The Awkward Age

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.
User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

The Awkward Age

Post by Herms » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:14 pm

So back in the day I made this timeline evaluation thread to explain where exactly all those super specific dates in Daizenshuu 7's timeline are based on. But while I examined all the stuff about the gaps between events and where the specific months come from and whatnot, I didn't really touch on the central issue of where the specific year numbers ultimately derive from. I can't remember if this was an oversight or I wimped out, since the subject is a huge mess. But it's probably high time I examine all this, just to set the record straight. What record? Beats me.

Oh, and also back in my age guide, I wrote the following about Trunks' age:
About Trunks' timeline. We know he's born in Age 766, and when he first arrives in the past he says he's 17, meaning he must have comes from Age 783. But later, when Trunks finds Cell's time machine, he sees that the time machine came from Age 788 and says that this is three years in the future from when he came, meaning he came from Age 785. So apparently 2 years passed for Trunks between his first and second visit to the past. I guess.
However, when I wrote that I didn't have all the facts at hand, and there's quite a bit more to add to that. So yeah, apparently now I have to make entire new guides just to explain what I messed up or left out of my previous guides. This is not an encouraging trend.

How to Make a Calendar
Well anyway, to start off, where exactly do all those specific years you see in the guidebooks or DB Online come from? There is in fact only one specific year ever mentioned throughout the entire manga: Age 788, the year Cell came from in his stolen time machine. This comes from chapter 358, where Trunks investigates Cell’s time machine. It’s ultimately from this single year that all the other ones derive from, though as you can imagine this is far from a straightforward process.

Now, if Cell came from the year Age 788, then what year does he arrive in, and when do the other events of the series take place? In chapter 358, Trunks says that Age 788 is 3 years even further in the future than the year he came from, meaning Trunks must have come from Age 785. In chapter 334, back when Trunks first traveled from the future, he tells Goku that he came from roughly 20 years in the future. But how much time passed for Trunks between his first and second trips into the past? In chapter 335, Trunks tells Goku that he’ll come back again in 3 years (from Goku’s perspective) if he manages to survive long enough in his own time for the time machine to charge up enough energy for another round trip, so obviously some significant amount of time must have passed between Trunks’ two time trips. In the side-story chapter “Trunks: the Story”, Bulma says that it takes 8 months for the time machine to fully charge for a round trip. So Age 785 would be at least 20 years and 8 months after Goku’s return to Earth. Accordingly, Daizenshuu 7 sets Age 764 as the year Goku returns to Earth. The 8 months gets rounded up to a year, probably because a passage of 8 months usually will take you into the next year. Going by this, the battle with the androids and Cell is in Age 767, 3 years later.

However, there is a bit of a hiccup in all this. In chapter 363, when Cell gives Piccolo his impromptu autobiography, he says that the research to complete him has already begun, though he won’t be completed until 24 years in the future. If Cell won’t be completed for 24 years, then obviously the year he sets out in the time machine must be at least that far in the future. But if the year is 767, then Cell wouldn’t be completed until 791…but Trunks says Cell came from 788. We could try to resolve this contradiction by saying that the year of the Cell Games is 764 (essentially pushing back all the daizenshuu year numbers by 3), but if Cell really did come from 24 years in the future, then this would mean that 4 years passed for Trunks between his first and second trips to the past. After all, when he first appears, Trunks says that he’s from 20 years in the future, so 3 years later when the artificial humans appear, that future would now be only 17 years from the present. But if Cell came from 24 years in the future, and Trunks came from 3 years earlier, then Trunks came from 21 years in the future…4 years later than the initial future he came from. So more time would have actually passed for him than Goku and the others.

That’s kind of odd, but is it actually contradictory? Well, Trunks tells Bulma the first time he appears that he’s 17, so if 4 years did pass for him, when he next appears he’d be 21, even though he looks the same. And yet after spending just 1 year training inside the Room of Spirit and Time, Trunks is notably taller (Bulma even comments on this when he returns to his own future). Also, as mentioned earlier, Bulma says in “Trunks: the Story” that it takes only 8 months for the time machine to charge for a round trip. So why would Trunks wait 4 years? Confusing things even more, in chapter 419 after Trunks defeats the androids in his own timeline and prepares for a third trip to the past, the narrator says that after “over 3 years” the time machine has “finally” accumulated enough energy for a round trip. This would fit in well with 4 years passing between Trunks’ first and second trips to the past, but contradicts what “Trunks: the Story” says about the time machine needing only 8 months to charge for a round trip.

