Is GT really inconsistent?
- MCDaveG
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5762
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 5:54 pm
- Location: Prague, Czechia
- Contact:
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
I think that Movie 1 can easily fit into the anime. If the biggest problem in question is that it happens before anime and nobody knows about Gohan in the first Z episodes.....
Yeah, why not? Nobody remembers that fail with Goku's spaceship in ''canon'' of the anime series???
Yeah, why not? Nobody remembers that fail with Goku's spaceship in ''canon'' of the anime series???
FighterZ, Street Fighter 6, Mortal Kombat: Funky_Strudel
PS5: Dynamixx88
Trust me, I'm millenial and a designer.
PS5: Dynamixx88
Trust me, I'm millenial and a designer.
-
KiddoCabbusses
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 4:18 am
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
On a random note, I would like to bring up that I recently went and emulated some fan translations of Famicom Dragonball games. "Kyoushuu Saiya-jin" had an alternate Garlic Jr. story take where the heroes who were alive during the training arc teamed up to kill him before he could become immortal with the Dragon Balls, and "Ressen Jinzou Ningen" had a take on the Cooler story where he seeks out the Dragon Balls and kidnaps Bulma for some reason. "Super Butoden 2" also had a very different Bojack story from how the movie played out,.Luke Groundwalker wrote:Not really.monster wrote:GT has movie characters in the show right?
That brings with it a whole load of inconsistency.
People wouldn't notice these plot holes in the first place if they found the series entertaining.
The only movie character in GT is Cooler, which his movie could easily fit in the three-year timeskip.
Though it might be a case of the character existing in-universe while his movie doesn't, in which he died by other means.
I think it'd be a good idea to get a good list of these alternate story takes.
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
Well, the spaceship thing is a flat-out plothole. The entire Movie #1 is a plothole if you try to take into account the main anime and shouldn't even be mentioned again in the anime canon, but it then brings it back in the form of an arc and just muddles things again.MCDaveG wrote:I think that Movie 1 can easily fit into the anime. If the biggest problem in question is that it happens before anime and nobody knows about Gohan in the first Z episodes.....
Yeah, why not? Nobody remembers that fail with Goku's spaceship in ''canon'' of the anime series???
And there are numerous points that people have made about why Movie #1 can't fit into the anime canon. About why most, if not all, of the movies can't fit into the anime canon. Movie #9 is probably the closest you'll ever get to validly including a movie into the anime canon without making ridiculous explanations to explain away plotholes and inconsistencies (since you can practically explain every single plothole or inconsistency in every fiction), and even then, there is dispute among certain things.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
That initself is an anime induced plothole, that, like almost every hole that Toei creates, is completely disregarded as if it never happened once something in the actual "canon" story contradicts it.MCDaveG wrote:I think that Movie 1 can easily fit into the anime. If the biggest problem in question is that it happens before anime and nobody knows about Gohan in the first Z episodes.....
Yeah, why not? Nobody remembers that fail with Goku's spaceship in ''canon'' of the anime series???
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
I think GT has more logic problems, than actual plot-holes. People seem to confuse the two.
It is in his character to be rude and a bit crass. He's a hick, with no formal education. That is Son Goku. That is who he is.
Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.
-DemonRin
Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.
-DemonRin
- Casual Matt
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
Don't forget, though. The Black Star Dragon Balls scatter across the entire galaxy after use and the planet they were used on is destroyed unless they are brought back together within a year.Fox666 wrote:Namek is only an example. There is moments in the Cell of Majin Boo saga which they needed the Dragon Balls.Cipher wrote:Because they didn't exist in the Namek arc. They would still have been deactivated. It's also possible they were forgotten even by God/Piccolo.• Why nobody ever mentioned these new Dragon Balls before? Why they needed to travel to namek to search for the namekian Dragon Balls?
Seems like the type of thing to avoid as long as there's another option. And in those stories Dende was still kicking around and Earth's Dragon Balls were still active.
I can totally imagine baby Nappa having a moustache.Necrosaber wrote:I'll mention the unlikelihood of Nappa being born with a mustache
That was only a small cameo, anyway.Luke Groundwalker wrote:Not really.monster wrote:GT has movie characters in the show right?
That brings with it a whole load of inconsistency.
People wouldn't notice these plot holes in the first place if they found the series entertaining.
The only movie character in GT is Cooler, which his movie could easily fit in the three-year timeskip.
Doesn't Goku say that it was badly damaged but there was enough to salvage? Admittedly that's not a perfect explanation since the space pod seemed to be pretty thoroughly destroyed, but if that line was made for the anime it seems they at least tried to explain it.Piccolo Daimao wrote:Well, the spaceship thing is a flat-out plothole. The entire Movie #1 is a plothole if you try to take into account the main anime and shouldn't even be mentioned again in the anime canon, but it then brings it back in the form of an arc and just muddles things again.MCDaveG wrote:I think that Movie 1 can easily fit into the anime. If the biggest problem in question is that it happens before anime and nobody knows about Gohan in the first Z episodes.....
Yeah, why not? Nobody remembers that fail with Goku's spaceship in ''canon'' of the anime series???
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
