Canon or not? That is the(my) question.

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.
User avatar
Dayspring
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Post by Dayspring » Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:27 pm

Olivier Hague wrote:
Dayspring wrote:Future Trunks gets his sword in the 3-yrs after Future Gohan dies. Meanwhile movie 13 takes place when Trunks is like 7.
Just because you first see Trunks with that sword after Gohan's death, that doesn't necessarily mean he didn't have it before that...
Fair enough.
Olivier Hague wrote:
SaiyamanMS wrote:It doesn't matter what the Daizenshuu say about it being the same sword. It clearly isn't.
Well, it clearly shouldn't be. And yet, it's obviously meant to be the same sword.
It doesn't quite make sense, like many things in the movies...
Agreed. It's a simple plot hole, just like in movies 1, 5, and 9. I'm sure the creators simply didn't notice it, which is why GT is a sequel to movie 13, and the Garlic Jr saga is a sequel to movie 1.

As for the Toriyama interview, he did a one-shot (from which my avatar is taken) entitled "The Anime and Me," in which he advocates ALL Dragonball, be they TV, manga or movies, are canon. He may have been told to do so, however.
Captain Christopher Pike wrote:The away team will consist of myself, Cadet Kirk, Mr. Sulu, and Ensign Olsen.
Freeza Heika wrote: for the land of the cool, and the home of the Appule
The Geeky Gentleman: For all your comics, movies, TV and other geeky needs.

User avatar
Tyro
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 1648
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: USA

Post by Tyro » Wed Apr 25, 2007 4:16 pm

Dayspring wrote:
Tyro wrote:I only view the manga as canon. That means I don't count any and all filler material in the anime, the movies and Dragonball GT.
You should note that Toriyama loved the Bardock special so much that he added Bardock into the manga AFTERWARDS.
If anything I'd only count the ending of the movie canon. I normally just go by what was shown in the manga though. And that would be two panels.

User avatar
Dayspring
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Post by Dayspring » Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:26 pm

Tyro wrote:
Dayspring wrote:
Tyro wrote:I only view the manga as canon. That means I don't count any and all filler material in the anime, the movies and Dragonball GT.
You should note that Toriyama loved the Bardock special so much that he added Bardock into the manga AFTERWARDS.
If anything I'd only count the ending of the movie canon. I normally just go by what was shown in the manga though. And that would be two panels.
Meh. I consider it all canon. It doesn't contradict a single thing in the manga and Toriyama is the one who mentioned he loved it as much as he did, which is why he added those two panels. It would be a massive undertaking at the last second to translate the special into manga format. Probably boring too, since he wouldn't be doing anything original.

*Note: That's just my two cents, I'm not arguing against you or anything.
Captain Christopher Pike wrote:The away team will consist of myself, Cadet Kirk, Mr. Sulu, and Ensign Olsen.
Freeza Heika wrote: for the land of the cool, and the home of the Appule
The Geeky Gentleman: For all your comics, movies, TV and other geeky needs.

User avatar
desirecampbell
Moderator
Posts: 4296
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:55 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by desirecampbell » Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:17 pm

I don't like to use the term 'canon'. It works, but too many people have too many different definitions of 'canon'. Canon should simply refer to anything that doesn't specifically cause any contradictions with the story.

The problems arise when there are two events that contradict each other, and you have to decide which one is 'canon' and which one isn't.

For the sake of completionism, I'll quote this again:
1. Kanzenban manga - re-edited, and fixed - better than original - by Toriyama himself. For example, Enma's sign says "welcome", not "wellcome".

2. tankobon manga - original work, but contains errors and omissions corrected in the Kanzenban.

3. Author notes - anything written by Toriyama about the series that is not included directly in the manga. For example, his notes about Saiyan hair colour.

4. Original Japanese Anime, based on manga - DragonBall, DragonBall Z, Trunks special - disregarding filler. This includes instances that are derived directly from the manga, but are changed somehow (like the SSj hair colour, Goku's gi colour, when Pilaf shows up, and the friggin' week that was the Freeza fight) - but it doesn't include instances of filler that are entirely new (see below).