All in all, I think it makes the most sense to disregard Cell and the chapter 419 narrator’s statements and say that there’s only an 8 month gap between Trunks’ first two trips. Otherwise, you have to believe that Trunks went from 17 to 21 between his two trips without changing in appearance at all, then went from 21 to 22 and changed noticeably. And you have to ignore all the official birth years and other dates given throughout Daizenshuu 7, the GT Perfect Files, the SEG, and now DB Online. And of course you have to ignore what Bulma says in “Trunks: the Story” (though either way you have to ignore something said in the manga).

To review, in the manga we’re told that Cell came from Age 788, and Trunks says he came from 3 years earlier, placing his second trip in 785. Based on the “8 months to charge” rule said in “Trunks: the Story”, Daizenshuu 7 places Trunks’ first trip in Age 784, and since at that time Trunks said he was from about 20 years in the future, the year Trunks kills Freeza and Goku returns to Earth becomes 764. That places the battles with the androids and Cell in 767, the Boo arc in 774, and the end of the manga in 784. Backtracking, Goku fought Vegeta and Freeza in 762 and Raditz in 761, the 23rd Tenkaichi Budoukai was in 756, the 22nd in 753, the 21st in 750, and the start of the manga in 749. More details on the exact gaps between events is in my old timeline evaluation thread.

There’s a slight inconsistency in Daizenshuu 4, which says that the heart medicine Trunks gave Goku was brought from Age 785, while according to Daizenshuu 7’s setup Trunks brought it from 784. The 785 date contradictions Daizenshuu 7 but not necessarily the manga: after all, if just 8 months are needed to charge the time machine, then potentially Trunks could have left for his first trip in January-April 785 and for his second in September-December 785. Probably this mention of 785 is just an artifact of them having not worked out the detailed timeline yet.

Trunks' Age
Now to go more in-depth about Trunks’ age, if you can stand it. When he first appears, he identifies himself as being 17 years old. He tells Goku that he’ll be born 2 and a half years in the future, so since he comes from “about 20 years” in the future, that should technically put him at 17 and a half. His exact birth year as given in Daizenshuu 7 and the SEGs is 766. There seems to be a slight problem with this, though. Daizenshuu 7 places Trunks’ first trip to the past where he kills Freeza and meets Goku as being in August of 764, which derives from how it places the Goku/Freeza fight in December 762, which comes from…well, it’s a long story. See the timeline evaluation thread. The point is, if Trunks shows up in August 764, shouldn’t two and a half years later be sometime in 767? But that’s only if you assume that it refers literally to 30 months. Though any way you slice it, it seems like Trunks would have to be born pretty late in 766 for this to work. Which actually fits pretty well: Trunks says that he’ll be born in 2.5 years, and the androids will show up in 3 years, on May 12th. If there’s about half a year separating Trunks’ birth from the androids’ arrival, and the androids show on in early May, then that would in fact place Trunks’ birth late in the previous year, or very early in the current one at the latest.

Fast forward to the Boo arc, when the main timeline’s Trunks is said to be 8 years old. The Boo arc is established as taking place 7 years after the Cell Games, so if Trunks was born about half a year before that, technically he should be only 7 and a half by then. Furthermore, Goten is said to be 7 in the Boo arc, but if he wasn’t even born at all during the Cell Games, then logically the oldest he could be is somewhere over 6 years (though the timing of Goten’s birth is a whole ‘nother ball of wax). I think this seeming confusion is at least partially due to a cultural difference. In Japan, traditionally age is counted as increasing with the New Year, rather than at individual birthdays. So when the year changes over, everyone’s age goes up by 1. Going by this, if Trunks is born in 766 it makes sense to count him as 8 by 774, because by then he’s been around for 8 New Years, even if his actual birthday hasn’t come around 8 times yet.

