Does the Dragonball series treat its women with respect?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
TripleRach
Moderator
Posts: 2656
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 5:08 pm
Location: Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by TripleRach » Sat May 07, 2011 11:31 am

Chibi Gohan wrote:Someone forgot Ranfan. :lol:
Forgot? She was never a main character like the other women listed. But if you want to talk about her, she's probably the worst of all. She seemed like she had some decent fighting skills, and she was probably a good person overall (helping to find sleeping Gokuu). But she was also portrayed as kind of a ditz ("lol i don't have balls?"), was willing to use underhanded tactics (pretending to cry), and resorted to stripping to distract her opponent.

But there is one important female character that people usually seem to forget for these threads: Uranai Baba. She's pretty crotchety, and charges a lot of money to sell her powers. She was also underhanded at times (singing to distract Yamcha). But she also showed concern when Akkuman tried to kill Gokuu, apparently set up the reunion between Gokuu and his grandpa, is willing to give free readings at times (like Gokuu trying to find the Nyoibou), and brought dead Vegeta back to Earth despite being really scared of Boo. She's never sexualized or turned into a background mother, but that's likely because she was meant to be very unattractive.

Overall, I guess I'd say Baba is one of the better treated females in the series, and even ends up as less of a one-dimensional joke than her brother. But I also think it's telling that people brought up a minor character who takes off her clothes before a major character who's old and ugly.
-Rachel

User avatar
Eire
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:58 pm
Location: The Promised Land
Contact:

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by Eire » Sat May 07, 2011 12:01 pm

I don't think you guys should blame it on Toriyama being "bad with female characters." Back in the 80s, it was all about Rocky, Rambo, Die Hard, The Terminator, Super Mario Bros., and all that stuff in Japan.
Earlier Ikeda, and Matsumoto gave better examples of portraying women. Admit it: Toryiama couldn't/didn't want/didn't think about making his female characters anything more than stereotypical reasons to stupid jokes.
But I repeat, what about 18 and Bulma. If 18 was so upset about their situation, then what stopped her from getting a job? And Bulma was spoiled but she still is materialistic when it comes her needs.
We don't know anything about 18's job. Having one never means to spot worry about money. Being materialistic is just a feature that's not good, nor bad, but in DBZ the situation where woman worry about the base of Maslow's pyramid while her husband don't care enough repeat three times. Where in DB matrial arts master tells two boys to work hard it's shown as important part of the plot, but later where their wives complain about money (or studies, or anything else) it was intended to be fun. Unlucky, since I got to know that ATM doesn't withdraw money forever Chi-Chi telling about money run out isn't fun for me any more.
Per aspera ad astra, man!

Women belong in the kitchen.
Men belong in the kitchen.
Everyone belongs in the kitchen, the kitchen has food

User avatar
Rocketman
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10799
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:17 pm

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by Rocketman » Sat May 07, 2011 12:51 pm

Deep Thought wrote:Look at Vegeta on the other hand;
While not excusing the shallowness of the female characters, Vegeta is the most complex character in Dragonball (yes, I know that's not saying much), most everyone's gonna look bad next to him.


At the same time, "caring little about her [Chichi's] own endeavors". What endeavors should she be doing? She's already a literal princess sitting on a big pile of gold (a pile big enough to feed two Saiyans for two decades) and she's in the top ten of strongest beings on Earth, able to match the guy who blew up the Moon.

NeoKING
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:55 pm

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by NeoKING » Sat May 07, 2011 1:00 pm

Eire wrote:
I don't think you guys should blame it on Toriyama being "bad with female characters." Back in the 80s, it was all about Rocky, Rambo, Die Hard, The Terminator, Super Mario Bros., and all that stuff in Japan.
Earlier Ikeda, and Matsumoto gave better examples of portraying women. Admit it: Toryiama couldn't/didn't want/didn't think about making his female characters anything more than stereotypical reasons to stupid jokes.
I didn't say everyone did it. It was a trend, sort of.

