Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.
User avatar
Kamiccolo9
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10371
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:32 pm
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by Kamiccolo9 » Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:16 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:
Vegeta cried cause of how his race was treated and beg Goku to kill Freeza for the Saiyans.
Then I guess Goku gave Vegeta a nice "screw you" when he spared Freeza. Or at least tried to. Well, there was one good thing about that decision at least.
I'm stealing this :lol:
Champion of the 1st Kanzenshuu Short Story Tenkaichi Budokai
Kamiccolo9's Kompendium of Short Stories
Cipher wrote:If Vegeta does not kill Gohan, I will stop illegally streaming the series.
Malik_DBNA wrote:
Scarz wrote:Malik, stop. People are asking me for lewd art of possessed Bra (with Vegeta).
"Achievement Unlocked: Rule 34"

User avatar
Fionordequester
I Live Here
Posts: 2879
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:33 pm

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by Fionordequester » Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:35 pm

Goku went through a brain washer? They sent him to Earth with a mission. Hardly a brain washer. More or less being naturally strong and destructive
Remember that whole thing where the space pod was all "wake up Kakarot. Destroy all life forms!" or something like that? Or was that filler only?
Kataphrut wrote:It's a bit of a Boy Who Cried Wolf situation to me...Basically, the boy shouldn't have cried wolf when the wolves just wanted to Go See Yamcha. If not, they might have gotten some help when the wolves came back to Make the Donuts.
Chuquita wrote:I liken Gokû Black to "guy can't stand his job, so instead of quitting and finding a job he likes, he instead sets fire not only to his workplace so he doesn't have to work there, but tries setting fire to every store in the franchise of that company".

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by TheGmGoken » Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:43 pm

Fionordequester wrote:
Goku went through a brain washer? They sent him to Earth with a mission. Hardly a brain washer. More or less being naturally strong and destructive
Remember that whole thing where the space pod was all "wake up Kakarot. Destroy all life forms!" or something like that? Or was that filler only?
You sure that wasn't dub only? Don't remember it.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by ABED » Sun Dec 29, 2013 5:49 pm

Fionordequester wrote:
Goku went through a brain washer? They sent him to Earth with a mission. Hardly a brain washer. More or less being naturally strong and destructive
Remember that whole thing where the space pod was all "wake up Kakarot. Destroy all life forms!" or something like that? Or was that filler only?
That was filler. Gohan only turned Great Ape once during training.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:04 pm

On the question of "would Vegeta have been better if someone else was raising him?". I think the Buu Saga might say more about Vegeta's true nature than any other saga ever did. By this point, he had been living on Earth with a family for seven years. His upbringing can't really be blamed for anything he does anymore. Then Goku comes back for a day and Babidi lands on Earth:

What Vegeta COULD have done: kill Dabra and Babidi, give Buu's ball to Kaioshin, watch Goku leave as his time runs out, and continue living a life of permanent luxury alongside his wife and kid, except now with the honor of being the savior of the the universe and the strongest being of existence, worshiped by the God of Gods himself.

What Vegeta actually did: sold his soul to the devil, started murdering innocent people, and released the ancient universe destroying demon that the God of Gods had just warned him not to, resulting in his own death as well as the deaths of his family and the entire Earth. All in a vain attempt to outdo a dead man.
I'm stealing this :lol:
Cool, I've never been sigged before. :)
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Fionordequester
I Live Here
Posts: 2879
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:33 pm

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by Fionordequester » Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:12 pm

What Vegeta actually did: sold his soul to the devil, started murdering innocent people, and released the ancient universe destroying demon that the God of Gods had just warned him not to, resulting in his own death as well as the deaths of his family and the entire Earth. All in a vain attempt to outdo a dead man.
To be fair, he was kind of going through a MASSIVE mid-life crisis at that point ("my quest for greatness giving way to this LIFE of mediocrity!")...besides, you forget that he ALSO realizes how wrong he was and sacrifices his own life to save EVERYONE a short time later on that same day. And he has that epiphany when seeing Goku fight Kid Buu...