Switching back to the future timeline’s Trunks, he tells Goku that Gohan was killed 4 years ago. In Viz, they changed this line to “16 years from now”, switching its reference point from Trunks’ future perspective to Goku and co.’s present one (if Trunks came from about 20 years in the future, then 4 years ago for him would be 16 years in the future for everyone else). In “Trunks: the Story” though, after Gohan is killed the narrator says that “about 3 years” pass, at which point Trunks heads for the past. I suppose we could resolve this by saying that “about 3 years” means something like 3.5 years, and that Trunks simply rounded up while the narrator rounded down. It’s also possible that a further year or so passes between Trunks getting beat up by the androids 3 years after Gohan’s death, and his venture into the past, but there’s absolutely nothing in the manga to indicate this. Oh, and Bulma refers to Gohan as having been killed 3 years ago (no “about” for her), and…she tells Trunks to go 17 years into the past to give the medicine to Goku, instead of 20 years like Trunks originally said he had travelled. So, um…let’s just move on, shall we?

Daizenshuu 7’s alternate timeline explanation assigns specific years to the events in future Trunks’ life. He’s born in Age 766, just like his main timeline counterpart, the androids come in 767 like in the main timeline too, Gohan dies in 780, then Trunks leaves for his first trip in 784 (so they went with Trunks’ original statement on when Gohan died instead of what’s said in “Trunks: the Story”). Then he goes for his second trip in 785 (as mentioned before, this seems to go by the 8-month rule in “Trunks: the Story” instead of what’s said in chapter 419). Then he kills his own timeline’s Cell in 788; this is based on the narrator’s comment in chapter 419 about over 3 years passing, as well as on how earlier in the manga Cell was established to have stolen Trunks’ time machine in 788.

I said earlier how in the manga Cell tells Piccolo he won’t be born for 24 years, and how this causes lots of trouble. Daizenshuu 7’s bio for Cell seems to try and fix this by saying that Cell began being worked on in 762 (the year of the battle with Vegeta, which is when Cell mentions his cells from Goku and co. were collected), and then he was born in 786. So the 24 years Cell mentions is used for his total development time, instead of just the remaining development time when he talks to Piccolo. Interesting, though that raises the question of what Cell did in the two years between being completed and stealing the time machine.

Well anyway, I don’t know what lesson or point there is to all of this, other than to highlight how confusing this stuff can be.

Trunks TV Special
After re-watching the Trunks TV special, I wanted to note that it has its own somewhat unique timeline.

First, the narrator says that the androids appear half a year after Goku dies from his heart disease. In the manga, Trunks tells Goku that he will come down with the disease and die "not long from now". So this moves the timing of Goku's death back two and a half years. My guess is that they did this so that they could show baby Trunks present at Goku's death.

After the androids show up and kill Vegeta, Piccolo, and everyone, the narrator then says 13 years pass, and the special's main story begins: Trunks begins to train under Gohan, only for Gohan to be killed by the androids. If the androids show up in Age 767 (per Daizenshuu 7), then that would place this part of the special in Age 780. This fits in with Daizenshuu 7's alternate timeline chart putting Gohan's death in 780, but there is as usual a complication (for the record, while Daizenshuu 7's detailed timeline for the main series incorporates some things from the anime, its alternate timeline chart seems to be based entirely on the manga). After Gohan's death, the narrator says that 3 years pass before the time machine is completed and Trunks heads to the past. As I went over above, originally in the manga Trunks says 4 years pass between Gohan's death and his trip, while in "Trunks: the Story" the narrator says "about 3 years pass", while Bulma just says 3 years (no "about"). Daizenshuu 7 goes with the original timeframe, 4 years, and so places Gohan's death in 780 and Trunks' first time trip in 784. The TV special though goes with the later timeframe, so for it Trunks would leave in 783, leaving a 2 year gap between this trip and his second one (which as explained above is more or less set in stone as 785).

