New Animation VS Old Animation

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by Doctor. » Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:58 pm

HybridSaiyan wrote:I was re-watching some of the Namek saga, and a thing that crossed my mind was this. Remember when Dragon Ball took such high measures in dealing with gore and heavy violence.

I miss all this. I miss how intimidating the villains were, it was unreal and gave you that sense of threat and fear.
And how is this gone?

Resurrection 'F' spoiler:

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5267
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by fadeddreams5 » Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:05 pm

Doctor. wrote:
HybridSaiyan wrote:I was re-watching some of the Namek saga, and a thing that crossed my mind was this. Remember when Dragon Ball took such high measures in dealing with gore and heavy violence.

I miss all this. I miss how intimidating the villains were, it was unreal and gave you that sense of threat and fear.
And how is this gone?

Resurrection 'F' spoiler:
Besides the censoring of that scene, it created no real impact. First of all, SSGSS Goku was pierced by a mook. Secondly, everyone just stood there like retards while Frieza did his thing. Third, Frieza simply was not a threat, so naturally, there was no sense of it or fear. Even if Goku was down, I doubt it's much of a surprise Vegeta gained a new power. Then, there's Beerus and Whis in the background. The scene did nothing. Frieza in F wasn't intimidating.

All those villains on Namek, including pre-F Frieza, were because they were genuinely a threat Gohan and Krillin could do nothing against. All they could do was watch as they slaughtered innocent people, including children.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by Doctor. » Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:08 pm

I think the complaint was about the gore and violence, which F has plenty of in that scene in particular.

If you want tension and a threat, you have BoG and the U6 arc.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by TheGmGoken » Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:16 pm

Doctor. wrote:I think the complaint was about the gore and violence, which F has plenty of in that scene in particular.

If you want tension and a threat, you have BoG and the U6 arc.
BoG had zero tension since we saw EOZ. U6 arc hasn't even aired yet... so is that really a good example?

Regarding new animation. I posted this on a different DBZ forum

User avatar
VintageSaiyan
Temporarily Banned
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 7:19 pm

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by VintageSaiyan » Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:24 pm

Doctor. wrote:
HybridSaiyan wrote:I was re-watching some of the Namek saga, and a thing that crossed my mind was this. Remember when Dragon Ball took such high measures in dealing with gore and heavy violence.

I miss all this. I miss how intimidating the villains were, it was unreal and gave you that sense of threat and fear.
And how is this gone?


Resurrection 'F' spoiler:
Tension has been missing from the series since this modern crap started. BoG was laughable and felt like more of a captain planet story than anything. RoF was another joke. They've taken the fangs out of dragonball to cater to the spongebob (whatever japanese equivalent that would be) audience.

User avatar
Baggie_Saiyan
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10315
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Location: Atlantis.

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by Baggie_Saiyan » Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:33 pm

They haven't taken the "Fangs" out of Dragonball at all. It is always been like this moreso the first half of the manga/original anime.

User avatar
VintageSaiyan
Temporarily Banned
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 7:19 pm

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by VintageSaiyan » Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:37 pm

Baggie_Saiyan wrote:They haven't taken the "Fangs" out of Dragonball at all. It is always been like this moreso the first half of the manga/original anime.
In dragonball sure, but not Z.

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by Doctor. » Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:45 pm

VintageSaiyan wrote:
Baggie_Saiyan wrote:They haven't taken the "Fangs" out of Dragonball at all. It is always been like this moreso the first half of the manga/original anime.
In dragonball sure, but not Z.
And this is Dragon Ball Super, what's your point?

User avatar
VintageSaiyan
Temporarily Banned
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 7:19 pm

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by VintageSaiyan » Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:49 pm

Doctor. wrote:
VintageSaiyan wrote:
Baggie_Saiyan wrote:They haven't taken the "Fangs" out of Dragonball at all. It is always been like this moreso the first half of the manga/original anime.
In dragonball sure, but not Z.
And this is Dragon Ball Super, what's your point?
That they've taken the fangs out of the franchise and it's taken a step back. At least when Z adopted a different tone, it widly reimagined Goku as an alien from another planet and introduced a plethora of different things that made it what it is. Super hasn't, instead it's rehashing old tropes and adding absolutely nothing of value.

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by Doctor. » Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:51 pm

VintageSaiyan wrote:That they've taken the fangs out of the franchise and it's taken a step back. At least when Z adopted a different tone, it widly reimagined Goku as an alien from another planet and introduced a plethora of different things that made it what it is. Super hasn't, instead it's rehashing old tropes and adding absolutely nothing of value.
How is going back to its roots a bad thing?

User avatar
JulieYBM
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 18557
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: 🏳️‍⚧️🍉

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by JulieYBM » Mon Aug 10, 2015 4:12 pm

A while back Shida Naotoshi tweeted this cool picture he took of some of his genga drawings. The one of Super Saiyan 3 Son Gokuu is from One Piece Episode #590.

Image
💙💜💖 She/Her 💙💜💖

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by TheGmGoken » Mon Aug 10, 2015 4:28 pm

Reimondo wrote:Image



DBZ had it's moments, when it looked crappy, we can't blame Super for being that bad most of the time.
Let's Compare Episode 1-5 of GT, DBZ , and DB to EP5 of Super.