5. Original Japanese Anime not based on manga, produced by Toei for the series - DB/DBZ filler, DragonBall GT, Bardock special, GT Special. This includes any animation made for the series, but not based on any direct manga counterpart. Like the Garlic Jr saga, the driving episode, Yamcha, Tenshinhan, Piccolo, and Krillin helping out at the Cell games. These events are meant to have happened in the series, but sometimes contradict higher levels of canon.

6. Original Japanese DB/DBZ movies - produced by Toei, but not meant to 'fit' into the series' storyline. These can show the mechanics of the dragonworld in more detail, but actual events should necessarily be taken as having happened.

7. Official guidebooks, databooks, artbooks, and other official merchandise - these products are based off of the manga, the anime (including filler), and the movies so they cannot be taken as as high a level of canon as what they are derived from.

8. Original Video Animation for video games, game shows, fire safety videos, commercials, etc. - produced by Toei, but absolutely not supposed to represent the events of the story in any way.

9. Games (video, card, board, etc) - nothing taken from any game-based mechanics or story should be taken as literal to the story proper.

User avatar
Adamant
I Live Here
Posts: 3370
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 1:02 pm
Location: Viking Land

Post by Adamant » Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:23 pm

I'd put the Bardock special between 4 and 5, myself. "Original Japanese Anime not based on manga, produced by Toei for the series, but referenced to in the manga at a later date"

User avatar
desirecampbell
Moderator
Posts: 4296
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:55 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by desirecampbell » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:29 pm

Adamant wrote:I'd put the Bardock special between 4 and 5, myself. "Original Japanese Anime not based on manga, produced by Toei for the series, but referenced to in the manga at a later date"
The TV special is level 5, the two panels in the manga are level 1. Remember, these levels are only to be used to illiterate the varying weight of different events. Like the Trunks TV special: in it he goes SSj after Gohan is killed, in the manga he'd been a SSj for some time before that. Does that mean that everything in the Trunks special is 'not canon'? No, just the parts that contradict other things.

No product simply is or isn't canon (even the kanzenban contradicts itself). Each individual event must be examined. Whatever fits, fits. When one course of events must be chosen over another, that's when the list comes in.

Olivier Hague
I Live Here
Posts: 2171
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:09 pm

Post by Olivier Hague » Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:05 pm

desirecampbell wrote:Canon should simply refer to anything that doesn't specifically cause any contradictions with the story.
Well, it doesn't...
No product simply is or isn't canon (even the kanzenban contradicts itself). Each individual event must be examined. Whatever fits, fits. When one course of events must be chosen over another, that's when the list comes in.
If we're to follow your definition of "canon" and your list, yeah...

User avatar
desirecampbell
Moderator
Posts: 4296
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:55 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by desirecampbell » Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:09 pm

Well then, Oliver, what is canon, both in general, and specifically in regards to Dragon Ball?

Olivier Hague
I Live Here
Posts: 2171
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:09 pm

Post by Olivier Hague » Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:39 pm

desirecampbell wrote:Well then, Oliver, what is canon, both in general
The Wikipedia entry covers that one pretty well, in my opinion...
Anyway, it's not all about contradictions. Some works can be considered "non-canon" eventhough they don't directly contradict "canon" stuff (it could simply be because they weren't written by the original author, for example).

And about the kanzenban contradicting itself... That doesn't have much to do with the concept of "canon"... When people talk about "canon", they generally compare separate works... Saying that one panel of the original manga is canon and the next one isn't is taking things a bit too far, in my opinion. ^^;
and specifically in regards to Dragon Ball?
Well, canonicity is a subjective notion... And I can't think of many official comments about that... There's Toriyama's message about "Dragon Ball GT" being a "side story" (eventhough it would technically be a "sequel", if it were set in the same universe as the original manga), and I keep hearing things about the Daizenshû claiming that a couple of movies did "happen" (could someone provide the original quote? I'm intrigued)...

It's just that that you keep posting that list without reminding people that you're the one who compiled it in the first place... I, for one, disagree with it, as I told you a couple of times already.

User avatar
Dayspring
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Post by Dayspring » Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:25 pm

EDIT: Long post ahead. You've been warned.

