Character derailment
Re: Character derailment
It was the Bad Man shirt. Irresistible.
Re: Character derailment
No amount of money in the world changes the fact that she's a stone cold bitch.Insertclevername wrote: Oh, the cruel fate of being married to a highly attractive billionaire women your age while living in her big ol' house.![]()
- Insertclevername
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3208
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:27 pm
- Location: Eastern Zone 439
Re: Character derailment
With a nice ass.Vice wrote:No amount of money in the world changes the fact that she's a stone cold bitch.Insertclevername wrote: Oh, the cruel fate of being married to a highly attractive billionaire women your age while living in her big ol' house.![]()
She really isn't stone cold at all. Just sorta full of her self. A bitch sure, but not heartless.
Last edited by Insertclevername on Thu Apr 04, 2013 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cipher wrote:Also, you can seriously like whatever and still get laid. That's a revelation that'll hit you at some point.
Re: Character derailment
I wouldn't say it's derailment so much as it was a wasted opportunity, but I've been thinking lately about 18 playing a larger role in the Buu arc. A woman comes back front and center since, really, the Piccolo Daimao arc, and she kicks ass. Adjust the power scale where Buu doesn't demolish her and there you go. She's at least as strong as Piccolo, right?
Keen Observation of Dragon Ball Z Movie 4's Climax wrote:Slug shits to see the genki
- RandomGuy96
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8881
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
- Location: San Diego, California, USA
Re: Character derailment
She's nowhere near as strong since he went into the ROSAT. Piccolo's almost certainly several times stronger by the Buu arc.
The Monkey King wrote:It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWokeRandomGuy96 wrote:He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.
Re: Character derailment
Well, if the point about the base Saiyans in BoG is true than he is probably the same strength relative to the Super Saiyans as he was in the Cell Games. Or at least on a completely different tier than her.
Re: Character derailment
It's sarcasm. Every time you try to point out how monstrous it is that Bulma made Yamcha stay under the same house as the guy who orchestrated his and his friends' murders, someone always toddles along and says "Vegeta never killed any of them!"ABED wrote:I don't know if this is a genuine argument or sarcasm. His underling did all of that on his command and if he had defeated the Z team, what do you think he would've done with every Earthling? Also, it's well established that Vegeta murdered mountains of people, children included.Nikkolas wrote:Vegeta never killed anyone okay? He only had Nappa do it.
And he only attempted to murder every last man, woman and child on Earth because he threw a temper tantrum about Goku being a challenge.
It's really kinda disgusting.
Re: Character derailment
That didn't happen though. We don't even see her actively pursueing Vegeta in filler, and certainly not to spite Yamcha. There's even no mention of him cheating (outside of Future Trunks mentioning it).DBZAOTA482 wrote:Of course, Vegeta's a victim of the circumstance. Bulma probably sought out Vegeta to spite Yamcha for supposedly cheating on her (anime filler I think touches upon this) and Vegeta was the first guy to treat her with respect instead of appeasing to her narcissistic mentality. The fact that she saw him shirtless probably helps.
And Vegeta was the first guy to treat her with respect'? If anything, she had to teach him how to treat her with respect.
Well, didn't the Namekians stay at Bulma's house as well? They have even better reason to object to Vegeta's presence.Nikkolas wrote:It's sarcasm. Every time you try to point out how monstrous it is that Bulma made Yamcha stay under the same house as the guy who orchestrated his and his friends' murders, someone always toddles along and says "Vegeta never killed any of them!"
It's really kinda disgusting.
But the group had no qualms about Vegeta staying at CC. No one even suggested the possiblity that Vegeta might turn on them and kill them all. So maybe they thought he wasn't that evil anymore, a reluctant ally who didn't seem to be dangerous.
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20476
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
Re: Character derailment
I never thought of the Namekians. In any event, it's not like they had better options.
Everyone on the show is way too quick to trust.
Everyone on the show is way too quick to trust.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
Re: Character derailment
I dunno about the anime, but I know TFS made a nice little segment on itDBZAOTA482 wrote: Of course, Vegeta's a victim of the circumstance. Bulma probably sought out Vegeta to spite Yamcha for supposedly cheating on her (anime filler I think touches upon this) and Vegeta was the first guy to treat her with respect instead of appeasing to her narcissistic mentality. The fact that she saw him shirtless probably helps.
Re: Character derailment
I think it's more like Bulma just loved Goku but she couldn't have Goku so Vegeta was the next best thing.
That's character consistency right there.
That's character consistency right there.
Re: Character derailment
She didn't make Yamcha stay there, she let him. If he didn't like Vegeta living their he could have gone back to his own place. It's her parents' house, and as long as they're good with it, she can bloody well let whoever she wants crash there.Nikkolas wrote:
It's sarcasm. Every time you try to point out how monstrous it is that Bulma made Yamcha stay under the same house as the guy who orchestrated his and his friends' murders, someone always toddles along and says "Vegeta never killed any of them!"
It's really kinda disgusting.
So I don't see what is so disgusting about it.
Also, people are going to say "Vegeta never killed any of them!" every time you imply that he did. You're just going to have to either accept that, or stop implying that.
Last edited by Saiga on Fri Apr 05, 2013 5:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
I'm re-watching Dragon Ball GT in full on my blog. Check it out if you're interested in my thoughts on the series as I watch through it!
