Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
I've heard on here that Cell wasn't originally going to be apart of the Androids saga and that he was added in later? I am not sure how true this is. But let's talk about it. How would the Androids saga be without Cell?
Personally I was invested so much in these Androids and all the hype that was built with Trunks. Then when Cell came into the picture out of left field I was like what? I loved the fight between Piccolo and 17 and wish Cell hadn't stepped in. And don''t get me wrong. I loved Cell becoming the perfect being of Gero's creations. And I think it was the right choice given the circumstances.
I think if they stuck with the Androids, and to make things more even, they would probably take out the hyperbolic time chamber. Because they would easily make chop liver out of 16,17,18 once Piccolo merged and the Saiyans did their training. I think if you had base super saiyans and a healthy Goku, it would have made for a nice 3 on 3 or 4 if you count Super Piccolo.
But again I think they went with the right choice. Despite some of the gripes with the Cell saga, like having millions of outs to prevent what happened happened with leading Cell to become perfect, it made for a much more interesting/branched out saga. I love 16, 17,18 but they weren't the most menacing characters, even in terms of power. If they had higher power levels or were their more menacing counterparts in Future Trunks timeline, I could see them being more than a threat. These androids only wanted to find Goku. They really didn't care on destroying cities or people. Heck they didn't even bother to fight the Z Warriors only if they got in their way.
I'm also glad that 17 and 18 wound up joining the Z Warriors later on. I honestly felt bad that they were abducted by Gero.
Personally I was invested so much in these Androids and all the hype that was built with Trunks. Then when Cell came into the picture out of left field I was like what? I loved the fight between Piccolo and 17 and wish Cell hadn't stepped in. And don''t get me wrong. I loved Cell becoming the perfect being of Gero's creations. And I think it was the right choice given the circumstances.
I think if they stuck with the Androids, and to make things more even, they would probably take out the hyperbolic time chamber. Because they would easily make chop liver out of 16,17,18 once Piccolo merged and the Saiyans did their training. I think if you had base super saiyans and a healthy Goku, it would have made for a nice 3 on 3 or 4 if you count Super Piccolo.
But again I think they went with the right choice. Despite some of the gripes with the Cell saga, like having millions of outs to prevent what happened happened with leading Cell to become perfect, it made for a much more interesting/branched out saga. I love 16, 17,18 but they weren't the most menacing characters, even in terms of power. If they had higher power levels or were their more menacing counterparts in Future Trunks timeline, I could see them being more than a threat. These androids only wanted to find Goku. They really didn't care on destroying cities or people. Heck they didn't even bother to fight the Z Warriors only if they got in their way.
I'm also glad that 17 and 18 wound up joining the Z Warriors later on. I honestly felt bad that they were abducted by Gero.
- miguelnuva1
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2822
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:23 pm
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
The saga probably would end the same way.
If 19 and 20 were the villians then they would need the grade forms to bear 19 and ss2 to beat 20.
The grade forms would handle 18 and maybe 17 but they would need ss2 to beat 17 or 16 if he was still around.
If 19 and 20 were the villians then they would need the grade forms to bear 19 and ss2 to beat 20.
The grade forms would handle 18 and maybe 17 but they would need ss2 to beat 17 or 16 if he was still around.
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
I was thinking the same thing. 16 would probably take a SS2 to beat. He wouldn't be the kind guy we got. But I guess the android version of Cell if that makes sense. I guess it comes down to who was the most compelling character out of all of them in terms of excitement and character and it's Cell.miguelnuva1 wrote: Mon Jul 05, 2021 1:05 am The saga probably would end the same way.
If 19 and 20 were the villians then they would need the grade forms to bear 19 and ss2 to beat 20.
The grade forms would handle 18 and maybe 17 but they would need ss2 to beat 17 or 16 if he was still around.
-
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2015 10:12 pm
- Location: The Planes of Lexington
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
What would've made the arc interesting was a reliance on time travel when it turned out that additionally-stronger Androids existed and had then completely overwhelmed the Z Senshi again and again. Trunks could've been stuck trying to relay further information of an even greater threat incoming, leading to the introduction of each new Android and thus, Trunks would've made the realization that he was only making the problem worse with his constant time travel. The arc's end might have been a twist in which we discover that Future Bulma inventing the time machine is what led to the creation of the Androids in the first place: by vowing to destroy it after helping the past Z Senshi finally succeed, Trunks would return and wake up in a world where there were no Androids as a shout-out to Back To The Future. The past Z Senshi would also be adequately powered up by the frequent trips made by Trunks and be ready for the challenge of the next arc.
"Why is a raven like a writing desk?" - The Mad Hatter 

Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
After seeing 17 fight in the tournament of power .....No.
It honestly could have surpassed Cell and gave us better fights.