Regarding canonicity (is that word? :P) both in the manga and anime: we're ignoring retcons and plotholes. It's the creation of plotholes that creates the difference in opinion regarding what is and isn't canon, since most retcons relating to both the manga and anime are "because I said so." Those kinds of retcons never go over well with fans, which is why we tend to ignore the retcons and decide for ourselves what is and isn't canon.

For instance, #19 and #20 show up first for no reason, #17 and #18 are stronger in Timeline 1 than in TL2, and #16 is present. Retcon: It's later eplained that Trunks' appearence in other timelines might cause there to be changes and that not all timelines are necessarily the same to begin with. That's the kind of retcon fans can easily accept. Meanwhile, plotholes like Movie 1 and the Raditz saga being ignored as a retcon will be cause for strife. The same goes with unnecessary retcons like the Kanzenban had. Though fans enjoyed seeing something new, it causes another rift.
Olivier Hague wrote:I keep hearing things about the Daizenshû claiming that a couple of movies did "happen" (could someone provide the original quote? I'm intrigued)...
Entries in the chronology of Daizenshuu 7 make reference to movies 1 and 5:


"761: Goku battles the forces of Garlic Jr, the kidnapper of his son Gohan." (The next entry is for October 12, 761 and talks about the Raditz saga.)

Under 763:
"One day in October: The planet Makyo approaches the Earth as it did 5000 years ago. Garlic Jr unleashes his revenge upon Gohan and his friends. (Obviously this is the Garlic Jr saga and not a movie)

First 2 entries for 764:
"One day in August: Goku's return to Earth. Trunks also arrives on Earth and defeats Freeza and his father."

"764-767: Cooler attacks the Earth. Goku confronts him."

The next entry for 764 talks about Vegeta training in a gravity room, Bulma falling in love with him, and Goku and Piccolo going to driving school. The next entry is for 766, stating that Trunks is born, and the next entry is about 767. It's first entry states that it is the year Goten is born in, then skips to numerous entries for May; May 7 being when Satan and Videl won the 24th budokai, and then May 12th-26th being the arrival of the Androids to the death of Goku. May 27 lists Goku's funeral and Trunks returning to the future. The last entry in 767 is about the Otherworld Tournament, taking place "one day between May and June." After that, it jumps to an entry for 770 in which Krillin and #18 get married. In other words, no entry for #9 being canon is made.


As for the movie 7 semi-canonicity claims that I and others make, note that the plothole regarding how the Trunks from Timeline 3 (the future timeline in which Cell originated from) was able to destroy the anroids of TL3 was solved by the daizenshuu. It explained that there are 4 timelines:

Timeline 1: The story we see, the anime and manga's timeline.

Timeline 2: The timeline that Future Trunks comes from.

Timeline 3: The timeline that Cell comes from. In 784 Trunks, like the Trunks from TL2, goes into the past. This Trunks goes into Timeline 4, where he obtains the remote detonator, which he uses to destroy androids of his timeline.

Timeline 4: The timeline that TL3 Trunks traveled to. For it's mini-chronology, it shows that it's identical to TL1 up to 767, where it shows that instead saying "Androids Appear. Cell Games debut," it just mentions the Cell Games. In the goes on to explain that the outcome of its Cell Games are unknown since Trunks was never present, as Trunks went back to his timeline and got killed.

That last bit creates a plothole, however, since Cell never arrived from any alternate timeline. Not only that, but how did he achieve perfect form if #17 and #18 were destroyed. This is why I and others say it should have been movie 7 instead. To explain the plotholes of movie 7, we can simply say that the Timeline differences could explain how the androids were defeated when they first appeared, as well as mention that Gero's computer perfected #13, #14, #15 instead of perfecting Cell. If a future Cell made no appearence in TL4, then Trunks and Krillin would have no reason to blow up Gero's sub-lab.


EDIT: Also, the bio for Trunks mentions that "We also learn from the anime that the sword used by Mirai Trunks was given to him by Tapion." There are no mentions regarding whether or not movie 13 is canon or how a Mirai Tapion could have existed.
Captain Christopher Pike wrote:The away team will consist of myself, Cadet Kirk, Mr. Sulu, and Ensign Olsen.
Freeza Heika wrote: for the land of the cool, and the home of the Appule
The Geeky Gentleman: For all your comics, movies, TV and other geeky needs.