I don't see how Toriyama not being able to write good female characters is even all that much of an issue. Dragon Ball's appeal to me the action and adventure, not how well Toriyama can make all his females complex as Shakespeare. For the record, his male characters aren't that deep either sans Vegeta. It's just simple; that's how DB is.

In fact, I actually like the fact that the women in Dragon Ball are stronger and more capable than you'd expect. Bulma's a genius; Chi-Chi can hold her own as one of the strongest women on Earth; 18's 18; Videl eats grown-up armed robbers for breakfast; hell, even Pan kicked ass in the tournament at the end of Z. Setereotype how?

User avatar
MisterFlashdude
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 779
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 3:21 pm

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by MisterFlashdude » Sat May 07, 2011 1:22 pm

You guys can praise Chi-chi for being "strong" until the cows come home, doesn't change the fact that the only fight she's shown in she's immediately defeated by a breeze. After which, she forces a man into marrying her.

CatouttaHell
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1164
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:26 pm
Location: Mount Paozu
Contact:

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by CatouttaHell » Sat May 07, 2011 1:52 pm

Rocketman wrote:she's in the top ten of strongest beings on Earth
Son Goku, Vegeta, Son Gohan, Son Goten, Trunks, Piccolo, Tenshinhan, Chaozu, #17, #18, Kuririn, Yamucha, Muten Roshi, Tsuru-sennin, Tao Pai Pai, Yajirobe, Kami-sama, Dende, Mr. Popo, Karin-sama, etc are all stronger.

So no, she isn't.
Rocketman wrote:Where you born unable to understand jokes or is this the result of years of hard training?

User avatar
Kaboom
Moderator
Posts: 14505
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:07 pm

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by Kaboom » Sat May 07, 2011 2:06 pm

CatouttaHell wrote:
Rocketman wrote:she's in the top ten of strongest beings on Earth
Son Goku, Vegeta, Son Gohan, Son Goten, Trunks, Piccolo, Tenshinhan, Chaozu, #17, #18, Kuririn, Yamucha, Muten Roshi, Tsuru-sennin, Tao Pai Pai, Yajirobe, Kami-sama, Dende, Mr. Popo, Karin-sama, etc are all stronger.So no, she isn't.
Preeeeeetty sure he was making an "at the time" statement. At which point she was on-par with or even stronger than Roshi, who was in, like... 6th or 7th place or something like that. Goku, Piccolo, Kami, Tenshinhan, Kuririn, Yamcha, Chaozu, Chi-Chi, Roshi... Yajirobe in there somewhere... yeah, Chi-Chi's in the top ten.

Anyway, not a power levels thread. Sorry.
[ BlueSky | Bsky: DBS Plots | DeviantArt | Twitter (Depreciated) ]

[PSN/Steam: KaboomKrusader | Switch FC: SW-4304-7361-2824 | ACNH Dream Address: DA-1637-4046-7415 ("SlamZone") ]

Powar Levuls! — DBZ | Movies & Specials | GT

User avatar
Ahiru77
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 811
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 12:05 pm

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by Ahiru77 » Sat May 07, 2011 3:27 pm

Vegeta vs 18 says YES.

Michsi
I Live Here
Posts: 4557
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:10 pm

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by Michsi » Sat May 07, 2011 4:24 pm

Eire wrote: We don't know anything about 18's job. Having one never means to spot worry about money. Being materialistic is just a feature that's not good, nor bad, but in DBZ the situation where woman worry about the base of Maslow's pyramid while her husband don't care enough repeat three times. Where in DB matrial arts master tells two boys to work hard it's shown as important part of the plot, but later where their wives complain about money (or studies, or anything else) it was intended to be fun. Unlucky, since I got to know that ATM doesn't withdraw money forever Chi-Chi telling about money run out isn't fun for me any more.
We don't know if 18 has a job (though I'm pretty sure she doesn't )but at the same time we don't have any proof that Krillin doesn't have one either. He is not Goku and he retired from fighting by the time the Buu Saga started.
In one of the few scenes that focused on the 18 character she was trying out new clothes and complaining how uncool they were. So yeah, single high-tier power female fighter = cares a bout fashion and has almost no interest in fighting