It may be a problem, but it's not a reason to avoid it when you are facing a danger like Majin Boo. Goku wasted his time on Earth because of the radar, wouldn't Mr. Popo have mentioned "hey, maybe we don't need to risk Goku or Trunks lives, we have another set of Dragon Balls".Casual Matt wrote:Don't forget, though. The Black Star Dragon Balls scatter across the entire galaxy after use and the planet they were used on is destroyed unless they are brought back together within a year.
Seems like the type of thing to avoid as long as there's another option. And in those stories Dende was still kicking around and Earth's Dragon Balls were still active.
Or better than that, the radar which they had in the temple would have picked these Dragon Balls. Of course the Dragon Balls weren't hidden or anything, all you needed was to enter that open room which all of the series cast was standing next to...
And I may be forgetting something, but how these Dragon Balls still existed after Piccolo gone to hell?
- Luke Groundwalker
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 4:20 am
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
They didn't, that was the purpose of him going to Hell.Fox666 wrote:And I may be forgetting something, but how these Dragon Balls still existed after Piccolo gone to hell?
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
Okay, I watched that scene, and apparently Piccolo doesn't have a halo over his head or anything. So I ask the opposite question, why would the Dragon Balls cease to exist if Piccolo didn't actually "died"? When he was revived in Kaio's planet, Kami-sama and the Dragon Balls returned as soon as the halo over his head disappeared and being the other world didn't changed anything. Well, in fact, Kami-sama used to travel to the other world...
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
Paragus also appeared, which logically means Broly existed in some capacity.Luke Groundwalker wrote:Not really.monster wrote:GT has movie characters in the show right?
That brings with it a whole load of inconsistency.
People wouldn't notice these plot holes in the first place if they found the series entertaining.
The only movie character in GT is Cooler, which his movie could easily fit in the three-year timeskip.
Though it might be a case of the character existing in-universe while his movie doesn't, in which he died by other means.
CatouttaHell wrote:I guess he's just impossibly powerful and he now gets thrills from letting things go as much to hell as possible before busting out his ultimate power and ending the villain or some shit.
- Luke Groundwalker
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 4:20 am
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
Huh? Since when? I don't ever recall seeing Paragus in GT.Nazi Cola wrote:Paragus also appeared, which logically means Broly existed in some capacity.Luke Groundwalker wrote:Not really.monster wrote:GT has movie characters in the show right?
That brings with it a whole load of inconsistency.
People wouldn't notice these plot holes in the first place if they found the series entertaining.
The only movie character in GT is Cooler, which his movie could easily fit in the three-year timeskip.
Though it might be a case of the character existing in-universe while his movie doesn't, in which he died by other means.
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
I do believe he was one of the cameo villains shown coming out of Hell.Luke Groundwalker wrote: Huh? Since when? I don't ever recall seeing Paragus in GT.
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
I think he's a one of the very tiny background characters in those television news shots of all the villains coming out of Hell. Which is also the same and only place Coola appears. I've never put much stock into those shots.NeoKING wrote:I do believe he was one of the cameo villains shown coming out of Hell.
- Casual Matt
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
He was still dead. He died when the Earth exploded. He stayed behind so the Black Star Dragon Balls would disappear when he died.Fox666 wrote:Okay, I watched that scene, and apparently Piccolo doesn't have a halo over his head or anything. So I ask the opposite question, why would the Dragon Balls cease to exist if Piccolo didn't actually "died"? When he was revived in Kaio's planet, Kami-sama and the Dragon Balls returned as soon as the halo over his head disappeared and being the other world didn't changed anything. Well, in fact, Kami-sama used to travel to the other world...
When he got sent to Hell he lost his Halo because... well, apparantly in GT people in Hell don't get halos. That is a contradiction with what we see in Z but not with itself.
- Luke Groundwalker
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 4:20 am
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
Eh I don't think so. Unless people have pictorial proof I'm gonna call bull on this. I don't own the DVDs to check myself unfortunately.
- TheDevilsCorpse
- Moderator
- Posts: 11378
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
- Contact:
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
I'm pretty sure Paragus isn't in GT:


He is, however, in DBZ Movie 12:



He is, however, in DBZ Movie 12:

- Herms
- Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 10550
- Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
- Location: Jupiter
- Contact:
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
I love how Gozu and Mezu are out attacking Earth along with the bad guys.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.
- Chibi Gohan
- Regular
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:31 am
- Location: Florida
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
Metallitron can fly?
I have a Dragon Ball collection of sorts which can be seen here.
- Luke Groundwalker
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 4:20 am
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
Lol I just noticed this too, funny shit. Would be even more funny if they were drawn better and clearer like the Fusion Reborn cameos.Herms wrote:I love how Gozu and Mezu are out attacking Earth along with the bad guys.
Re: Is GT really inconsistent?
LOLHerms wrote:I love how Gozu and Mezu are out attacking Earth along with the bad guys.
Funny I didn't even noticed that "detail" until nowChibi Gohan wrote:Metallitron can fly?