Dragonball:
Image
Image

Dragonball Z:
Image
Image


DBGT:
Image
Image

Dragonball Super:
Image
Image



These are within the first 5 episode of each series.

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by Doctor. » Mon Aug 10, 2015 4:30 pm

And the only good shot out of all of those is this one. All 4 series have bad and good animation and art.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by TheGmGoken » Mon Aug 10, 2015 4:40 pm

Doctor. wrote:And the only good shot out of all of those is this one. All 4 series have bad and good animation and art.
I wasn't saying that the previous series had bad art or animation though. I was just posting a comparison. Jeez.

Besides I believe this shot is the best

User avatar
HybridSaiyan
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1113
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:18 pm
Location: UK

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by HybridSaiyan » Mon Aug 10, 2015 4:54 pm

Doctor. wrote:
HybridSaiyan wrote:I was re-watching some of the Namek saga, and a thing that crossed my mind was this. Remember when Dragon Ball took such high measures in dealing with gore and heavy violence.

I miss all this. I miss how intimidating the villains were, it was unreal and gave you that sense of threat and fear.
And how is this gone?

Resurrection 'F' spoiler:
That is hardly anything, trust me. DBZ had far more vile moments than that.
It's pretty bad how they're scaling it down a notch these days for younger audiences..

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5267
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by fadeddreams5 » Mon Aug 10, 2015 4:55 pm

Doctor. wrote:
VintageSaiyan wrote:That they've taken the fangs out of the franchise and it's taken a step back. At least when Z adopted a different tone, it widly reimagined Goku as an alien from another planet and introduced a plethora of different things that made it what it is. Super hasn't, instead it's rehashing old tropes and adding absolutely nothing of value.
How is going back to its roots a bad thing?
It's not even going back to its roots, really. That would imply it's going back to an emphasis on adventure.

Besides, Dragon Ball was darker and had much more "improper" humor. Super and the new movies are more like a pussified DBZ.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by Doctor. » Mon Aug 10, 2015 4:58 pm

fadeddreams5 wrote:That would imply it's going back to an emphasis on adventure.
Toriyama wrote:...and then, I’ve written a strange new story where they finally depart from this universe. They’re fighting against their neighbors, Universe 6! They’ll yell at me if I give away too many spoilers, so I’ll keep the rest a secret, but they’re chasing after giant Super Dragon Balls; I think things will unfold in a bright and simple way, that will be really fun and exciting!
fadeddreams5 wrote:Besides, Dragon Ball was darker and had much more "improper" humor. Super and the new movies are more like a pussified DBZ for kiddies.
Only the two DBZ specials were dark, the rest of the series was not.

And the original Dragon Ball only got 'serious' with the Daimao arc, an arc that ends up just as stupid as the F movie.

User avatar
h0kuten
Banned
Posts: 853
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:24 pm

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by h0kuten » Mon Aug 10, 2015 5:06 pm

The only problem with the Dragonball Super artwork is that it doesn't even look like Goku Lol. :lol: It looks like some random nobody drew it. The flow of the animation is extremely choppy as well.

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5267
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by fadeddreams5 » Mon Aug 10, 2015 5:06 pm

Doctor. wrote:
fadeddreams5 wrote:That would imply it's going back to an emphasis on adventure.
Toriyama wrote:...and then, I’ve written a strange new story where they finally depart from this universe. They’re fighting against their neighbors, Universe 6! They’ll yell at me if I give away too many spoilers, so I’ll keep the rest a secret, but they’re chasing after giant Super Dragon Balls; I think things will unfold in a bright and simple way, that will be really fun and exciting!
fadeddreams5 wrote:Besides, Dragon Ball was darker and had much more "improper" humor. Super and the new movies are more like a pussified DBZ for kiddies.
Only the two DBZ specials were dark, the rest of the series was not.

And the original Dragon Ball only got 'serious' with the Daimao arc, an arc that ends up just as stupid as the F movie.
We don't really know anything about that arc. I'm referring to what we've gotten so far from the new movies and Super.

I meant Dragon Ball was darker, not dark. I recall the RRA arc being the start of a shift in tone. Nothing too extreme.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: New Animation VS Old Animation

Post by Doctor. » Mon Aug 10, 2015 5:12 pm

fadeddreams5 wrote:We don't really know anything about that arc. I'm referring to what we've gotten so far from the new movies and Super.

I meant Dragon Ball was darker, not dark. I recall the RRA arc being the start of a shift in tone. Nothing too extreme.
We don't need to know much, they're leaving our universe, entering a different one and are chasing Dragon Balls. All of the arcs in the series where the main focus was to get all the DBs had a great focus on adventure.

And F is darker than most part 1 arcs. It has no tension, the villain is a joke and it's shit, but it still portrays itself as a dark and serious movie, which it is. What's your complaint here? It's not as dark as it used to be? Blame the Boo arc. It's not as good as it used to be? Blame the Boo arc.

Locked