Which game was a bigger improvement over its predecessor

Discussion of all things related to Dragon Ball video games (console and portable games, arcade versions, etc.) from the entire franchise's history.
Post Reply
User avatar
Akumaito Beam
Regular
Posts: 649
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 10:04 pm

Re: Which game was a bigger improvement over its predecessor

Post by Akumaito Beam » Sat Aug 15, 2015 2:01 am

The first Butoden game was such a broken pile of dicks, it's really surprising how much the sequels fixed without overhauling much of anything. The same sentiment applies double for the LOG series.
Top
Kakacarrottop
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:34 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Which game was a bigger improvement over its predecessor

Post by Kakacarrottop » Sat Aug 15, 2015 2:50 am

I preferred the music and story featured in the first LOG game, although i agree that the sequel was better in every other department. Ironically, that series started horribly, got good (with LOG II and Buu's Fury), and then ended horribly with the GT transformation game
"I will literally dress as Goku and walk around jumping up and down, pretending to fly, in public if this ever gets an official release"

- ShadowDude112 on Ocean's Kai dub
Top
User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Which game was a bigger improvement over its predecessor

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sat Aug 15, 2015 4:27 am

BT3 is clearly inferior to BT5.
Spoiler:
It's beyond comparison, realy.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.
Top
User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21433
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:
Contact Lord Beerus

Re: Which game was a bigger improvement over its predecessor

Post by Lord Beerus » Sat Aug 15, 2015 5:36 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:BT3 is clearly inferior to BT5.
Spoiler:
It's beyond comparison, realy.
Well played. :clap:
Spoiler:
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Video Games”