Seriously, just read a freaking page before posting these things. Everything you've been posting has been discussed many hours prior.kidtrunksssj wrote:New Interview With Producer Masayuki Hirano of Dragonball Xenoverse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYlglPi3XOM
literally on the same page too.budokaifanatic007 wrote:It was already posted......as usual.kidtrunksssj wrote:New Interview With Producer Masayuki Hirano of Dragonball Xenoverse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYlglPi3XOM
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.
That's not one of my favourites. The Final Bout Vegito, Freeza, Vegeta and Piccolo themes stick out as more memorable. I also really like this (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr_8jWjUv4U) Buu theme despite only the short version being in the game.Drev wrote:THIS ONE was the only good one of those games:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9VWgJTK1pE
Hikari no will power. I also hope that original japanese music will be included in the japanese version of this game as well (like raging blast 2, boz etc)
well it's hikari no willpower again, but yes ub22 version is better, i love that song (here the vocal original version):NitroEX wrote:That's not one of my favourites. The Final Bout Vegito, Freeza, Vegeta and Piccolo themes stick out as more memorable. I also really like this (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr_8jWjUv4U) Buu theme despite only the short version being in the game.Drev wrote:THIS ONE was the only good one of those games:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9VWgJTK1pE
Hikari no will power. I also hope that original japanese music will be included in the japanese version of this game as well (like raging blast 2, boz etc)
Ultimate Battle 22 has too many to list. I think the Trunks theme in that game (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-wtFsv7R2U) is better than the Final Bout one.
I'd say no, and that the case is that simply like other instances of Dragonball Z games, they have been incredibly lazy with custom character designs and just lifted generic features and clothing from other characters.Cold Skin wrote:Could it be that part of reaching the good era in his machine from the mystery city involves having an item that belonged specifically to an era or someone from that era?
So that the boy wears that mix of things to be able to access any Z era?
Cause it's hard to explain that mix otherwise (except of course with the classic theory of character creation allowing any fantasy and weird mixes).
Completely agreed. I've never wanted character creator and I don't see why people care about it so much. It's just a cheap gimmick that they relied on in UT instead of making the gameplay good. I mean who would chose to play as some cheap knockoff of Goku instead of Goku himself? All of the designs from UT were uninspired and I feel the same way about the characters in Dragonball Online too. They just have no place being in the game or story imo. I say just give us the regulars from Z, the best of the movie villains, the important GT characters and maybe a few from DB and call it a day. The only way I want to see original characters is if it's an original villain with their own saga who isn't a knockoff of the old villains in any way.Drev wrote:i honestly prefer they focus on Z and GT characters, instead of making a character creator...
there are many hints about that: name above the circle lock-on, the lock-on, enemy bar that appears only when locked, the fact that you can't see enemy ki but only life bar, the yellow and red arrow etc.SSuperVegito wrote:I honestly believe/think there will be at least 2v2 because of the circle thing around the enemy and the big space of the Stage (he also did not deny 2v2 in the interview).
yeah, first make a good gameplay and roster like old t3 times (doesn't mean the gameplay MUST be the same of t3, in fact this new one looks better), THEN (in sequels) you can put character creator, when everything else is already great90sDBZ wrote:Completely agreed. I've never wanted character creator and I don't see why people care about it so much. It's just a cheap gimmick that they relied on in UT instead of making the gameplay good. I mean who would chose to play as some cheap knockoff of Goku instead of Goku himself? All of the designs from UT were uninspired and I feel the same way about the characters in Dragonball Online too. They just have no place being in the game or story imo. I say just give us the regulars from Z, the best of the movie villains, the important GT characters and maybe a few from DB and call it a day. The only way I want to see original characters is if it's an original villain with their own saga who isn't a knockoff of the old villains in any way.Drev wrote:i honestly prefer they focus on Z and GT characters, instead of making a character creator...
