Luso Saiyan wrote:
The character is one and the same, it was just interpreted differently.
Nah, for the character being one and the same he should have the same personality and history. Bardock from DBM and Bardock: Father of Goku have different personalities and history, hence why they are different characters.
Luso Saiyan wrote:A character doesn't need to be named or depicted in order to exist.
In-universe, yes. But this isn't an in-universe section. So yes, he need.
Luso Saiyan wrote:Since it was mentioned, it means the character that is Vegeta's brother does exist.
Exactly. Yet we still didn't see this character being portrayed by Toriyama.
Luso Saiyan wrote:Yes, it does. Denial is irrelevant against facts.
And here are facts:
Katsuyoshi Nakatsuru is one of Akira Toriyama’s highly-regarded “right-hand-men”, so to speak, responsible for a great deal of character designs during the TV series’ run, as well as commissioned to do an astonishing amount of official merchandise artwork (both in the past and present). In fact, there have been instances where Toriyama himself has not been sure whether a particular drawing was his or Nakatsuru’s!
Nakatsuru was initially given the task of designing Bardock and his crew for the upcoming TV special in the summer of 1990. His initial Bardock design remained relatively unchanged, but the designs and names for Bardock’s crew vastly differed from the final versions (click for larger version).
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/tidbits/the-h ... f-bardock/
Luso Saiyan wrote:Toei's original concept (based on Toriyama's vague description from the manga) was not used.
It was. It was "remained relatively unchanged", and it doesn't matter who changed what design and when, I am speaking about creating the character. Toriyama also created design of Broly, but would you go as far as to say that Toriyama
created Broly as a character?
Luso Saiyan wrote:The final design was provided by Toriyama. Since Toriyama's defined the final look of the character (having previously established a few details in the manga), he was as much a creator as Toei. .
No, he wasn't. You are focusing on a design, while not speaking about the personality which defines the character. As the facts go, both character design and personality of Bardock was created by Toei, not Toriyama. You may see how Toriyama depicts Bardock in Dragon Ball Minus, this one is Toriyama's Bardock, based on Toei's Bardock from Bardock: Father of Goku.
Luso Saiyan wrote:Hence co-creation. How the character was used and interpreted after that is a completely different matter.
Yes, co-creation in terms of design, yet the initial design was made by Toei, and the personality of Bardock as well as everything else featured in Bardock: Father of Goku was made by Toei. And "how the character was used and interpreted after that is a completely different matter" Exactly! What Toriyama does with Bardock later in manga is a completely different matter, but as we go now, Bardock from the special Bardock: The Father of Goku is Toei's creation with a bit of help from Toriyama with Bardock's and his crew's designs.
Luso Saiyan wrote:The point is, the character's creation was provided by both Toei (through Nakatsuru, who named the character and provided a few details that remain in the final design) and Toriyama (who provided the initial details in the manga and the character's final design).
Yes, but Nakatsuru didn't provide a few details, he created the character which we know as Bardock, he created his original design, which Toriyama left "relatively unchanged", and Toei did everything else with Bardock, by drawing him for Bardock: Father of Goku, animating him and defining his personality.
And as you said before, what Toriyama did in manga is a completely different matter.