User avatar
Bussani
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8041
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:35 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by Bussani » Sat May 07, 2011 9:01 pm

I wish there had been at least one female character with more of an active role myself, but to be fair, a lot of male characters fall into the same "became useless after this, never heard from again" bin as the handful of female ones. If anyone's going to say Toriyama had it out for women, they may as well say he had it out for humans, too. I mean, yeah, #18 never became anything that important, but what did #17 do? True, Chichi didn't fight much except to get knocked out of the ring by Goku, but how many rounds in the tournaments did Yamcha win?
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4218
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by Kid Buu » Sat May 07, 2011 9:12 pm

Bussani wrote:I wish there had been at least one female character with more of an active role myself, but to be fair, a lot of male characters fall into the same "became useless after this, never heard from again" bin as the handful of female ones. If anyone's going to say Toriyama had it out for women, they may as well say he had it out for humans, too. I mean, yeah, #18 never became anything that important, but what did #17 do? True, Chichi didn't fight much except to get knocked out of the ring by Goku, but how many rounds in the tournaments did Yamcha win?
Topic changed:

Does the Dragonball series treat its humans with respect?

No, Toryiama only loves Saiyans and that one Namek. :lol:
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
SRB2Unleashed
Regular
Posts: 717
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:06 am

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by SRB2Unleashed » Sat May 07, 2011 9:21 pm

Kid Buu wrote:Does the Dragonball series treat its humans with respect?

No, Toryiama only loves Saiyans and that one Namek. :lol:
Krillin can defend this statement.
GT isn't bad, just sucks ass in comparison to the other 2 animes.

Subscribe to me on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/ImmaKrillinYT

User avatar
Bussani
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8041
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:35 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by Bussani » Sat May 07, 2011 9:31 pm

SRB2Unleashed wrote:
Kid Buu wrote:Does the Dragonball series treat its humans with respect?

No, Toryiama only loves Saiyans and that one Namek. :lol:
Krillin can defend this statement.
Kuririn--don't get me started on Kuririn. He's killed off twice so Goku has something to get angry about and someone to avenge. My brother and I actually call any character who gets kicked around while the other characters do well "The Kuririn". In fact, it seems we're not the only ones...
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!

User avatar
SRB2Unleashed
Regular
Posts: 717
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:06 am

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by SRB2Unleashed » Sat May 07, 2011 9:34 pm

Bussani wrote:
SRB2Unleashed wrote:
Kid Buu wrote:Does the Dragonball series treat its humans with respect?

No, Toryiama only loves Saiyans and that one Namek. :lol:
Krillin can defend this statement.
Kuririn--don't get me started on Kuririn. He's killed off twice so Goku has something to get angry about and someone to avenge. My brother and I actually call any character who gets kicked around while the other characters do well "The Kuririn". In fact, it seems we're not the only ones...
Krillin started OFF as a character, ended up as a plot device (he was even a plot device when he was trying to avenge Yamcha) then in the Buu saga, was his own character, only to become a plot device, then in GT...he was a plot device and they ended his character on an unlucky note for him.
GT isn't bad, just sucks ass in comparison to the other 2 animes.

Subscribe to me on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/ImmaKrillinYT

User avatar
Piccolo Daimao
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8749
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by Piccolo Daimao » Sun May 08, 2011 7:01 am

I'd say, apart from Bulma...no. They're mostly all stereotypes. Even Bulma, who had a prominent role at first, is basically the reason for the entire story and helps out the heroes with her invention, is vain, promiscuous, short-fused, bitchy and gets repeatedly felt up by Roshi.

Chi-Chi's entire role is basically a lovestruck little girl who holds a seven year-long infatuation for a boy who touched her vaj, and after that, she plays the generic overbearing strict mother who does nothing of worth in the series other than yell at Goku and try to get a good education for her son, which is probably why, in such a masculine and action-oriented series, she's seen as "the bad guy". Even if she's super-strong, her only fight is against Goku, where she's defeated in one blow and never fights again.