It honestly could have surpassed Cell and gave us better fights.
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
I agree that Toriyama would have needed to drastically rewrite the personalities of the characters, their conflict with the Z-Warriors, the escalating tension, and even the competency of said villains. My concern is that does it become a rehash of the Saiyan arc with one android/cyborg proving to be the sadistic and overwhelming of the two while the latter is somehow eventually disposed of? Once that battle started there wasn't really an intermission or narrative gap to help rationalise any new elements that could have afforded the heroes what they needed to overcome their opponent sans the two hour reprieve Vegeta allowed for humour's sake.
The Cell arc as we have it allowed for some unexpected twists and turns with some of them admittedly being contrived. An arc with the original blueprint of two beings spawned by a previously unseen menace in Goku's past sounds like it has too many parallels to the Saiyan arc, if you ask me. To be fair, you could say the same with the Future Trunks and Cell arcs in that revolve around two genocidal beings creating a bleak future that Trunks needs to return to the past in order to find a means for somehow rectifying.
The Cell arc as we have it allowed for some unexpected twists and turns with some of them admittedly being contrived. An arc with the original blueprint of two beings spawned by a previously unseen menace in Goku's past sounds like it has too many parallels to the Saiyan arc, if you ask me. To be fair, you could say the same with the Future Trunks and Cell arcs in that revolve around two genocidal beings creating a bleak future that Trunks needs to return to the past in order to find a means for somehow rectifying.
- DBZAOTA482
- Banned
- Posts: 6995
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
As it was going the way it did, there wouldn't be a proper villain. 19 and Dr. Gero were pretty boring outside their absorption capabilities. 16, 17, and 18 also weren't really villains just a bunch of rascals.
fadeddreams5 wrote:Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.
I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.
- LoganForkHands73
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:54 pm
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
I would hope that Toriyama would've found other ways to make the story twisty and exciting without his editors' input to make new enemies. It seems he really wanted to push the "urban sci-fi thriller" angle. I really like #19 and #20, and the whole section of the Z-Warriors tracking them down through the city was some great stuff. As much as I like Cell, #16, #17 and #18, seeing some alternate reality where Toriyama's original vision for the Android arc played out exactly as he wanted would be interesting. Or maybe I can settle for a spin-off "director's rough cut" miniseries, similar to how Dark Horse adapted one of George Lucas's dusty old rough screenplays for Star Wars into a full comic series. As others have suggested, I believe that time travel would've played a role in making #19 and #20 more of a threat, thereby integrating Trunks more. The plot may have called for the carnival rejects to get replaced eventually but their role was meant to be larger than what we saw.
Either way, I'm a fan of most parts of the arc even if it doesn't all come together. Only the Cell Games portion doesn't really do it for me.
Either way, I'm a fan of most parts of the arc even if it doesn't all come together. Only the Cell Games portion doesn't really do it for me.
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
I felt like the History of Trunks was Toriyama's vision for the Androids without Cell. Or at least part of it.LoganForkHands73 wrote: Mon Jul 12, 2021 12:04 pm I would hope that Toriyama would've found other ways to make the story twisty and exciting without his editors' input to make new enemies. It seems he really wanted to push the "urban sci-fi thriller" angle. I really like #19 and #20, and the whole section of the Z-Warriors tracking them down through the city was some great stuff. As much as I like Cell, #16, #17 and #18, seeing some alternate reality where Toriyama's original vision for the Android arc played out exactly as he wanted would be interesting. Or maybe I can settle for a spin-off "director's rough cut" miniseries, similar to how Dark Horse adapted one of George Lucas's dusty old rough screenplays for Star Wars into a full comic series. As others have suggested, I believe that time travel would've played a role in making #19 and #20 more of a threat, thereby integrating Trunks more. The plot may have called for the carnival rejects to get replaced eventually but their role was meant to be larger than what we saw.
Either way, I'm a fan of most parts of the arc even if it doesn't all come together. Only the Cell Games portion doesn't really do it for me.
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
Definitely. The Cell Saga is fantastic, but sadly most of it was due to Toriyama's editor. LOL.
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
I would've taken the Geezer and the Fatso. They were actually quite intimidating for a while. I wonder how that would have unfolded and what other twists and turns Toriyama-san would have added.
Big fan of the characters of Dragon Ball, all of them, especially formerly prominent sub-characters. -__-
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
Gero should have remained alive as a mastermind of sorts, manipulating the conflicts so he could have his vengeance on Goku.
The Cell saga, to me, is one of the worst in all of DB, mainly because it focused entirely on ass pulls both from the characters and from the story itself - 17, 18, 16 and Cell literally came out of nowhere and with little build-up to them and even less development. In the end, Cell himself was little more than a brick wall for the heroes to overcome.