So really, to have that sort of change going on, there had to be SOME amount of good inside him. This is why I say that he still would've had some sociopathic tendencies, but he wouldn't have been NEARLY as bad.
Kataphrut wrote:It's a bit of a Boy Who Cried Wolf situation to me...Basically, the boy shouldn't have cried wolf when the wolves just wanted to Go See Yamcha. If not, they might have gotten some help when the wolves came back to Make the Donuts.
Chuquita wrote:I liken Gokû Black to "guy can't stand his job, so instead of quitting and finding a job he likes, he instead sets fire not only to his workplace so he doesn't have to work there, but tries setting fire to every store in the franchise of that company".

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by ABED » Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:15 am

The operative word there is "some". Vegeta does some heroic things but he's not a hero. At his best, he's an anti-hero.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Polyphase Avatron
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6643
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:48 am

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by Polyphase Avatron » Mon Dec 30, 2013 7:51 pm

He was definitely a villain in the Saiyan saga. In the Namek saga he went from a villain to an anti-villain to an anti-hero.
Cool stuff that I upload here because Youtube will copyright claim it: https://vimeo.com/user60967147

User avatar
DarkPrince_92
I Live Here
Posts: 3492
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Glendale, CA
Contact:

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by DarkPrince_92 » Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:09 pm

First time watching it though (Wasn't a fan of him back then), he was definitely a Villain for me until Freeza starts trouble.
I am a freelance animator, check out my thangs. ART!

Check my webcomic series Off Guard now on webtoons!

PSN/Steam: MOSLittGaming

Gaming Channel/Socials: MOSLittGaming

User avatar
Kamiccolo9
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10371
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:32 pm
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by Kamiccolo9 » Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:13 pm

I seem to remember him laughing about killing a Namekian village even after Freeza was defeated. I would say that falls squarely into the list of "not a good guy" traits.
Champion of the 1st Kanzenshuu Short Story Tenkaichi Budokai
Kamiccolo9's Kompendium of Short Stories
Cipher wrote:If Vegeta does not kill Gohan, I will stop illegally streaming the series.
Malik_DBNA wrote:
Scarz wrote:Malik, stop. People are asking me for lewd art of possessed Bra (with Vegeta).
"Achievement Unlocked: Rule 34"

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:16 pm

He was also still openly plotting to take over the universe even while working with the heroes. He's still a full on villain in the Namek arc.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:46 pm

He didn't care that his planet, race, and father were destroyed, he didn't mind killing Nappa, the comrade that was in his side literally for his entire life, just because he wasn't strong, and he enjoyed killing entire populations of planets & destroying planets. During & after the Freeza arc, his personality didn't change at all: he just made an alliance with Gohan & co. to beat Freeza & his henchmen so that he can obtain the Dragon Balls, and through them, immortality. After that, he stayed on Earth waiting for Goku to come so that he can kill him, and also so that he can take advantage of the gravity room & spaceship to train & become a Super Saiyan, and after learning about the Artificial Humans, he only made an alliance so that he can fight these new opponents & kill them so that he will be the one who will kill Goku. It was until Future Trunks came and he learned that he was his son that the change begun. But even in the beginning of Boo arc, there was still evil in him, which is evident when he kills innocents so that Goku will fight with him. By the end of Boo arc though, he had turned into a completely good guy, which is evident from his actions in the final battle with Boo, from the fact that he was good enough to participate in the creation of the Super Saiyan God, and from the fact that by the time of GT, he considers himself an Earthling, and takes Goku's place as the Earth's protector.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by ABED » Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:49 pm

I think the most fitting ending for Vegeta would be for him to not return from the dead, but be at peace with his fate. He murdered too many people.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by TheGmGoken » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:31 pm

ABED wrote:I think the most fitting ending for Vegeta would be for him to not return from the dead, but be at peace with his fate. He murdered too many people.
So did Piccolo, Yamcha(not everyone going to.give capsules), and perhaps Tien of most likely off screen. They ALL got to be brought back.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by ABED » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:48 pm

