And it didn't occur to you that they might be saying this because not every single DBZ fan in North America has even heard of the Dragon Boxes? (Not to mention that there's no way in hell FUNimation's old masters could look that good no matter what they did to them...)MajinVejitaXV wrote:...I meant if they were using the DragonBox masters, which were 'remastered' primarily by scanning the original cels and making a new master print altogether, then FUNi/their remastering firm wouldn't have to re-remove scratches and dirt that didn't exist on the new masters. Sorry if I wasn't clear.SaiyaJedi wrote:Actually, the Dragon Boxes did remove a ton of dirt and scratches from the masters, and corrected a lot of compositing errors by realigning them digitally. Just because they're still 10+ years old after the restoration, isn't the fault of the restoration process...MajinVejitaXV wrote:Time will prove me right or wrong, but here's my theory:
NO DragonBox masters were used here. The press release makes mention of removal of thousands of instances of dirt, scratches, etc...and I've seen no such things on the DragonBoxes. Why? Because they were already remastered themselves, and came directly from a new scan of the animation cels.
Seriously. If it looks like a Dragon Box, and quacks like a Dragon Box...



