Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
El Diabeetus
I Live Here
Posts: 2138
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:07 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by El Diabeetus » Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:15 pm

Fionordequester wrote:So in other words, arguing is pointless....I think.
Is that a reason to halt a contest of wills?

All joking aside, you're probably right there.

More or less, I agree with Ajay on this one. It's pretty much just how Dragon Ball's structured. Freeza arc is my favorite (in the Japanese version of Z, or English version of Kai). Freeza may not be the most original villain of all time. But, he does pull the role of villain off pretty damn well in my opinion. Along with some cool (not meant to be a pun, but probably will be read as one) dialogue to boot like "I promised you didn't? That I would show you a nightmare/terror beyond the horrors of Hell". Freeza is one of the more solid arcs once you get past the filler and all. Probably the most or close second darkest/serious arc (Demon King Piccolo may be close) in the series.

User avatar
Valerius Dover
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1926
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Somewhere

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by Valerius Dover » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:24 pm

Ok, here's one thing that's somewhat baffled me. Aside from Funimation's 16 sagas and 9 Seasons, the other major way to divide the series would be into 3 major thirds that follow a predictable format.

Frieza: Seasons 1-3
Cell: Seasons 4-6
Buu: Seasons 7-9

Why do so many people consider the Vegeta Saga to also be a separate arc when it leads directly into the Dragon Ball hunt on Namek? I don't see how it's any more a separate portion than the Trunks and Androids Sagas, or the Great Saiyaman, World Tournament, and Babidi Sagas.

But, yes, I can say that all three thirds of the series follow a similar format. True Villain doesn't get introduced until 2nd Season in each third (2, 5, and 8), Excuses for Goku to not be around, filler arcs between, and a new Super Saiyan transformation introduced towards the end of each one (although SS3 did come in earlier than the others in their respective arcs). Another exception is Frieza making a brief return early in the Cell arc. So, why separate Saiyan, while it is really just part of the larger Frieza arc?
Now available on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/ValeriusDover

The Internet summed up in four words.
"This sucks. Make more."

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20486
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by ABED » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:27 pm

Valerius Dover wrote:Ok, here's one thing that's somewhat baffled me. Aside from Funimation's 16 sagas and 9 Seasons, the other major way to divide the series would be into 3 major thirds that follow a predictable format.

Frieza: Seasons 1-3
Cell: Seasons 4-6
Buu: Seasons 7-9

Why do so many people consider the Vegeta Saga to also be a separate arc when it leads directly into the Dragon Ball hunt on Namek? I don't see how it's any more a separate portion than the Trunks and Androids Sagas, or the Great Saiyaman, World Tournament, and Babidi Sagas.

But, yes, I can say that all three thirds of the series follow a similar format. True Villain doesn't get introduced until 2nd Season in each third (2, 5, and 8), Excuses for Goku to not be around, filler arcs between, and a new Super Saiyan transformation introduced towards the end of each one (although SS3 did come in earlier than the others in their respective arcs). Another exception is Frieza making a brief return early in the Cell arc. So, why separate Saiyan, while it is really just part of the larger Frieza arc?
The Vegeta arc is a separate arc because it has a beginning, middle, climax, and end. Vegeta by that point in the story has broken away from Freeza.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:43 pm

Valerius Dover wrote:Why do so many people consider the Vegeta Saga to also be a separate arc when it leads directly into the Dragon Ball hunt on Namek?
By that logic, you might as well consider the 22nd Budokai through the Piccolo Junior stuff to all be one arc. I mean, there is a direct lead-in with Piccolo sending Tambourine to collect the Dragon Ball right after the tournament concludes, and after Piccolo is defeated, Goku must immediately start training to defeat his reincarnation/son.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

User avatar
Valerius Dover
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1926
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Somewhere

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by Valerius Dover » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:47 pm

ABED wrote:
Valerius Dover wrote:Ok, here's one thing that's somewhat baffled me. Aside from Funimation's 16 sagas and 9 Seasons, the other major way to divide the series would be into 3 major thirds that follow a predictable format.

