Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
thatdbzguy
Banned
Posts: 880
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:27 am

Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by thatdbzguy » Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:55 am

Saying DBZ has no character development has become a fairly common claim. Some accuse if of having characters that just "switch sides", with no actual development. Do you agree?
Khalid Shahin wrote:
Dragon Soul Funimation Lyrics wrote:Nothing ever dies; we will rise again!
Yeah, pretty much sums the show up right there.

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4353
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by Zephyr » Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:03 am

Though Tenshinhan, Piccolo, and Vegeta all fill the same general role of "asshole bad guy who turns into Goku's rival and later a very trusted ally", they all certainly have character development.

For someone to say otherwise is to demonstrate the fact that they've not actually read/watched the series.

User avatar
DBZ Mick
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 1:38 am
Location: Australia

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by DBZ Mick » Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:11 am

It depends on what you see as character development.

I see it like this- The audience must infer for themselves what the character is like through the character’s thoughts, actions, speech (choice of words, way of talking), looks and interaction with other characters, including other characters’ reactions to that particular person.

Dragonball certainly has that.

Or character arc- the change in characterization of a dynamic character, who changes over the course of a narrative.

Dragonball has that.


It might not be the richest but it certainly has character development.
It is in his character to be rude and a bit crass. He's a hick, with no formal education. That is Son Goku. That is who he is.

Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.

-DemonRin

User avatar
DoomieDoomie911
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 981
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 2:12 pm
Location: United States

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by DoomieDoomie911 » Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:53 am

I think there's plenty of character development in Dragon Ball. Just as Zephyr said above, Vegeta, Tenshinhan, and Piccolo all fit the are villians who turn into allies, but there is still lots of character development.
Cipher wrote:Dragon Ball is the story of a kind-hearted, excitable child who uses the power of friendship to improve those around him as he grows into a dangerous obsessive who sometimes accidentally saves the world.
She/her (I have a Twitter account now.)

User avatar
Cursed Lemon
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1407
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:29 pm
Location: Location, Location
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by Cursed Lemon » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:06 am

In DBZ specifically, the only characters who truly undergo character development are Piccolo in the Saiyan saga, Gohan up until the Cell games, and Vegeta throughout the series.
Special Beam Cannon!

(゚Д゚)σ 弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌⊃

User avatar
Gonstead
I Live Here
Posts: 3500
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:33 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by Gonstead » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:08 am

Cursed Lemon wrote:In DBZ specifically, the only characters who truly undergo character development are Piccolo in the Saiyan saga, Gohan up until the Cell games, and Vegeta throughout the series.
And Goku during the Frieza Saga.
Visit DragonBallFigures for all your Dragon Ball figure info and needs!
Mayuri Kurotsuchi wrote:"In this world, nothing perfect exists. It may be a cliche after all but it's the way things are. That's precisely why ordinary men pursue the concept of perfection, it's infatuation. But ultimately I have to ask myself "What is the true meaning of being perfect?" and the answer I came up with was nothing. Not one thing. The truth of the matter is I despise perfection! If something is truly perfect, that's IT! The bottom line becomes there is no room for imagination! No space for intelligence or ability or improvement! Do you understand? To men of science like us, perfection is a dead end, a condition of hopelessness. Always strive to be better than anything that came before you but not perfect! Scientist's agonize over the attempt to achieve perfection! That's the kind of creatures we are! We take joy in trying to exceed our grasp, in trying to reach for something that in the end, we have to admit may in fact be unreachable!"
MY HOLY GRAIL (110% Serious. Please sell me one)

User avatar
Cursed Lemon
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1407
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:29 pm
Location: Location, Location
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by Cursed Lemon » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:12 am

Gonstead wrote:And Goku during the Freeza Saga.
I don't really think Goku undergoes any character development. I mean, he changes demeanor with respect to the situation, but what about Goku's fundamental personality is ACTUALLY, permanently altered at any point in DBZ? He remains the same slightly naive, happy-go-lucky individual we expect.
Special Beam Cannon!