Tying into this is how in the manga a year passed between the battle where Gohan loses his arm and the one in which he is killed, while in the anime this isn't necessarily so. The dialogue between Gohan and the androids before their final battle is changed so that No.17 doesn't say how long it's been since they fought last. I suppose there's nothing saying that a year didn't pass, but you'd think the narrator would mention something like that. Anyway, if you assume that a year does pass in the anime too, then this would move forward Gohan's death from 780 to 781, and make Trunks go on his first time trip in 784 like in the daizenshuu timeline.

Finally, in the TV special Bulma talks with Trunks about going back "about 20 years" into the past. This fixes the mistake in "Trunks: the Story" where Bulma says he'll go 17 years into the past.

Index of sources

To try and make this marginally easier to keep track of, I’ve sorted out all the bits of information I mentioned above out by source.

Manga

Chapter 333 (DBZ 139)
--Trunks says he’s 17 (during first time trip)

Chapter 334 (DBZ 140)
--Trunks says he came from roughly 20 years in the future (during his first time trip)

Chapter 335 (DBZ 141)
--Trunks says he’ll be born 2 and a half years from now
--Trunks says androids will attack in 3 years, on May 12th
--Trunks says Gohan killed 4 years ago (in his timeline)
--Trunks says Goku will die “not long from now”
--Trunks says he’ll return in 3 years (from Goku’s perspective) if he survives long enough in his own timeline

Chapter 358 (DBZ 164)
--Trunks says Cell came from Age 788, and that he came from 3 years earlier (during second time trip)
--Trunks says Cell arrived in this timeline “about 4 years ago”

Chapter 363 (DBZ 169)
--Cell says he won’t be completed until 24 years in the future
--Cell says it takes him 3 years to mature after returning to egg form

Chapter 419 (DBZ 225)
--Narrator says 3 years pass between Trunks defeating the androids in his timeline and his fight with Cell; says the time machine has “finally” charged up for a round trip

Trunks: the Story
--No.17 says he last fought Gohan about a year ago
--Narrator says “about 3 years” pass between Gohan’s death and Trunks’ first time trip
--Bulma says time machine takes 8 months to charge for a round trip
--Bulma says Gohan killed 3 years before Trunks’ first time trip
--Bulma tells Trunks to go 17 years into past

Anime

Trunks TV Special
--Narrator says half a year passes between Goku’s death and androids’ attack; Trunks present at Goku’s death
--Narrator says 13 years pass between androids’ attack and Trunks beginning to train with Gohan
--Narrator says 3 years pass between Gohan’s death and time machine’s completion
--Bulma says Trunks will go “about 20 years” into the past

Daizenshuu 7

Alternate timeline explanation
Age 764: Freeza attacks Earth
Age 766: Trunks is born
Age 767: Androids attack
Age 780: Gohan dies
Age 784: Trunks’ first time trip
Age 785: Trunks’ second time trip
Age 788: Trunks kills his timelines’ Cell

Cell bio
Age 762: Cell’s development begins
Age 786: Cell’s development finishes

Combined Timeline

Now I’ve tried to throw all that contradictory information together into a single timeline. To make things easier to keep track of, and since the official DB “Age” timeline is based off one possible interpretation of these conflicting sources, I’m going to designate the year Freeza comes to Earth and Trunks shows up as “Year 0” and list everything in relation to that. So when Trunks says he comes from about 20 years in the future, that becomes approximately “Year 20”, and when Cell shows up 1 year before Trunks that becomes “Year -1”. The specific years given in Daizenshuu 7 are converted into this system; so since it has Freeza coming to Earth in Age 764 and Gohan being killed in Age 780, I’ve listed it as placing Gohan’s death in Year 16. I’m also just throwing together events from the parallel timelines into one list. Events that only occur in the “main” series timeline are italicized.