Frieza: Seasons 1-3
Cell: Seasons 4-6
Buu: Seasons 7-9

Why do so many people consider the Vegeta Saga to also be a separate arc when it leads directly into the Dragon Ball hunt on Namek? I don't see how it's any more a separate portion than the Trunks and Androids Sagas, or the Great Saiyaman, World Tournament, and Babidi Sagas.

But, yes, I can say that all three thirds of the series follow a similar format. True Villain doesn't get introduced until 2nd Season in each third (2, 5, and 8), Excuses for Goku to not be around, filler arcs between, and a new Super Saiyan transformation introduced towards the end of each one (although SS3 did come in earlier than the others in their respective arcs). Another exception is Frieza making a brief return early in the Cell arc. So, why separate Saiyan, while it is really just part of the larger Frieza arc?
The Vegeta arc is a separate arc because it has a beginning, middle, climax, and end. Vegeta by that point in the story has broken away from Freeza.
Hmm, I suppose that makes sense. I guess I just have a different way of looking at things. I think the auto-emoticon screwed up and gave me a 8) when I really just wanted 8 with a parenthesis following it. :lol:
Now available on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/ValeriusDover

The Internet summed up in four words.
"This sucks. Make more."

User avatar
Valerius Dover
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1926
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Somewhere

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by Valerius Dover » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:50 pm

TheDevilsCorpse wrote:
Valerius Dover wrote:Why do so many people consider the Vegeta Saga to also be a separate arc when it leads directly into the Dragon Ball hunt on Namek?
By that logic, you might as well consider the 22nd Budokai through the Piccolo Junior stuff to all be one arc. I mean, there is a direct lead-in with Piccolo sending Tambourine to collect the Dragon Ball right after the tournament concludes, and after Piccolo is defeated, Goku must immediately start training to defeat his reincarnation/son.
I see a point there, though I was specifically referring to Dragon Ball Z where the formula is more predictable.
Not to say Dragon Ball wasn't, too, though.
It pretty much alternated between Dragon Ball hunts and tournaments.
But yeah, I agree that that's a good point.
Last edited by Valerius Dover on Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Now available on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/ValeriusDover

The Internet summed up in four words.
"This sucks. Make more."

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:56 pm

TheDevilsCorpse wrote:By that logic, you might as well consider the 22nd Budokai through the Piccolo Junior stuff to all be one arc.
Shueisha views it like that actually.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:05 pm

DBZGTKOSDH wrote:
TheDevilsCorpse wrote:By that logic, you might as well consider the 22nd Budokai through the Piccolo Junior stuff to all be one arc.
Shueisha views it like that actually.
Not in any of the arc divisions Hujio's bothered to post up. Or at least, not in the ones I've paid attention to.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:19 pm

TheDevilsCorpse wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:
TheDevilsCorpse wrote:By that logic, you might as well consider the 22nd Budokai through the Piccolo Junior stuff to all be one arc.
Shueisha views it like that actually.
Not in any of the arc divisions Hujio's bothered to post up. Or at least, not in the ones I've paid attention to.
Hujio referred to the arc divisions that before the Colored Edition of the manga.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:46 pm

Ah. I don't really care how the Full Color releases are labeled. The other 2-3 label versions by Shueisha are much more uniform and belong to the original releases.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:48 pm

TheDevilsCorpse wrote:Ah. I don't really care how the Full Color releases are labeled. The other 2-3 label versions by Shueisha are much more uniform and belong to the original releases.
I was just saying. Personally, I view this as the generic arc division, while I've made my own detailed division through the others from Shueisha.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by TheGmGoken » Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:01 pm

No. I don't see how they're a rehash. Dbz arcs follow a format. Boo arc is a rehash of Saiyan arc because Goku came from Death with a big power up(kaioken and Ssj3). Silly to say that right?