Lunch's good self is a complete ditzy pin-up girl who, at first, is tricked into wearing sexy lingerie for Roshi. Her bad self isn't that bad really. She's not really feminine, sexualized or shafted into the background mother role (well, she's pretty much written out of the story post-23rd TB), the gags involving her aren't sexual and she actually mellows out over the course of the series. She's got a temper, but it's not to the point of being bitchy like Bulma. So I guess Lunch's bad self is the second-best treated female in the series, behind Uranai Baba.

#18's a complete ice queen who ends up settling down out of convenience for a horny loser, and then she's just a background mother who does nothing of worth in the series.

Videl plays the hot-tempered, manipulative bitch, gets the crap beaten out of her by Spopovich and predictably ends up marrying Gohan and bearing his child.

Ran-Fan's a ditzy manipulator who uses her body and the fact that she's a woman to her advantage.

Pan's...meh. She's a brat, and she doesn't have enough screentime to get demoted to useless background character.

But I agree with TripleRach that Uranai Baba's one of the better treated females in the series. I'd say she's the best treated female in the series, because she's stereotyped the least. I mean, yeah, she's supposed to be a mystical old crone, but, as TripleRach said, she's never sexualized (I just put a disgusting image in your head, didn't I?) or turned into a background mother. And she at least does something important at the end of the series by bringing Vegeta back to Earth.
Last edited by Piccolo Daimao on Mon May 09, 2011 3:16 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.

User avatar
Ashura
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 763
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 8:05 pm

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by Ashura » Sun May 08, 2011 5:12 pm

I think this discussion is a bit of a double standard, because as stereotypical as some of the female characters in Dragon Ball are, there are some outright TERRIBLE men in there, far worse than how the ladies are treated. Even those characters progress certain ways, for better or for worse.

-Roshi himself's whole character is based off of being a lech, and by the time Z rolls around that and poop jokes are pretty much all he's good for since his role as wise old man who trains the main characters has been completed.
-Oolong starts out as Roshi without even the wise old man who's not all bad rhetoric.
-Mr. Satan starts out being a stereotype of a professional wrestler who takes credit for something he didn't do... and I think in the end turns out to be a pretty good guy and a caring grandfather.
-In general, there are downright evil characters who have no motivation other than being evil.
-Even Goku himself grows from being a naive child to being shown as not only greedy but also self serving (letting people live so he can fight them again while putting the entire world in danger), as well as willing to use lecherous intentions to get stuff that he wants. (IE: Offering out Bulma right in front of Vegeta during the Buu saga.)

It's not like all the characters began the series as altruistic heroes. The main thrust of the show all the way through the beginning of Z is is that Goku meets a bunch of bad guys and then turns them into his friends.

I think Bulma in specifics was shown as both clever, smart and caring /as well as/ manipulative and willing to use her wiles to get what she wanted. The second half being something she grew out of as the story progressed and developed... that's a dynamic character. People don't just exist in one way, and they also don't stay the same forever. This series ran so long that almost all of the characters grew in some way, for good or bad. Sure, she got married... but was continuously shown as being capable and takes over Capsule Corp and actually grew out of using her looks for things.

Chichi becomes mother incarnate... The June Cleaver of DB. I would have more of a problem with this if that's the only kind of mother Dragonball portrayed, but between Bulma and Chichi they cover the basis of all types of families. Bulma even covers the strong, single mother role in the alternate timeline Trunks comes from, so DB covers a lot of different kinds of family types, not just one.

I would say that Videl gets the short end of the stick, but she doesn't exist in the series long enough to get the kind of development Bulma and Chichi get.

I don't want to sound like I think these are all absolutely amazing portrayals of women, but I will say that almost ALL of the characters in the series could've been developed better including the women, and that the women weren't treated too badly in the context of the show, its general makeup, and the times it was created.

I actually find it pretty amazing a shounen show protrays so many different types of families.

One thing I will say, though, that this discussion has only touched on; While I don't think the girls in Dragonball were portrayed badly when compared to the men as far as characterization goes, I will say that -- with maybe the exception of 18 -- they were never really shown as being capable of being equal fighters to the men. Or the ones that started out as fairly strong were never developed as fighters to the point that even Goku's friends like Kuririn were. You can say it's a shonen series, true, but Dragonball would've been truly progressive if it had a female main character along the lines of Piccolo or even Tenshinhan. This is something that seemed like Toriyama might've changed if he continued past volume 42, and a lot of other mangaka such as Oda seem to be trying to do. (He also doesn't seem against it; see DB Online.)