I’ve listed the source for each date in parenthesis. When multiple sources are listed, if they’re separated by commas it means that the same date is given in those different sources (ie, both chapter 334 and Daizenshuu 7 say Trunks initially comes from 20 years in the future). But if the two sources are combined with a + mark, it means I’ve only obtained that date by combining information from those sources. So for instance in chapter 358 Trunks says Cell came from 3 years further in the future than he did, while in chapter 363 Cell says he won’t be completed for another 24 years. By combining those two sources you get that Trunks came from 21 years in the future. On that note, Trunks: the Story has Bulma describing Trunks as going 17 years into the past during his initial trip, contradicting pretty much everything else. The side-story also has other information that fits in better with what we’re told elsewhere, so when using that information together with the idea that Trunks goes about 20 years into the past (as said in chapter 334) I’ve listed it as “Trunks: the Story+c334”. When combining that information with the side-story’s 17 year figure, I’ve uncharitably labeled it “Trunks: the Story+stupid”.

Well anyway, here it is. Hopefully it makes enough sense, given the subject matter:

Year -2
--Gero’s computer begins creating Cell (D7)

Year -1
--Cell arrives in “main” timeline (c358)
--Cell goes underground to grow? (c363)

Year 0
--Freeza comes to Earth
--Trunks appears and warns Goku and co.
--Goku dies “not long from now” (c335)

Year 2
--Trunks is born (D7)
--Cell’s underground growth ends? (c363)

Year 2.5
--Trunks is born (c335)
--Goku dies (TV special)

Year 3
--Androids attack on May 12th (c335, D7)

Year 14
--Gohan is killed (Trunks: the Story+stupid)

Year 16
--Gohan is killed (c335, D7)
--Gohan starts training Trunks (TV special)

Year 17
--Trunks’ first time trip (Trunks: the Story+stupid)
--Gohan is killed (Trunks: the Story+c334)

Year 19
--Time machine is complete (TV special)

Year 20, approximately
--Time machine completed, Trunks’ first time trip (c334, TV special, D7)
--8 months later, Trunks’ second time trip? (Trunks: the Story)

Year 21
--Trunks’ second time trip (D7)

Year 22
--Cell’s development finishes (D7)

Year 24
--Trunks’ second time trip, assuming Cell travels to past the same year his development ends (c358+c363)
--Trunks kills his timelines’ Cell (D7)

Year 27
--Cell’s development is completed (c363)
--Cell goes to past? (c358)
--Assuming Trunks’ 2nd trip is in Year 24, this would be the year Trunks kills Cell in his own timeline (c419)
Last edited by Herms on Sat Feb 18, 2012 5:46 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

User avatar
JulieYBM
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 18542
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: 🏳️‍⚧️🍉

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by JulieYBM » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:28 pm

I...think I shall require reading this over several more times before it all sinks into my brain. :shock:
💙💜💖 She/Her 💙💜💖

User avatar
Floader
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:20 pm
Location: Planet Vegeta

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by Floader » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:33 pm

Is it possible that the initial work on Cell started in Age 764 after the cells of Freeza and King Cold were gathered? Adding 24 years to that would put Cell being completed in Age 788. Assuming that Cell meant that his total development time was 24 years and not 24 years from the point where he is having his talk with Piccolo.

NeoKING
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:55 pm

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by NeoKING » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:58 pm

Soooooooooooooooooooo.........

Either Toriyama needs to retake his Time Travel 101 courses or Toei needs to learn how to be consistent in their guidebook publishings?

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7965
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by dbgtFO » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:59 pm

Herms wrote:Well anyway, I don’t know what lesson or point there is to all of this, other than to highlight how confusing this stuff can be.
I actually planned on making a thread like this, but it seems you beat me to it! :lol:

Anyways. Yeah it really is confusing with all those statements. I actually didn't know that Cell said 24 years from now, when explaining his development, I assumed the same as the Daizenshuu. :?

And the lesson to be learned is probably something about not dealing with timetravel & alternate timelines, if you just make things up as you go along and don't keep proper track of what happened previously in the story, so you won't make huge contradictions.
NeoKING wrote:Soooooooooooooooooooo.........

Either Toriyama needs to retake his Time Travel 101 courses or Toei needs to learn how to be consistent in their guidebook publishings?
What makes you think that Toei was behind the manga specific Daizenshuus?