User avatar
DonZ
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:33 pm

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by DonZ » Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:26 pm

How the hell is it a rehash ? just because Goku arrived and saved the day?! really?! it's similar, yeah. but it doesn't make the WHOLE arc a rehash.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4261
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by Kid Buu » Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:32 pm

Not the whole arc, but Goku's role in the Ginyu Force part is very similar.

Nappa/Recoome beat up Gohan, Krillin, and Vegeta/Piccolo.

Goku comes and one-shots Nappa/Recoome.

Goku then challenges Vegeta/Ginyu by himself.

Goku loses to Vegeta/Ginyu.

Gohan, Krillin, and Yajirobe/Vegeta have to save Goku now.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by TheGmGoken » Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:42 pm

Kid Buu wrote:Not the whole arc, but Goku's role in the Ginyu Force part is very similar.

Nappa/Recoome beat up Gohan, Krillin, and Vegeta/Piccolo.

Goku comes and one-shots Nappa/Recoome.

Goku then challenges Vegeta/Ginyu by himself.

Goku loses to Vegeta/Ginyu.

Gohan, Krillin, and Yajirobe/Vegeta have to save Goku now.
Honestly to much changes to be similar. Goku didn't one shot Nappa. Goku was going to team uo with Vegeta (cause of Jheese). Ginyu fight nothing like Vegeta's.

User avatar
thatdbzguy
Banned
Posts: 880
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:27 am

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by thatdbzguy » Fri Apr 11, 2014 6:28 am

Fionordequester wrote:Guys, from now on, in every topic DBZGuy makes, until we figure out what's up with him...I'd like to post this stuff...
thatdbzguy wrote:While the Saiyan and Freeza sagas are, for the most part, pretty tightly written, the Cell and Buu sagas don't exactly share that trait, at least not as much as previous sagas.

So in your opinion, which saga do you think is more flawed?
thatdbzguy wrote:I prefer Dragon Ball Z over the original.

Not exactly an "unpopular" opinion, but probably a minority one on this website.
thatdbzguy wrote:I have a few shirts (wearing one right now, actually) and I've shown pics of my collection online before, but I try not to talk about it too much in real life. I don't want to get somebody started on why they hate DBZ. I get enough of that on the internet. [Context: When in thread called "How Open Are You About Your Fandom?"]
thatdbzguy wrote:I personally loved most of the new voice work, and am glad that they decided to be a bit more faithful to the manga. [Context: When in thread called "Were you satisfied by the English dub of Kai?"]
thatdbzguy wrote:I never agreed with this complaint. Each saga in DBZ felt fresh and inventive to me. I guess people only pay attention to the whole "bad guy shows up and gets defeated" thing, which is not all each saga has to offer.
thatdbzguy wrote:The fandom's general interpretation of Gohan's speech to Cell as "random pacifism". [Context: When in thread called "Biggest DB Disappointment"]
thatdbzguy wrote:I can't think of a single time where I didn't like any of my favorite characters, let alone one.

They may do stupid/dickish things at times, but they still retain their likability for me.
thatdbzguy wrote:Any complaint involving how the Dragon Balls were used/not used doesn't bother me, and that includes how often they bring back people from the dead. Apparently, I'm pretty much alone in not being bothered by this.

Complaints about Gohan's character in the Cell arc. I usually just don't agree with them. [Context: Common Complaints against the series that don't bother you?]
thatdbzguy wrote:1. Cell
2. Freeza
3. Saiyan
4. Buu

The Buu arc, while enjoyable, felt incredibly unnecessary to me. Not to mention that the writing was at its sloppiest here. [Context: Rank the 4 Major Z Arcs from Best to Worst]
thatdbzguy wrote:Out of the three more major characters of DBZ, which do you prefer the most?

My personal favorite is Goku. I love his overall attitude and personality.
thatdbzguy wrote:Am I the only one who actually liked Perfect Cell?