One interesting thing to think about is that Toriyama ended the series as though the storyline could've continued. My thought is after the final Budoukai, the implication is that Young Pan could've become the new hero of the series akin to Young Goku and Gohan. She IS shown as a capable fighter, maybe moreso capable than Goten since she punches him out in one of the final scenes in the anime.
My favorite movie henchman is Sancho.

Follow my stupid crap on Twitter. Please note, I do not have time to reply to any PMs about color correction methods anymore; sorry about that.

[ Hoyoyo! Please pick up our Dr. Slump DVD! ]

kemuri07
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 3:09 am

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by kemuri07 » Sun May 08, 2011 5:56 pm

- they were never really shown as being capable of being equal fighters to the men. Or the ones that started out as fairly strong were never developed as fighters to the point that even Goku's friends like Kuririn were.
But that's the case for almost all of the DB characters that aren't saiyans.

I think it's important to keep in mind who DB is made for: Boys. So it makes complete sense that the heroes of DB reflect that. If DB was made for girls in mind, then obviously Pan, Chi-Chi, 18, and any other female fighters would have been far more stronger than they are currently.

User avatar
Kendamu
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 7000
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:31 am
Location: The Martial Arts World

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by Kendamu » Sun May 08, 2011 6:38 pm

What?! A teenage girl uses her looks and vague promises of sex to get what she wants?! That never happens (all the 'effing time) in real life!

What?! A woman becoming a mother?! That's sexist!! And (somehow) racist!! That's just a stereotype! In real life human babies (and their parents) are born every time someone laughs at a gag manga!!

Seriously. What next? "Dragonball is racist against human beings because aliens take the spotlight away from poor Yamcha, who always contributed so much to the comic before!!!"

Not every little series featuring women needs to have them all be Trinity and Laura Croft. Sometimes it's okay to be a mother/super scientist who exploited her sexuality when she was a dumb teenager to just be a woman who works on very important world-saving technologies for the most advanced and powerful corporation on Earth.

Sometimes it's okay to just settle down and be a mother/housewife dedicated to raising her children after being the heiress to a powerful King who got caught up in a few big adventures involving dinosaurs and a whole mountain being on fire before going on to becoming one of the 8 most powerful martial artists on Earth.

Sometimes it's okay to break the bonds of slavery to a mad scientist so yo, your brother, and your new friend can go on a crazy road trip, fight some of the most powerful people in the universe for fun, get chased down and absorbed by a super powerful bio-weapon, get burped back up, and go on to becoming a wife and mother while still having time on the side to enter the world's biggest martial arts tournament and take a fall for the most popular fighter in the world.

Sometimes it's okay to be a high school girl who fights crime on the side and... well, you should get my point by now! They've all outdone every real life man I've ever met.

User avatar
BlazingFiddlesticks
I Live Here
Posts: 2103
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:48 pm

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by BlazingFiddlesticks » Sun May 08, 2011 7:41 pm

^

This is true.

That and Buu-era Bulma and Videl are probably two of the more intelligent characters in the series anyway. :?
JulieYBM wrote:
Pannaliciour wrote:Reading all the comments and interviews, my conclusion is: nobody knows what the hell is going on.
Just like Dragon Ball since Chapter #4.
son veku wrote:
Metalwario64 wrote:
BlazingFiddlesticks wrote:Kingdom Piccolo
Where is that located?
Canada

CatouttaHell
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1164
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:26 pm
Location: Mount Paozu
Contact:

Re: Does the Dragonball series treat its woman with respect?

Post by CatouttaHell » Sun May 08, 2011 7:42 pm

Kendamu wrote:*Long post*
Wow, I never actually thought about it that way. Very good points. :D
Rocketman wrote:Where you born unable to understand jokes or is this the result of years of hard training?

Post Reply