Deity
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:03 pm

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by Deity » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:08 pm

The lesson in all of this, is that in Japan everyone's age goes up by 1 every new year, instead in the actual birthday. That's always interesting to know !

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by Herms » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:22 pm

Floader wrote:Is it possible that the initial work on Cell started in Age 764 after the cells of Freeza and King Cold were gathered? Adding 24 years to that would put Cell being completed in Age 788. Assuming that Cell meant that his total development time was 24 years and not 24 years from the point where he is having his talk with Piccolo.
Yeah, that would work too, though you'd need to ignore Cell's D7 bio (of course, you have to ignore something to make sense of all this). I was also thinking maybe Cell needed to spend some time underground between his completion and stealing the time machine, though the years don't quite work. He tells Piccolo he needed to spend 3 years underground (but actually spent 4 years, for some reason), so if he was completed in 786 he'd have to steal the time machine in 789, which doesn't work. Though I suppose if you assume "24 years" and "3 years" are both just inexact approximations, you could kinda wiggle that into fitting (ie 762 plus 23.5 years and 2.5 years equals 788). Alternatively, maybe he didn't need to spend as long underground when growing the first time. For that matter, I don't even remember if it was established that he had to spend any amount of time underground at all the first time he grew.
NeoKING wrote:Either Toriyama needs to retake his Time Travel 101 courses or Toei needs to learn how to be consistent in their guidebook publishings?
All the guidebooks are printed by Shueisha, same as the manga, whether they relate to the anime or not. Toei doesn't publish guidebooks because, well, they're not a book publishing company.

Anyway, I think the guidebooks did pretty well considering what they had to work with. The only internal inconsistency with their timelines that I've noticed is D4 saying Trunks brought the medicine from 785, Bra's birth year being different in different places, and D7's alternate timeline explanation not making sense.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

User avatar
Chibi Mystic Gohan
I Live Here
Posts: 2877
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Wakusei Bejeeter

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by Chibi Mystic Gohan » Mon Jan 31, 2011 8:19 pm

Herms wrote:Now to go more in-depth about Trunks’ age, if you can stand it. When he first appears, he identifies himself as being 17 years old. He tells Goku that he’ll be born 2 and a half years in the future, so since he comes from “about 20 years” in the future, that should technically put him at 17 and a half. His exact birth year as given in Daizenshuu 7 and the SEGs is 766. There seems to be a bit of a hiccup with this, though. Daizenshuu 7 places Trunks’ first trip to the past where he kills Freeza and meets Goku as being in August of 784, which derives from how it places the Goku/Freeza fight in December 762, which comes from…well, it’s a long story. See the timeline evaluation thread. The point is, if Trunks shows up in August 784, shouldn’t two and a half years later be sometime in 787? But that’s only if you assume that it refers literally to 30 months. Though any way you slice it, it seems like Trunks would have to be born pretty late in 786 for this to work. Which actually fits pretty well: Trunks says that he’ll be born in 2.5 years, and the androids will show up in 3 years, on May 12th. If there’s about half a year separating Trunks’ birth from the androids’ arrival, and the androids show on in early May, then that would in fact place Trunks’ birth late in the previous year, or very early in the current one at the latest.
Should say: "August of 764," "August 764," "sometime in 767," and "pretty late in 766."
Herms wrote:Interesting, though that raises the question of what Cell did in the two years between being completed and stealing the time machine.
He must have been hunting #17 and #18.
Herms wrote:Well anyway, I don’t know what lesson or point there is to all of this
"Authors are only human."
君と再会ったとき 子供のころ大切に想っていた景色を思い出したんだ
僕と踊ってくれないか 光と影の Winding Road いまでも彼に夢中なの?

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7965
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by dbgtFO » Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:28 pm

Chibi Mystic Gohan wrote:
Herms wrote:Interesting, though that raises the question of what Cell did in the two years between being completed and stealing the time machine.
He must have been hunting #17 and #18.
Pretty much considering that androids don't emit ki and Trunks - the only one, who would actually dare fight them, only fought for about ½ a minute against them(while the other Trunks used the remote control to shut them down, which could mean that he probably suppressed his power to its lowest just in case) and Cell can only find out about their whereabouts, when it's reported on the news.

