Cyborgs arc questions

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.
User avatar
VegettoEX
Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
Posts: 17788
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Cyborgs arc questions

Post by VegettoEX » Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:19 pm

No reason for the snark, folks. If you can't politely converse, please don't bother posting.
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7966
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Cyborgs arc questions

Post by dbgtFO » Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:50 pm

VegettoEX wrote:No reason for the snark, folks. If you can't politely converse, please don't bother posting.
I apologize, if I was being snarky(also dirceted at Senzu_Bean!). I don't think I was though :?
Senzu_Bean wrote:
dbgtFO wrote:Not really, in that same thread you disagreed with the Daizenshuu, so yeah you are pretty much inconsistent with yourself.
Seriously?! I was making fun of those who say the Daizenshuu is wrong for no good reason. Did really anyone thought I was serious? Specially with the "suckz"?
It was a pretty weird comment to make, but as we saw even the mod Kaboom thought it was serious, so why shouldn't I? It didn't look like you were being humorous though, so I had to take it as a serious comment.
Senzu_Bean wrote:
dbgtFO wrote:It is another attempt at showing, that the Daizenshuus aren't correct by default, when they state things in there, that should correlate with the manga canon, yet they don't do that all the time.
Then I guess Vegeta is only close to 20,000 instead of 30,000 against Recoome?
Vegeta decided, that he was so weak, that he wouldn't bother going full power, and instead of measuring the BP of Vegeta, the scouters actually measured the BP of Vegeta's scream, because it was that powerfull 8)
Well I didn't say they were wrong all the time, corrections like that, when there is an obvious inconsistency(some people think it isn't though) is welcomed(It was even put in the Kanzenban release!). But when they put a character in a league, he most certainly wasn't in, proven/implied by manga material, then they are not really consistent with what actually happened in the manga, and that's why I'm always a little sceptic about the Daizenshuu's statements.

User avatar
Terra-jin
Regular
Posts: 660
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 8:45 am
Location: the Netherlands

Re: Cyborgs arc questions

Post by Terra-jin » Thu Oct 21, 2010 12:23 pm

Kaboom wrote:Support for the Androids being the same power between timelines:
1 - Trunks, being unconscious during Gohan's last stand, never learns like Gohan did that the Androids were holding back so much power.
2 - The Androids label Trunks as a "toy" for them, strongly implying they've holding back their full power against him like they did with Gohan.
3 - Gero stopped observing the heroes after the battle with Vegeta, so nothing Trunks did to change the timeline would directly effect his work on any of the Androids.
4 - Cell is from a future practically identical to Trunks' and yet has accurate data regarding the Androids and their power, which holds true for the past Androids as well.
5 - Again, there is NO given, factual, infallible indicator within the story that there is any difference between the two alternate pairs of Androids.
1 - True
2 - You're sceptical about Trunks' sayings, yet you immediately accept a villain's declaration of his own power as solid fact :P
3 - The cyborgs are definitely different in character, so Gero must've done something.
4 - Did Cell have accurate readings on the future androids, as well? Where is this implied?
5 - Beside their personality you mean, I presume :)
It's all GOOD

User avatar
Super Saiyan Turlast x4
I Live Here
Posts: 3411
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

Re: Cyborgs arc questions

Post by Super Saiyan Turlast x4 » Thu Oct 21, 2010 12:47 pm

In regards to the Future Cell, he states the Spy Robots calculated how strong Trunks was--and that his power showed he was no match for the Androids. SInce he knows Trunks (Before leaving for the past) is weaker than the Androids, he had to have known how much power they had.
"First I whip it out! Then I thrust it! With great force! Every angle...! It penetrates! Until...! With great strength...! I... ram it in! In the end... We are all satisfied... And you are set free...!" ~Dante~

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7966
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Cyborgs arc questions

Post by dbgtFO » Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:15 pm

Terra-jin wrote:
Kaboom wrote:Support for the Androids being the same power between timelines:
1 - Trunks, being unconscious during Gohan's last stand, never learns like Gohan did that the Androids were holding back so much power.
2 - The Androids label Trunks as a "toy" for them, strongly implying they've holding back their full power against him like they did with Gohan.
3 - Gero stopped observing the heroes after the battle with Vegeta, so nothing Trunks did to change the timeline would directly effect his work on any of the Androids.
4 - Cell is from a future practically identical to Trunks' and yet has accurate data regarding the Androids and their power, which holds true for the past Androids as well.
5 - Again, there is NO given, factual, infallible indicator within the story that there is any difference between the two alternate pairs of Androids.
1 - True
2 - You're sceptical about Trunks' sayings, yet you immediately accept a villain's declaration of his own power as solid fact :P
3 - The cyborgs are definitely different in character, so Gero must've done something.
4 - Did Cell have accurate readings on the future androids, as well? Where is this implied?
5 - Beside their personality you mean, I presume :)
3 - If you believe in that theory, that the androids of Trunks future was Bloodlusted when activated instead of being like the present ones, who at first only wanted to kill Goku, then yes Gero did something different. But I don't buy that, because the story happened a little differently, so instead of being outclassed so fast and finding love(18's supposed love towards Krillin). These androids started falling into their evil side, which every human has anyway, so the same could have happened in the present timeline.

