ABED wrote:But we're dealing with two different scenes completely. Vegeta was dying at the hands of the man that killed his race in one, and in another, he's explaining his motives to the man he blames for why he did what he did. Freeza is nowhere to be found and had nothing to do with his decision to be controlled by Babidi. Strength was always important to Saiyans. It's in their blood, and there's little if any indication that Freeza held Vegeta in bondage. He seemed to favor Vegeta until his betrayal. Your explanation feels false to me. For one, giving someone a tragic backstory doesn't always equate to depth. Vegeta has always been an elitist, anything that flies in the face of that, irritates him. "I'm prince of a dead race, so I should be stronger! Me, me, me!!!" is how it manifests itself, but ultimately it's due to insecurity.
I'm not giving him a tragic backstory. He's already implied to have one. Whether or not Frieza tortured him isn't the point. He was held as a trophy and forced to serve Frieza. He had to hold himself back because he knew he was no match. This is shown in a filler scene, where he's with Raditz and Nappa. Here, he's also shown to be humiliated. People are naturally driven by their past and upbringing, and I like that playing a role in his actions and desires, rather than it just being some form of insecurity manifested due to his natural blood and instincts, which ultimately is the case, whether I like it or not. I don't want to spoil F, but that much is clear.
In the original or the dub?
I quoted Kai before:
Kai - "For Gohan, Chi Chi,
everyone on Earth, and the future of Namek, I am not about to give up! Less than 50% or not, if I pull off a kaioken x20, I at least stand a chance. I've just got to give it my all and show this guy that you do not mess with me and my friends!!"
If the subs I just watched of the Japanese version are correct, he says the following:
"For the future of Gohan, Chi Chi, Earth, and Planet Namek, I absolutely mustn't lose! 50% power, he says. Whether those words are a bluff, or whether they ain't... all I can do is stake everything on a 20x kaioken!"
Incidentally, the latter is closer to what I wrote. Again, he references more than just family and friends. He knows if he doesn't stop Frieza, he will continue harming innocent people besides just his friends. Maybe not what Toriyama had in mind, but Toei did.
It's not the same character and whether you prefer it isn't the issue, it's not Goku, and making Goku the guy who explicitly fights for innocent people isn't more heroic.
Hey, I didn't write that version of Goku. He's there. I like him, is all. It's like the different portrayals of comic book heroes by different writers. It's still Goku. He still loves to fight, has a goofy personality, and so on. Only he's depicted as even more selfless.
But we do know that he cares for others. I much prefer him to fight for his friends and family, it's way more concrete than a bunch of beings we don't know. Heroes aren't limited to those that make it their mission or job to help/save strangers. I'd rather he show his heroism through actions and not speeches.
I don't want him to show his heroism through non-stop speeches. I meant actions. He shows those actions in the movies, but his primary motive is shifted to protecting others, rather than JUST fighting someone strong and solely protecting his friends/family. I don't recall too many heroic speeches in the movies; they may be there. I forgot.