User avatar
Fox666
I Live Here
Posts: 4343
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by Fox666 » Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:44 pm

It should be hard to find the androids, they are always causing explosions. Or at least it was easy for Gohan and Trunks.

Perhaps Cell was absorbing humans to get strong enough to fight N.17 and N.18? I wonder, supposedly Vegeta and Trunks were impressed by his power, and the androids from Trunks's future aren't much stronger than him.

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by Herms » Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:03 pm

Chibi Mystic Gohan wrote:Should say: "August of 764," "August 764," "sometime in 767," and "pretty late in 766."
Ah, thanks. Fixed.
He must have been hunting #17 and #18.
That makes sense for (the main) Cell's timeline, but for future Trunks' timeline, would he be able to evade Trunks for 2 years while going around in the open looking for them? Trunks must know he's out there somewhere, so shouldn't he have gone hunting after him? I guess it's possible that that happened off-panel during the flash forward, but then you'd think Trunks would mention something about that when he finally meets Cell.

Oh yeah, for that matter, if Cell didn't get completed until 786, then shouldn't Trunks have been able to go destroy him in the lab? Unless he couldn't manage to find the lab in his timeline. Well anyway, I didn't want this to be that kind of timeline thread (not that there's anything wrong with them); I'm sure this has all been gone over a zillion times already.
"Authors are only human."
Works for me.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7965
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by dbgtFO » Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:12 pm

Fox666 wrote:It should be hard to find the androids, they are always causing explosions. Or at least it was easy for Gohan and Trunks.
It was easy for Trunks and Gohan thanks to the news reporters and the Androids blowing up a nearby town after Gohan and Trunks' training session had ended. I doubt Cell would be capable of detecting every explosion in the world and somehow single out the androids.
Fox666 wrote:Perhaps Cell was absorbing humans to get strong enough to fight N.17 and N.18? I wonder, supposedly Vegeta and Trunks were impressed by his power, and the androids from Trunks's future aren't much stronger than him.
According to Cell he's stronger than the Future Androids or at least he throws out a heavy implication that he is.
Inb4 Future < Present Madness

NeoKING
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:55 pm

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by NeoKING » Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:19 pm

dbgtFO wrote:
Herms wrote: What makes you think that Toei was behind the manga specific Daizenshuus?
Made a simple mistake, guy.

User avatar
Chibi Mystic Gohan
I Live Here
Posts: 2877
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Wakusei Bejeeter

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by Chibi Mystic Gohan » Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:48 pm

Fox666 wrote:It should be hard to find the androids, they are always causing explosions. Or at least it was easy for Gohan and Trunks.
Yeah, but the androids were presumably dead at that point. So Cell would be going on a wild goose chase. Even in the Cell arc epilogue, Cell had been constantly searching for the androids until Trunks told him that he'd killed them, three years ago, hence the reason Cell decided to steal the time machine.
Herms wrote:That makes sense for (the main) Cell's timeline, but for future Trunks' timeline, would he be able to evade Trunks for 2 years while going around in the open looking for them? Trunks must know he's out there somewhere, so shouldn't he have gone hunting after him? I guess it's possible that that happened off-panel during the flash forward, but then you'd think Trunks would mention something about that when he finally meets Cell.
Well, since Cell apparently wasn't running around absorbing humans (he only did that in "our" time line because he'd become weaker by reverting to his previous state, right?), Trunks wouldn't really have any way to locate him, assuming Cell was concealing his power. That's why Trunks had to wait for Cell to come to him.
Herms wrote:Oh yeah, for that matter, if Cell didn't get completed until 786, then shouldn't Trunks have been able to go destroy him in the lab? Unless he couldn't manage to find the lab in his timeline. Well anyway, I didn't want this to be that kind of timeline thread (not that there's anything wrong with them); I'm sure this has all been gone over a zillion times already.
Yeah, I've seen that point brought up before. Maybe Trunks didn't think of that? I guess the real reason is because Toriyama thought a battle with Cell would be cooler than just having Trunks blow up the lab...