(゚Д゚)σ 弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌⊃

User avatar
Gonstead
I Live Here
Posts: 3500
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:33 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by Gonstead » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:17 am

Cursed Lemon wrote:
Gonstead wrote:And Goku during the Freeza Saga.
I don't really think Goku undergoes any character development. I mean, he changes demeanor with respect to the situation, but what about Goku's fundamental personality is ACTUALLY, permanently altered at any point in DBZ? He remains the same slightly naive, happy-go-lucky individual we expect.
He finally accepts who and what he is - A Saiyan, after so long of denying it.

Ever since Raditz, he's pretty much been barraged with "You're a Saiyan!". When he finally turned Super Saiyan, he understood.
Visit DragonBallFigures for all your Dragon Ball figure info and needs!
Mayuri Kurotsuchi wrote:"In this world, nothing perfect exists. It may be a cliche after all but it's the way things are. That's precisely why ordinary men pursue the concept of perfection, it's infatuation. But ultimately I have to ask myself "What is the true meaning of being perfect?" and the answer I came up with was nothing. Not one thing. The truth of the matter is I despise perfection! If something is truly perfect, that's IT! The bottom line becomes there is no room for imagination! No space for intelligence or ability or improvement! Do you understand? To men of science like us, perfection is a dead end, a condition of hopelessness. Always strive to be better than anything that came before you but not perfect! Scientist's agonize over the attempt to achieve perfection! That's the kind of creatures we are! We take joy in trying to exceed our grasp, in trying to reach for something that in the end, we have to admit may in fact be unreachable!"
MY HOLY GRAIL (110% Serious. Please sell me one)

User avatar
coola
I Live Here
Posts: 3458
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:33 am
Location: Poland

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by coola » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:24 am

In my opinion, Goku turned worse in DBZ, in DB, he would never allow bad guy to live, wanting to fight him again, so, instead of development, we have regress.
My Twitter: @kamil198811
Bulma fan
Thanks to Discotek:
Magic Knight Rayearth get DVD release in 2015 and Blu-Ray release on 2016
Saint Seiya: The Lost Canvas get DVD release in 2015

User avatar
Gonstead
I Live Here
Posts: 3500
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:33 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by Gonstead » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:31 am

coola wrote:In my opinion, Goku turned worse in DBZ, in DB, he would never allow bad guy to live, wanting to fight him again, so, instead of development, we have regress.
Simply, he learned from Kami that killing is wrong.
Visit DragonBallFigures for all your Dragon Ball figure info and needs!
Mayuri Kurotsuchi wrote:"In this world, nothing perfect exists. It may be a cliche after all but it's the way things are. That's precisely why ordinary men pursue the concept of perfection, it's infatuation. But ultimately I have to ask myself "What is the true meaning of being perfect?" and the answer I came up with was nothing. Not one thing. The truth of the matter is I despise perfection! If something is truly perfect, that's IT! The bottom line becomes there is no room for imagination! No space for intelligence or ability or improvement! Do you understand? To men of science like us, perfection is a dead end, a condition of hopelessness. Always strive to be better than anything that came before you but not perfect! Scientist's agonize over the attempt to achieve perfection! That's the kind of creatures we are! We take joy in trying to exceed our grasp, in trying to reach for something that in the end, we have to admit may in fact be unreachable!"
MY HOLY GRAIL (110% Serious. Please sell me one)

User avatar
TheMightyOzaru
Banned
Posts: 6255
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:50 pm
Location: Capsule Corp

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by TheMightyOzaru » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:32 am

Goku's really the only one who doesn't develop. Everyone of Goku's allies were all "bad" at one point and they became good later. They all just have varying degrees in the time it took for the turn to take place. Vegeta's was the longest.
Vegeta: "Funny... I seem to recall Kakarot being fed the same information right before he transformed; the distinct look on your faces when he went Super Saiyan didn't exactly inspire confidence. One does not predict or calculate power like ours."
Youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePrinceOfSaiyajins
My 3DS Friend Code:
2707-1669-7946

User avatar
SsjRavi
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Japan/England

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by SsjRavi » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:37 am