Olivier Hague
I Live Here
Posts: 2171
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:09 pm

Post by Olivier Hague » Fri Apr 27, 2007 5:19 pm

Dayspring wrote:Regarding canonicity (is that word? :P) both in the manga and anime: we're ignoring retcons and plotholes. It's the creation of plotholes that creates the difference in opinion regarding what is and isn't canon
Well, again, it's not always the only criteria when deciding what's canon and what isn't...
The same goes with unnecessary retcons like the Kanzenban had.
Hmm... Like what? ^^;
There's the ending, but...?
Olivier Hague wrote:I keep hearing things about the Daizenshû claiming that a couple of movies did "happen" (could someone provide the original quote? I'm intrigued)...
Entries in the chronology of Daizenshuu 7 make reference to movies 1 and 5:
Oh, that? I thought there was a direct statement about that in one of the anime-related Daizenshû (I haven't read those, so I wouldn't know).
Yeah, that timeline also includes some filler stuff. The seventh Daizenshû covers both the manga and the anime, so... Yeah, I'm not really surprised.
Thanks for clearing that up for me.
The last entry in 767 is about the Otherworld Tournament, taking place "one day between May and June." After that, it jumps to an entry for 770 in which Krillin and #18 get married. In other words, no entry for #9 being canon is made.
Then again, the timeline isn't that exhaustive... I'm not sure we should assume that means a movie isn't canon because it's not mentioned (even when it could actually fit in the timeline!)... or that it is canon when it is mentioned (see above).

User avatar
Dayspring
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Post by Dayspring » Fri Apr 27, 2007 5:27 pm

Bleh. Movie 9 is not canon. The wrong Trunks is in it. XP

And you're not taking my comment about the Kanzenban in context. Simply because there was only one retcon in it doesn't mean people won't argue over which ending is canon.
Captain Christopher Pike wrote:The away team will consist of myself, Cadet Kirk, Mr. Sulu, and Ensign Olsen.
Freeza Heika wrote: for the land of the cool, and the home of the Appule
The Geeky Gentleman: For all your comics, movies, TV and other geeky needs.

Olivier Hague
I Live Here
Posts: 2171
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:09 pm

Post by Olivier Hague » Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:37 pm

Dayspring wrote:And you're not taking my comment about the Kanzenban in context. Simply because there was only one retcon in it doesn't mean people won't argue over which ending is canon.
It's just that I wasn't sure as to what you were referring to...
Yeah, I guess there will be probably be arguments over that, indeed. Heck, the Wikipedia entry actually adresses that kind of issue:
While many favor the principle of first mention, arguing that the information in the original television show or film is the foundation, following works have to respect, others claim that it is the latest work that is up-to-date and the one to be considered as canon (critics have pointed out that this attitude is an open invitation to dystopian revisionism as practised in Nineteen Eighty-Four).
(dystopian revisionism フォ~!!!)

User avatar
Dayspring
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Post by Dayspring » Fri Apr 27, 2007 7:04 pm

That Nineteen Eighty-Four example is so full of WIN. XD
Captain Christopher Pike wrote:The away team will consist of myself, Cadet Kirk, Mr. Sulu, and Ensign Olsen.
Freeza Heika wrote: for the land of the cool, and the home of the Appule
The Geeky Gentleman: For all your comics, movies, TV and other geeky needs.

User avatar
Tyro
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 1648
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: USA

Post by Tyro » Sat Apr 28, 2007 1:02 am

I have a few questions. Was Dragonball originally just a manga? If so, that'd make the manga the original canon story, right? Also, who made the filler segments in the anime? I've always believed it to be Toei productions, with just a ok by Akira Toriyama saying it was alright and he didn't really care. Plus he might have thrown in a few ideas, but they were never intended to actually go into the story, and were rather just ideas Mr. Toriyama thought would be cool.