Gero as the conductor of all this conflict would work well, with 17 and 18 acting as the rebellious antagonists who could join the heroes, 19 his personal attack dog, and even Cell as his secret weapon (or even secret benefactor from the future, if you want him to eventually become the Big Bad). You can even throw the other androids (13, 14, 15 and Super 13) as a miniboss squad.
The arc does have a lot of potential with it's characters, their motivations and possible contributions to the story, but imo it was wasted because Toriyama wasn't known to plan his stories at all.
The Cell saga, to me, is one of the worst in all of DB, mainly because it focused entirely on ass pulls both from the characters and from the story itself - 17, 18, 16 and Cell literally came out of nowhere and with little build-up to them and even less development. In the end, Cell himself was little more than a brick wall for the heroes to overcome.
Gero as the conductor of all this conflict would work well, with 17 and 18 acting as the rebellious antagonists who could join the heroes, 19 his personal attack dog, and even Cell as his secret weapon (or even secret benefactor from the future, if you want him to eventually become the Big Bad). You can even throw the other androids (13, 14, 15 and Super 13) as a miniboss squad.
The arc does have a lot of potential with it's characters, their motivations and possible contributions to the story, but imo it was wasted because Toriyama wasn't known to plan his stories at all.
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
Over time I've come to view Cell as a boring character. He works as an obstacle for the heroes to overcome and looks cool (his 2nd form excluded), but as a character I find him pretty bland (and I think it's because he was more a product of Toriyama's editors than an organic Toriyama creation). So perhaps without him we would have gotten a central villain with a more interesting personality (or perhaps a version of Cell with a more interesting personality).
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
Form 1 is my favorite, since he's a horror movie monster slinking around in the shadows. The anime depiction of him was spot on. Outside of the look, Perfect Cell is growing on me. It's funny how fast that perfect/honorable combatant facade of his is cracked when he faces adversity. He's really the same sniveling/bratty character as form 2 (the one I really hate lol)Majin Buu wrote: Thu Jul 22, 2021 10:21 am Over time I've come to view Cell as a boring character. He works as an obstacle for the heroes to overcome and looks cool (his 2nd form excluded), but as a character I find him pretty bland (and I think it's because he was more a product of Toriyama's editors than an organic Toriyama creation). So perhaps without him we would have gotten a central villain with a more interesting personality (or perhaps a version of Cell with a more interesting personality).
Big fan of the characters of Dragon Ball, all of them, especially formerly prominent sub-characters. -__-
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
Perfect Cell was just the epitome of Freeza/Saiyans/Piccolo/Androids combined into one, so he was like the "ultimate villain" at that point in time having cells of every major character at that point in the series.
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
Okay, so out of story, we know how Toriyama's current and former editors made the arc what it is, but imagine reading or watching this arc for the first time. There's a level of tension and fear of the unknown that grips you as the arc more or less becomes a battle royale as the boogeyman waits for his time to make a final strike.
You take away Cell you lose all of that. Would it be boring? No. But would it be more interesting than the previous or next arc? No
You take away Cell you lose all of that. Would it be boring? No. But would it be more interesting than the previous or next arc? No
- miguelnuva1
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2822
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:23 pm
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
The arc would have been slightly more interesting had it been
Cell and Gero vs Vegeta and Trunks
Then Cell and Gero vs Goku and Gohan.
Cell and Gero vs Vegeta and Trunks
Then Cell and Gero vs Goku and Gohan.
- PurestEvil
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1951
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2020 2:34 pm
- Location: Constantinopolee!
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
God knows what Toriyama would have done with 17 and 18 had they been the final bosses, but I prefer Cell as a villain than the twins as they are, so I guess I would not have been as invested.
This post was brought to you by 魔族
Rest in Peace, Toriyama-san
Rest in Peace, Toriyama-san
-
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 6:11 pm
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
This.miguelnuva1 wrote: Thu Jul 22, 2021 8:30 pm The arc would have been slightly more interesting had it been
Cell and Gero vs Vegeta and Trunks
Then Cell and Gero vs Goku and Gohan.
I love the twins, so I definitely want them to still be created and involved.
But I feel like Dr.Gero is underrated, and could be an awesome main villain in his own right. Him not dying and a team up with Cell, him dying and somehow becoming a murderous A.I that controls multiple Androids, etc. Possibilities are endless.
- DBZAOTA482
- Banned
- Posts: 6995
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Would the Androids saga without Cell been boring?
Cell would probably end up killing Gero.miguelnuva1 wrote: Thu Jul 22, 2021 8:30 pm The arc would have been slightly more interesting had it been
Cell and Gero vs Vegeta and Trunks
Then Cell and Gero vs Goku and Gohan.
fadeddreams5 wrote:Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.
I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.