I didn't really believe that could happen but hopes are raising a bit. That would definitely make me more excited about the game. I mean i'm mostly concerned about the game play mechanics and the pace but 2v2 would be a really fun addition to a game like this.SSuperVegito wrote:I honestly believe/think there will be at least 2v2 because of the circle thing around the enemy and the big space of the Stage (he also did not deny 2v2 in the interview).
And perhaps Dragon Ball, but not sure that Dragon Ball characters would suit this style although since it's been done by Dimps they'd find a way around it! I didn't really like when Spike tried it, though.Drev wrote:i honestly prefer they focus on Z and GT characters, instead of making a character creator...
t3 was a gt proper gamedbboxkaifan wrote:And perhaps Dragon Ball, but not sure that Dragon Ball characters would suit this style although since it's been done by Dimps they'd find a way around it! I didn't really like when Spike tried it, though.Drev wrote:i honestly prefer they focus on Z and GT characters, instead of making a character creator...
Dragon Ball GT has never got a proper game and the one that it had was just 'meh' (i.e, Dragon Ball GT: Transformation).
I think you're forgetting Final Bout although that was also pretty 'meh' aside from the music.dbboxkaifan wrote:And perhaps Dragon Ball, but not sure that Dragon Ball characters would suit this style although since it's been done by Dimps they'd find a way around it! I didn't really like when Spike tried it, though.Drev wrote:i honestly prefer they focus on Z and GT characters, instead of making a character creator...
Dragon Ball GT has never got a proper game and the one that it had was just 'meh' (i.e, Dragon Ball GT: Transformation).
You're probably right but I'd still like to see it included considering how many games have ignored it in recent years. We've had so many DBZ games in the past and mediocre ones in recent years that I just want to see them pull out all the stops for this one. I don't want a roster so big that it'll be at the expense of the gameplay but I'd at least like a B3/IW size roster. Back in the PS2 era I used to get hyped about them including new DB and GT characters. In recent years the focus has been almost exclusively on Z. I'd rather them make a great game the first time round than leave stuff out for sequels.Hellspawn28 wrote:I think GT characters are likely going to be save for a possible sequel or another game. I think it will be just DBZ for now.
90sDBZ wrote:Completely agreed. I've never wanted character creator and I don't see why people care about it so much. It's just a cheap gimmick that they relied on in UT instead of making the gameplay good.
90sDBZ wrote:Who would chose to play as some cheap knockoff of Goku instead of Goku himself?
Why? They arent actual characters but they are official Toriyama in-universe designs. They have a better place making a new story or adding creativity to the story instead of each year having to play the same old-tired one for the rest of our lives.90sDBZ wrote:All of the designs from UT were uninspired and I feel the same way about the characters in Dragonball Online too. They just have no place being in the game or story imo.
I'm getting really bored of the give and take system they have with these rosters. If character creator was in, I wouldn't care any less about it with that reassurance. I for one am tired of playing as the same characters for over 20 years and kept with the constant letdown of them not returning consistantly. The rosters in these games are so inconsistant, maining a character that isnt on the frontline fan favourites is often futile in every way because characters are constantly getting added then cut then added then cut again like a damn auction-off.90sDBZ wrote: I say just give us the regulars from Z, the best of the movie villains, the important GT characters and maybe a few from DB and call it a day. The only way I want to see original characters is if it's an original villain with their own saga who isn't a knockoff of the old villains in any way.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.
This looks great and that name "XENOVERSE" just sounds awesome. I'm excited. I'll be getting ps4 version.
Because this is the first game in a possible series, unlike Tag Vs, for example (and even Tag Vs worked better as a 1v1 game), and I don't think they should be focusing on something that may or may not work.Drev wrote:why can't it be a 1v1 that works also as 2v2, if u want to play 2v2 as well...
He didn't deny a portuguese brazilian dub for the game, either. And I'm pretty sure nobody's holding their breath over that.SSuperVegito wrote:I honestly believe/think there will be at least 2v2 because of the circle thing around the enemy and the big space of the Stage (he also did not deny 2v2 in the interview).