I think the whole aspect of Prince Vegeta and his pride helped develop his character a lot throughout Z.
Vegeta was an arrogant proud soldier whose actions were reflected by his powerlevel at that point in time and was due to his upbringing in as a warrior. Later in the series as he started to get use to human life he developed a soft spot for his family and other civillians.
"No. A sword is a weapon. Kenjutsu is the art of killing. Whatever pretty words you use to speak of it, this is its true nature. What Miss Kaoru says are the words of one who has never dirtied her hands. An idealistic joke. But, I like Miss Kaoru's idealism better than its true nature. If one can ask so much, I want the world to accept this joke as its true nature."
- Himura Kenshin

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:06 am

TheMightyOzaru wrote:Goku's really the only one who doesn't develop. Everyone of Goku's allies were all "bad" at one point and they became good later. They all just have varying degrees in the time it took for the turn to take place. Vegeta's was the longest.
Bulma, Chi-Chi, Kuririn, and Tenshinhan weren't "bad" (though three of them were morally flawed).
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

User avatar
TheMightyOzaru
Banned
Posts: 6255
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:50 pm
Location: Capsule Corp

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by TheMightyOzaru » Mon Sep 23, 2013 11:48 am

Bulma and Chi Chi are the exceptions. Tenshinhan WAS bad, and Krillin was morally in the wrong.
Vegeta: "Funny... I seem to recall Kakarot being fed the same information right before he transformed; the distinct look on your faces when he went Super Saiyan didn't exactly inspire confidence. One does not predict or calculate power like ours."
Youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePrinceOfSaiyajins
My 3DS Friend Code:
2707-1669-7946

User avatar
CaBrPi
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1158
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 11:15 pm
Location: D/FW, Texas

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by CaBrPi » Mon Sep 23, 2013 11:54 am

Bulma was quite often morally in the wrong. :P

She grew up quite a bit when she had a kid.

User avatar
Gyt Kaliba
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8869
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:38 am
Location: Arkansas
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by Gyt Kaliba » Mon Sep 23, 2013 1:28 pm

The way I've always looked at it is that Dragon Ball does have character development - it just doesn't really dwell on it long enough for us to really 'experience' it the same way we do in most other series.

For example, say...well, barring what would become of the character later, let's take Sasuke from Naruto. We see him becoming slightly less douchey towards Naruto during the initial couple of arcs, and you can really see the wall between the two start to come down (again, this is barring everything past that point that kinda throws this comparison completely out of whack). Now let's look at a similar situation with rivals forced to train together, Goku and Kuririn. We know Kuririn is a bit of an ass at first, and we see them training together - but we don't really get a lot in the way of them actually growing closer per say. It just kind of happens along the way, without anything directly showcasing that it's happening until it's over, it happened.

The weird thing? It manages to make 'just happening' really heartfelt in the scene where they're jumping into the air together after ditching the heavy turtle shells. It manages to be more sweet than anything between the other pair I mentioned, without giving it much focus. Somehow that's just the Toriyama magic I suppose though.
AniManga Travelogue - Currently Reviewing: Dragon Ball (Z)
Twitter
Switch Friend Code: SW-0745-6427-7791 (let's play some Dragon Ball: The Breakers!)

User avatar
Marco Polo
I Live Here
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:44 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by Marco Polo » Mon Sep 23, 2013 1:34 pm

Does Dragon Ball ahve character development?

Image

Yes.

matt0044
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1155
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:54 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by matt0044 » Mon Sep 23, 2013 1:50 pm

Gyt Kaliba wrote: The weird thing? It manages to make 'just happening' really heartfelt in the scene where they're jumping into the air together after ditching the heavy turtle shells. It manages to be more sweet than anything between the other pair I mentioned, without giving it much focus. Somehow that's just the Toriyama magic I suppose though.
I think it's because he doesn't spell it out there and it works because that's how it'd go in real life. You don't really need a focus storyline to hammer the point home.

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4353
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by Zephyr » Mon Sep 23, 2013 3:07 pm

DBZAOTA482 wrote:Bulma, Chi-Chi, Kuririn, and Tenshinhan weren't "bad" (though three of them were morally flawed).
Tenshinhan was an assassin in training with a history of extremely dirty fighting.

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Dragon Ball Z - No actual character development?

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Mon Sep 23, 2013 3:29 pm

We have character development for Goku, Gohan, Vegeta, Piccolo... I think that's it in DBZ.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

Post Reply