User avatar
Dayspring
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Re: Cyborgs arc questions

Post by Dayspring » Fri Oct 22, 2010 10:33 pm

Kaboom wrote: 4 - Cell is from a future practically identical to Trunks' and yet has accurate data regarding the Androids and their power, which holds true for the past Androids as well.
I have to play devil's advocate on this one: Cell could have outdated information here. Meaning his intel is for when they were activated in 767 and nothing beyond that. It's possible they'd get weaker over time for some unknown-to-us reason, so Cell just prepares for the worse case scenario.

But to play devil's... um... prosecutor(?), this doesn't mean it prooves the androids are different, either.
Captain Christopher Pike wrote:The away team will consist of myself, Cadet Kirk, Mr. Sulu, and Ensign Olsen.
Freeza Heika wrote: for the land of the cool, and the home of the Appule
The Geeky Gentleman: For all your comics, movies, TV and other geeky needs.

User avatar
Piccolo Daimao
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8749
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am

Re: Cyborgs arc questions

Post by Piccolo Daimao » Sat Oct 23, 2010 2:48 pm

Just something I want to throw out here...if the Artificial Humans were indeed as strong as their future counterparts, what significance, if any, would that have on the story? Why even bother mentioning it? It seems like Trunks saying that these Artificial Humans are even stronger than his ones is supposed to have an impact on the readers', thinking, "These Artificial Humans are even stronger than the ones that Trunks couldn't defeat?! We really are screwed!!" It would demean the impact of these words if it turned out that they were actually at the same strength. By the way, this is only an out-universe answer, trying to explain how this statement would add to the drama and have an impact on the readers.

And yes, you do say that Gero stopped observing the heroes after the battle with Vegeta, so nothing Trunks (or even Cell) did to change the timeline would directly affect his work on the Artificial Humans. But this is time travel here. It's called a butterfly effect. Even the slightest action in the past can have an impact on other things, no matter how insignificant. This is evident in science fiction concerning time travel, where one action causes a ripple effect.

Cell does have data regarding the Artificial Humans and their power, and he knew how much power he needed to absorb to surpass them, but Cell does say he got carried away and absorbed "more power than he needed to". So, he could've absorbed all those humans, known that he'd surpassed them using his data on the future Artificial Humans, and still gotten more powerful than the Present Artificial Humans, since he absorbed more than he needed to. Anyway, I don't think that, once Cell reached a power that was over #17 and #18's, he would've stopped and tried to absorb them, because there still wouldn't be a big enough gap in their power. He probably absorbed an amount of power that he was sure would be considerably stronger than the future Artificial Humans before going after them, and then ended up being stronger than the present ones anyway.

I'm not ruling out your opinion that Trunks was wrong and the future Artificial Humans are as strong as the present ones. There's strong evidence behind the fact that Trunks was wrong, since, although he appears to be intelligent and cautious as a character, he's still quite naive and has been wrong about other stuff. I don't agree nor disagree with you on this matter.
Terra-jin wrote:
Kaboom wrote:3 - Gero stopped observing the heroes after the battle with Vegeta, so nothing Trunks did to change the timeline would directly effect his work on any of the Androids.
3 - The cyborgs are definitely different in character, so Gero must've done something.
I'm going to play devil's advocate here too. Who's to say #17 and #18 wouldn't have gone rampant in the present timeline if Goku was dead? In the present timeline, they actually had an objective: find Goku and kill him. In the future timeline, Goku was already dead, so they had no purpose other than just play around, which is what they did in the present timeline, only in a different manner. Their form of playing was causing mindless death and destruction, because it was just a game to them, just like it was a game to find and kill Goku in the present timeline.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.

User avatar
Dayspring
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Re: Cyborgs arc questions

Post by Dayspring » Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:32 pm

Piccolo Daimao wrote:Just something I want to throw out here...if the Artificial Humans were indeed as strong as their future counterparts, what significance, if any, would that have on the story? Why even bother mentioning it? It seems like Trunks saying that these Artificial Humans are even stronger than his ones is supposed to have an impact on the readers', thinking, "These Artificial Humans are even stronger than the ones that Trunks couldn't defeat?! We really are screwed!!" It would demean the impact of these words if it turned out that they were actually at the same strength. By the way, this is only an out-universe answer, trying to explain how this statement would add to the drama and have an impact on the readers.
I disagree, because they still were screwed. The androids are a greater threat than their future counterparts because they don't hold back. Finding out the reason they were a bigger threat is because they held back just makes things seem more hopeless in Trunks The Story, not take away from Dragonball.
Captain Christopher Pike wrote:The away team will consist of myself, Cadet Kirk, Mr. Sulu, and Ensign Olsen.
Freeza Heika wrote: for the land of the cool, and the home of the Appule
The Geeky Gentleman: For all your comics, movies, TV and other geeky needs.

User avatar
jackjack
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 440
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:03 am

Re: Cyborgs arc questions

Post by jackjack » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:52 am

Dayspring wrote:
Kaboom wrote: 4 - Cell is from a future practically identical to Trunks' and yet has accurate data regarding the Androids and their power, which holds true for the past Androids as well.
I have to play devil's advocate on this one: Cell could have outdated information here. Meaning his intel is for when they were activated in 767 and nothing beyond that. It's possible they'd get weaker over time for some unknown-to-us reason, so Cell just prepares for the worse case scenario.
Doesn't really matter, considering Cell would want to surpass Piccolo as well.
Kaboom wrote: If Cell tried to face off against a pair of Androids which were stronger than the ones he had data on... he'd be in major trouble.
No, he wouldn't; see above.

Post Reply