I liked how he was basically an evil version of Goku with the new goal of actually proving his perfection instead of going "K, reached Perfect Form. I'll leave you guys alone now."
thatdbzguy wrote:I'm curious, what's with the dislike for Gohan? I actually really like him, just not as much as Goku or Vegeta.
Yeah, I've dug through his past posts, and it looks like things didn't always used to be this way. I don't know what's happened, but, I think there's something more than just a trolling attempt, judging by these posts, and the fact that he's been on this website since around September-October of 2013...and I'd really like to know what's up. Kind of concerned actually.
Back when I made those posts, I was just a blind DBZ fanboy who refused to accept the bajillion amount of issues with the series presented here and on other websites.

It got to the point where I just couldn't fool myself anymore, and I came to accept how bad DBZ is.

Now, let's get back on topic instead of focusing on me.
Khalid Shahin wrote:
Dragon Soul Funimation Lyrics wrote:Nothing ever dies; we will rise again!
Yeah, pretty much sums the show up right there.

User avatar
JackyBoi99
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 316
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:59 am
Location: Qld Australia

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by JackyBoi99 » Fri Apr 11, 2014 6:56 am

If you think dragon ball z is so bad, then stop using kanzenshuu because it's so annoying see you complain about dragon ball z. Stop trying make everyone think that dragon ball z is so bad, just because you don't like it.
It is clear that sometime in Mark Satan's life, he acquired the dragon balls and called upon shenlong to grant him immortality.

98% of Kanzenshuu-goers have not kissed a girl. If you're one of the 2% that has, copy and paste this into your signature.
- Kid Buu

User avatar
Freeza Soldier #156
Regular
Posts: 611
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 6:41 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by Freeza Soldier #156 » Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:18 am

thatdbzguy wrote:Back when I made those posts, I was just a blind DBZ fanboy who refused to accept the bajillion amount of issues with the series presented here and on other websites.

It got to the point where I just couldn't fool myself anymore, and I came to accept how bad DBZ is.

Now, let's get back on topic instead of focusing on me.
From blind fanboy to blind sheep...fantastic. Way to step it up :roll: .

No arc in this series is just a blatant rehash of any previous arc. Arcs may follow a similar structure, but each one brings new ideas to the table that keep the story interesting. Akira Toriyama found a structure that proved to be successful with readers and based his story around that structure. This is what most fictional works do. If you want to fault DBZ for doing this, then you have to fault not only pretty much every other shonen manga/anime ever created, but also most other fiction book/film/TV series as well.

User avatar
Bullza
Banned
Posts: 8621
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 12:48 am
Location: UK

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by Bullza » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:04 pm

Another thread with the same whining OP.

What'll your next thread be? "Was Goku a terrible protaganist?"

User avatar
Fionordequester
I Live Here
Posts: 2879
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:33 pm

Re: Was the Freeza saga just a rehash of the Saiyan saga?

Post by Fionordequester » Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:08 am

Back when I made those posts, I was just a blind DBZ fanboy who refused to accept the bajillion amount of issues with the series presented here and on other websites.

It got to the point where I just couldn't fool myself anymore, and I came to accept how bad DBZ is.

Now, let's get back on topic instead of focusing on me.
And all that happened over the course of a few months huh? Well, in that case, I'd love to prove to you otherwise (since all these threads seem to be an attempt at getting someone to prove you wrong), but, honestly, I don't think you're specific enough in your complaints. So, what I'd like you to do is either go into more detail (maybe do a write up like what I'm doing for each episode of Dragon Ball in my thread), or link us to whatever websites convinced you that DBZ sucks. That's where you seem to be getting your opinions after all, so if we prove those wrong, we've also proved you wrong, right?

How about it DBZGuy? Seems to me like this'd be way more efficient than everything we've been doing so far.
Kataphrut wrote:It's a bit of a Boy Who Cried Wolf situation to me...Basically, the boy shouldn't have cried wolf when the wolves just wanted to Go See Yamcha. If not, they might have gotten some help when the wolves came back to Make the Donuts.
Chuquita wrote:I liken Gokû Black to "guy can't stand his job, so instead of quitting and finding a job he likes, he instead sets fire not only to his workplace so he doesn't have to work there, but tries setting fire to every store in the franchise of that company".

Post Reply