TheGmGoken wrote:
ABED wrote:I think the most fitting ending for Vegeta would be for him to not return from the dead, but be at peace with his fate. He murdered too many people.
So did Piccolo, Yamcha(not everyone going to.give capsules), and perhaps Tenshinhan of most likely off screen. They ALL got to be brought back.
When did Yamcha murder anyone? Tenshinhan was training to be an assassin, but we're never told or shown that he killed anyone. As for Piccolo, I'm more than fine with him paying for his former crimes, in fact, I think GT's ending is fitting. Besides their death toll doesn't come close to Vegeta's. Vegeta has probably racked up a body count that would eclipse Hitler, Stalin, and Mao's combined.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:52 pm

Yamcha was a desert bandit who attacked with a sword. I think it's pretty safe to say he's killed some innocent people. Also, did Piccolo actually kill anyone?
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by ABED » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:55 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:Yamcha was a desert bandit who attacked with a sword. I think it's pretty safe to say he's killed some innocent people. Also, did Piccolo actually kill anyone?
You wonder if Piccolo killed anyone but you're certain Yamcha killed people? It wouldn't matter if Piccolo was successful anyways, he tried to murder Goku and had he succeeded would've killed everyone else.

Yamcha even back then strikes me as someone with a worse bark than bite.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:03 pm

ABED wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:Yamcha was a desert bandit who attacked with a sword. I think it's pretty safe to say he's killed some innocent people. Also, did Piccolo actually kill anyone?
You wonder if Piccolo killed anyone but you're certain Yamcha killed people? It wouldn't matter if Piccolo was successful anyways, he tried to murder Goku and had he succeeded would've killed everyone else.

Yamcha even back then strikes me as someone with a worse bark than bite.
Didn't he try to cleave Goku with a sword BEFORE he knew Goku was sword proof? And he fired at Goku's friends car with a rocket launcher. If this is his standard operating procedure, it's very unlikely he didn't kill anyone. Piccolo, on the other hand, is not shown to have killed anyone. On the contrary, he saved many lives. Him killing everyone else after is also very unlikely, given that after he did kill Goku, he quickly mellowed out, even with no one around to stop him. He also rescued that family in that filler scene. It seems that he just wanted to avenge his past self.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by ABED » Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:13 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:
ABED wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:Yamcha was a desert bandit who attacked with a sword. I think it's pretty safe to say he's killed some innocent people. Also, did Piccolo actually kill anyone?
You wonder if Piccolo killed anyone but you're certain Yamcha killed people? It wouldn't matter if Piccolo was successful anyways, he tried to murder Goku and had he succeeded would've killed everyone else.

Yamcha even back then strikes me as someone with a worse bark than bite.
Didn't he try to cleave Goku with a sword BEFORE he knew Goku was sword proof? And he fired at Goku's friends car with a rocket launcher. If this is his standard operating procedure, it's very unlikely he didn't kill anyone. Piccolo, on the other hand, is not shown to have killed anyone. On the contrary, he saved many lives. Him killing everyone else after is also very unlikely, given that after he did kill Goku, he quickly mellowed out, even with no one around to stop him. He also rescued that family in that filler scene. It seems that he just wanted to avenge his past self.
He probably surmised that Goku was a great warrior and he wasn't trying to blow up the DB gang with the rocket launcher, he was just breaking the vehicle so he could steal their stuff. Again, it baffles me that you think Piccolo is more innocent. He attempted to murder Goku. Avenge his past self, like he was righting a wrong? I have a hard time believing Papaya Island could've been completely evacuated when Piccolo destroyed it.

Regardless of any of this, Vegeta is still not deserving of ever being considered a "good guy". He got off with a slap on the wrist. His crimes are too numerous
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4217
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Do you consider Saiyan Saga and Namek Vegeta a villain?

Post by Kid Buu » Tue Dec 31, 2013 1:06 am

Yes; he's a dick. I'm not really sure why Krilin felt like Vegeta was the lesser of two evils between him and Freeza when the only real difference is that Vegeta looks human.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

Post Reply