Fanmanga - DB Multiverse

[rereboy]

We state that its on purpose because it actually matters... It means that he could have used a more pleasant style in those panels but chose not to because he probably felt it would be funnier this way. Its fine to not like it but to point out that its bad art when its actually meant to look very silly instead of good doesn't seem to make much sense.

[Fionordequester]

It's not needed though, and doesn't serve a purpose. I mean really, you don't see stuff like Tom and Jerry doing that, do you?

[dbzfan7]

I really hope the fight isn't too short. This looks like it could be really funny.

[Fionordequester]

One thing though, since someone didn't like the nitpicking from way back...and I can kinda sort of understand now...but anyways, I do agree that the rest of the complaints are sort of nitpicking.

[Marco Polo]

It means that he could have used a more pleasant style in those panels

lol, nice one.

[Godo]

I'm going to have to agree here: Just because it's "silly" doesn't mean it doesn't look -bad-. You can do goofy, silly, weird, kooky, and funny while still being well drawn. This artist does not seem to be able to do this, mostly because the artist isn't really all that good. All of their art for the characters uses references from the manga and show, so when they have to draw something more original and goofy, they have nothing to work with. As such, it looks dramatically lower in quality.

Something else you'll notice is that the artist rarely ever incorporates dynamic angles. It's usually static shots from the front, back, side, etc. The framing is boring and it's all so... boring.

People keep saying that as if it were a good excuse. Newsflash: on purpose or not, crappy art is crappy art. Silly doesn't mean it has to look like crap.

When did anyone say that the art was good in those shots? I don't recall anyone saying that, or even using it as an excuse to why the art is acceptable as it is.

The general consensus seems to be that, just to state, it is drawn that way on purpose, so why bother. Artistic choice, whatever.

I don't see why the art is something to even bother with. They will change artists soon anyways, and eventually something crappier will show up.
Considering, though, what has happened until recently with the change of artists, I believe that the final battle will be between stick figures.
Even Gogeta Jr's art deteriorated in detail as time went on. Quantity over quality,

Edit: By the way I would like to say that I personally am not interested one bit in the Dr. Slump universe, nor the other universes that are not directly connected to Dragonball's continuity.
I hope that this fight is over very soon.

[Xyex]

Ugh. People need to stop complaining about the gag art for this chapter. Just because you don't like a style doesn't make it bad. I'm not a fan of the gag style here, either (except on the last reaction panel, it's perfect there) but it's not bad art, it's an artistic choice. Saying that it's bad just because it's not 'quality' style would be like saying that Picasso's art is bad because it's not realistic.

Anyway, LOVE this page! I actually laughed out loud when I saw Arale grab the planet to hit 18 with it. Pure genius. This fight's going to be great and I hope it doesn't end too quickly.

[rereboy]

It means that he could have used a more pleasant style in those panels

lol, nice one.

We have already seen various panels of this artist with very good art. The panels of arale and her gang are especially good. Its not my fault that you choose to ignore that.

[Marco Polo]

It means that he could have used a more pleasant style in those panels

lol, nice one.

We have already seen various panels of this artist with very good art. The panels of arale and her gang are especially good. Its not my fault that you choose to ignore that.

He is only good at drawing Arale and copying a few other characters straight from their original artwork (like Robo). All his other panels are consistently bad.

[rereboy]

He is only good at drawing Arale and copying a few other characters straight from their original artwork (like Robo). All his other panels are consistently bad.

Says the guy who argued that #18's face was drawn incorrectly, only to have "everyone" disagree with him immediately after...

Dude, just chill about the artwork. No need to exaggerate.

[TheGmGoken]

He is only good at drawing Arale and copying a few other characters straight from their original artwork (like Robo). All his other panels are consistently bad.

Says the guy who argued that #18's face was drawn incorrectly, only to have "everyone" disagree with him immediately after.

2 people means "everyone"?

[rereboy]

He is only good at drawing Arale and copying a few other characters straight from their original artwork (like Robo). All his other panels are consistently bad.

Says the guy who argued that #18's face was drawn incorrectly, only to have "everyone" disagree with him immediately after.

2 people means "everyone"?

Hence the quotation marks to indicate that its a figure of speech. Was it really necessary for me to explain that...?

It was 3 people btw (including me) and one of those people was Scarz who seems to be pretty good at drawing. Not to mention that no one actually replied to agree with his view, I believe.

[TheGmGoken]

Hence the quotation marks to indicate that its a figure of speech. Was it really necessary for me to explain that...?

It was 3 people btw (including me) and one of those people was Scarz who seems to be pretty good at drawing. Not to mention that no one actually replied to agree with his view, I believe.

Well I also put the quotations. Even in a figure of speech form. At least 4 I could see that being usable. I didn't count you obviously. No disrespect to Scarz but it still a little bit of people. So to say "everyone" "immediately " is to big of an exaggeration.

[rereboy]

Well I also put the quotations. Even in a figure of speech form. At least 4 I could see that being usable. I didn't count you obviously. No disrespect to Scarz but it still a little bit of people. So to say "everyone" "immediately " is to big of an exaggeration.

By using quotation marks I was, from the start, admitting that I was using an exaggerated expression or figure of speech. What more do you want...?

By the way, I didn't understand half of your post. I know that english is not your first language, but I simply couldn't understand half of it.

[TheGmGoken]

Well I also put the quotations. Even in a figure of speech form. At least 4 I could see that being usable. I didn't count you obviously. No disrespect to Scarz but it still a little bit of people. So to say "everyone" "immediately " is to big of an exaggeration.

By using quotation marks I was, from the start, admitting that I was using an exaggerated expression or figure of speech. What more do you want...?

By the way, I didn't understand half of your post. I know that english is not your first language, but it simply couldn't understand half of it.

I said it was to little.

[rereboy]

Her face being little was not his complain, it was its position. And regarding that, like Scarz said, its not perfect (perfect things are rare) but its correct.

[TheGmGoken]

Her face being little was not his complain, it was its position. And regarding that, like Scarz said, its not perfect (perfect things are rare) but its correct.

When did I say her face was little? I said the amount of people was to little for you to have a legit figure of speech

[rereboy]

Her face being little was not his complain, it was its position. And regarding that, like Scarz said, its not perfect (perfect things are rare) but its correct.

When did I say her face was little? I said the amount of people was to little for you to have a legit figure of speech

Sorry, you are hard to understand.

I don't think you get what a figure of speech essentially is... A figure of speech is the use of a phrase or expression that transcends its literal meaning. That means that when I said everyone, I didn't actually mean everyone. It was an expression, an exaggeration to transmit a point. And one of the reasons why I exaggerated was because he was also exaggerating about the artwork being that bad.

[TheGmGoken]

Her face being little was not his complain, it was its position. And regarding that, like Scarz said, its not perfect (perfect things are rare) but its correct.

When did I say her face was little? I said the amount of people was to little for you to have a legit figure of speech

Sorry, you are hard to understand.

I don't think you get what a figure of speech is... A figure of speech is the use of a phrase or expression that transcends its literal meaning. That means that when I said everyone, I didn't actually mean everyone. It was an expression, an exaggeration to transmit a point. And one of the reasons why I exaggerated was because he was also exaggerating about the artwork being that bad.

I know what that is. But even still 2 people makes it laughable. Had it been 4 maybe....

[rereboy]

Now you are just being silly.