By the way, have you considered writing a guide about the clusterfuck that is DB time travel?
君と再会ったとき 子供のころ大切に想っていた景色を思い出したんだ
僕と踊ってくれないか 光と影の Winding Road いまでも彼に夢中なの?

User avatar
kaialone
Regular
Posts: 660
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:56 am

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by kaialone » Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:33 pm

I think you broke my brain :( Gah Sorry,ut I´m still going to go by the oficial given birth dates even if there some mistakes here and there.
-凯

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by Herms » Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:03 pm

Chibi Mystic Gohan wrote:By the way, have you considered writing a guide about the clusterfuck that is DB time travel?
Hah, I don't think I own enough soda and/or booze to get me through that.
kaialone wrote:Gah Sorry,ut I´m still going to go by the oficial given birth dates even if there some mistakes here and there.
Well, that's pretty much what I recommended.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by Herms » Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:30 pm

Edit: I've added the information on the Trunks TV special into the original post.
Last edited by Herms on Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

User avatar
DNA
I Live Here
Posts: 4236
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:23 pm

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by DNA » Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:28 am

Hey Herms, would it be too much to ask for an organized timeline about all this? Like, you have the year and then bullet points explaining the events that happened in the year, the twist here would be tags explaining in which media the timed events belong to, be it manga, anime, TV special or Daizenshuu. I think that way would be easier for all of us to understand.

User avatar
Fox666
I Live Here
Posts: 4343
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by Fox666 » Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:00 pm

Herms wrote:There’s a slight inconsistency in Daizenshuu 4, which says that the heart medicine Trunks gave Goku was brought from Age 785, while according to Daizenshuu 7’s setup Trunks brought it from 784. The 785 date contradictions Daizenshuu 7 but not necessarily the manga: after all, if just 8 months are needed to charge the time machine, then potentially Trunks could have left for his first trip in January-April 785 and for his second in September-December 785. Probably this mention of 785 is just an artifact of them having not worked out the detailed timeline yet.
For many reasons, I feel the 7th book is not as reliable as Daizenshuu 2 or 4. I guess that, while the others focus on specific subjects (i.e. races, techniques), Daizenshuu 7 is a massive encyclopedia with data taken from manga, anime and many other sources. It also seems arbitrary how they decide which information will be printed or cut. Or at least it is not reliable to the point of being strict about everything it says.

Anyway, that was a good reading like always, despite the amount of information.
Last edited by Fox666 on Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Perfect
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1865
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:16 am

Re: The Awkward Age

Post by Perfect » Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:34 am

Chibi Mystic Gohan wrote:That's why Trunks had to wait for Cell to come to him.
That would be nerve racking, I mean what if a suppressed Cell snuck up on a sleeping Trucks or unknowing Bulma?

Anyhow, this gave me a little bit of a headache reading through it the first time, I'm sure the majority of it can have sense made out of it with reasonable explanations. I'm pretty busy the rest of the week to start an analytic project like this, but this weekend I know I'll have some free time. I'll definitely take a stab at organizing all the statements and proposing possibilities towards the common fallacies.

This of course would include an examining of the various paradoxes and of course an examination of how relative time's flow is when in retrospective towards the perspective of the characters. So I'd not only be taking a stab at Cell and Trunks' mess, but the actual way the time lines flow is perceived (this portion of the series really fascinates me).
Herms wrote:Oh yeah, for that matter, if Cell didn't get completed until 786, then shouldn't Trunks have been able to go destroy him in the lab? Unless he couldn't manage to find the lab in his timeline. Well anyway, I didn't want this to be that kind of timeline thread (not that there's anything wrong with them); I'm sure this has all been gone over a zillion times already
Well couldn't Cell's mobile larva stage have already begun, thus allowing him to leave the laboratory (and possibly gestate underground)? Daiz #7 states he was "born" in 786 right? Couldn't that just refer to the fact he's coming out of his larval state?
Fox666 wrote:It seems you have pissed a lot of people on this forum, and I am quite sure they would like to call you stupid and say that's the designated adjectives for you. But they don't do that because of there are rules in this community.

Post Reply