User avatar
Conan the SSJ
I Live Here
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:40 am
Location: Ohio

Post by Conan the SSJ » Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:28 am

Dayspring wrote:Bleh. Movie 9 is not canon. The wrong Trunks is in it. XP
Hmm, because he grew his hair back out during his last trip to the past? Or because Goten gets no dialogue reference; despite the fact Ox King's absence is an obvious implying that he's looking after him? I think you're being way too picky with movie 9. IMO, it's pretty crucial in explaining why Goku doesn't teleport to stop Buu from killing his friends on the lookout before Gotenks escapes the ROSAT, because just like when he tryied to stop Bojack, he found he was still bound to the Other world with no life-energy and could only remain in the living world for a very short time (hence fading away instead of teleporting while telling Gohan to stop being childish against Bojack). Considering how pissed Goku looked and why he didn't just put his fingers on his forehead and transport to Earth, I just go with the idea he's thinking "It'd be futile, I'd last no longer in that world than the encounter with Bojack...!!"
Last edited by Conan the SSJ on Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
14 years later

User avatar
Magica
Regular
Posts: 615
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 12:29 pm
Location: WA

Post by Magica » Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:30 am

Dayspring wrote:Bleh. Movie 9 is not canon. The wrong Trunks is in it. XP
But even the wrong Trunks is the sexiest Trunks in the entire series. <3

User avatar
desirecampbell
Moderator
Posts: 4296
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:55 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by desirecampbell » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:02 pm

Tyro wrote:I have a few questions. Was Dragonball originally just a manga? If so, that'd make the manga the original canon story, right? Also, who made the filler segments in the anime? I've always believed it to be Toei productions, with just a ok by Akira Toriyama saying it was alright and he didn't really care. Plus he might have thrown in a few ideas, but they were never intended to actually go into the story, and were rather just ideas Mr. Toriyama thought would be cool.
The manga was being made, one chapter at a time, one week at a time starting in 1984. In 1986, the series began airing, one episode at a time, one week at a time. As the anime caught-up with the manga, Toei would add 'filler' into the episodes to pad out the length (Tenshinhan, Kuririn, Piccolo fighting Cell), make whole new episodes (Driving School), or even whole story arcs (Garlic Jr.). If the anime had used up all the available manga stories, then they'd have to either stop making the anime (and wait for enough material to be written) or create whole new story arcs to fill in (which is what happened with Naruto).

You can read more here.

User avatar
Dayspring
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7753
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Post by Dayspring » Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:46 pm

Conan the SSJ wrote:
Dayspring wrote:Bleh. Movie 9 is not canon. The wrong Trunks is in it. XP
Hmm, because he grew his hair back out during his last trip to the past? Or because Goten gets no dialogue reference; despite the fact Ox King's absence is an obvious implying that he's looking after him? I think you're being way too picky with movie 9. IMO, it's pretty crucial in explaining why Goku doesn't teleport to stop Buu from killing his friends on the lookout before Gotenks escapes the ROSAT, because just like when he tryied to stop Bojack, he found he was still bound to the Other world with no life-energy and could only remain in the living world for a very short time (hence fading away instead of teleporting while telling Gohan to stop being childish against Bojack). Considering how pissed Goku looked and why he didn't just put his fingers on his forehead and transport to Earth, I just go with the idea he's thinking "It'd be futile, I'd last no longer in that world than the encounter with Bojack...!!"
Er...no. ^_^;;

I say the wrong Trunks because the Trunks who DID go back in time was 2-3 years older than the one who appeared in movie 9. I still think they put the younger Trunks in for the reason Magica mentioned.

Speaking of Mirai Trunks: why didn't he kill Cell in the embryonic stage once he returned to his own timeline? :S
Captain Christopher Pike wrote:The away team will consist of myself, Cadet Kirk, Mr. Sulu, and Ensign Olsen.
Freeza Heika wrote: for the land of the cool, and the home of the Appule
The Geeky Gentleman: For all your comics, movies, TV and other geeky needs.

Olivier Hague
I Live Here
Posts: 2171
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:09 pm

Post by Olivier Hague » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:28 am

Dayspring wrote:I say the wrong Trunks because the Trunks who DID go back in time was 2-3 years older than the one who appeared in movie 9.
Can you really tell?

Post Reply