Re: Character derailment
Hmm? Trunks and Piccolo were the ones who didn't want Cell complete. Trunks would have easily have taken Bulma's idea to stop Gero. Piccolo in the Trunks arc and in the Android arc are not the same person.Gaffer Tape wrote:
Then prepare to kill me, at least for the former, but what bothers me even more than that is that characters pretty much just shrug off this complete act of betrayal rather than hurl Vegeta into the sun before he causes any more catastrophic damage. But as for the rest of the characters, their complete idiocy of a "plan" coupled with their ridiculous selfishness at the beginning of the arc by saying, "Yeah, sure, we'll let Dr. Gero's evil plan come to fruition or else we'll be bored," only to pull a 180 (except for Vegeta) and say, "No, we can't let Cell's evil plan come to fruition because that's irresponsible." Puh-leeze.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.
Re: Character derailment
The 180 actually happens before Cell. Piccolo and rest wanted to stop Dr. Gero from reactivating 17 and 18, despite that they defeated the first two relatively easy.Kid Buu wrote:Hmm? Trunks and Piccolo were the ones who didn't want Cell complete. Trunks would have easily have taken Bulma's idea to stop Gero. Piccolo in the Trunks arc and in the Android arc are not the same person.Gaffer Tape wrote:
Then prepare to kill me, at least for the former, but what bothers me even more than that is that characters pretty much just shrug off this complete act of betrayal rather than hurl Vegeta into the sun before he causes any more catastrophic damage. But as for the rest of the characters, their complete idiocy of a "plan" coupled with their ridiculous selfishness at the beginning of the arc by saying, "Yeah, sure, we'll let Dr. Gero's evil plan come to fruition or else we'll be bored," only to pull a 180 (except for Vegeta) and say, "No, we can't let Cell's evil plan come to fruition because that's irresponsible." Puh-leeze.
Re: Character derailment
Somehow I can't see him reasoning like this with ReaCoom which was Gohan in a somewhat similar position. What about Freeza?Well, Gohan was always very reluctant to fight unless he was forced to act and Cell was probably the first time he felt as though he was in the position to have the villain listen to him given it's his first real battle and it's to the death. Not to mention his latent powers were not brought upon the stuff that happens to him but rather the injustice he sees before him, which is why 16's death put it all to a climax (the callousness in how Cell treated the cyborg).
It is in his character to be rude and a bit crass. He's a hick, with no formal education. That is Son Goku. That is who he is.
Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.
-DemonRin
Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.
-DemonRin
- DBZAOTA482
- Banned
- Posts: 6995
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Character derailment
1. He had no choice but to fight whenever he fought back, and it was made known that daddy was going to be coming home. Also, he didn't fight Freeza alone.DBZ Mick wrote:Somehow I can't see him reasoning like this with ReaCoom which was Gohan in a somewhat similar position. What about Freeza?Well, Gohan was always very reluctant to fight unless he was forced to act and Cell was probably the first time he felt as though he was in the position to have the villain listen to him given it's his first real battle and it's to the death. Not to mention his latent powers were not brought upon the stuff that happens to him but rather the injustice he sees before him, which is why 16's death put it all to a climax (the callousness in how Cell treated the cyborg).
2. He wanted to revive Piccolo and co. not to appease to his Saiyan thirst for adrenaline.
fadeddreams5 wrote:Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.
I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20476
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
Re: Character derailment
Why does it matter that he knew his dad was coming? He didn't know when.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
- Gaffer Tape
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 6128
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Character derailment
None of them wanted Cell complete except for Vegeta. Piccolo tried to get #17 and #18 out of there when Cell showed up, as did #16. Trunks tried beating up Vegeta to stop it. Tenshinhan nearly sacrificed his own life to do so. Kuririn struggled with destroying #18 entirely to stop it from happening. And like Mischi says, it was pretty much the same thing when they all try to head off Dr. Gero returning to his laboratory. If by you saying that Piccolo isn't the same person means his assimilation of God, then that doesn't apply there, yet he was leading the charge to stop #17 and #18 from being activated.Kid Buu wrote:Hmm? Trunks and Piccolo were the ones who didn't want Cell complete. Trunks would have easily have taken Bulma's idea to stop Gero. Piccolo in the Trunks arc and in the Android arc are not the same person.
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:
MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 2/16/26!)
Current Episode: The Airtight Case for Slice of Life! - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 1
MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 2/16/26!)
Current Episode: The Airtight Case for Slice of Life! - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 1
Re: Character derailment
Except she didn't 'love' Goku and it was never implied in the series. Yes, I know she thought he was 'hot' or something when he got older and then later on on Namek she made this comment about him, but it was never implied that she loved him in a romantic way and those comments were innocent enough.Nikkolas wrote:I think it's more like Bulma just loved Goku but she couldn't have Goku so Vegeta was the next best thing.
That's character consistency right there.
And about character consistency, it depends on whether you think Vegeta is an upgrade or downgrade from Yamcha.
Re: Character derailment
Well I was half-joking. I ship Goku and Bulma but I'm fully aware there's little to support them in canon.VyeRo wrote:Except she didn't 'love' Goku and it was never implied in the series. Yes, I know she thought he was 'hot' or something when he got older and then later on on Namek she made this comment about him, but it was never implied that she loved him in a romantic way and those comments were innocent enough.Nikkolas wrote:I think it's more like Bulma just loved Goku but she couldn't have Goku so Vegeta was the next best thing.
That's character consistency right there.
And about character consistency, it depends on whether you think Vegeta is an upgrade or downgrade from Yamcha.
As for being n upgrade or downgrade from Yamcha, the situations are different. She never had a kid with Yamcha somehow. Maybe she forgot to take the pill when she was with Vegeta that one night or whatever
I would say Yamcha was certainly a better boyfriend in the beginning as she was an actual boyfriend. Vegeta became a decent husband (they did get married by Buu, right?) eventually.
Well until he started blowing up innocent people in front of her. Logically that would damage a relationship.







