have imagination and information enough to not rely on guidebooks like a mindless drone.
You sir, are a truly wise man for saying that.

User avatar
temujin
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 93
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:09 pm
Location: Catskill

Re: Piccolo's line concerning Kaioshin

Post by temujin » Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:10 am

Savage68 wrote:I didn't assume he did proof anything in the first place. I don't care.

The problem with making baseless personal interpretations is that we already have a definitive answer. If it can be refuted, whatever goes. But it can't, so...random fan's personal interpretation means little next to nothing.
Perfect!

Post Reply