How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
Lord Frieza
I Live Here
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:36 pm

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by Lord Frieza » Tue Apr 04, 2017 2:15 pm

Gochu wrote:I expected opinions on super to be similar to mine for long time fans, but I'm seeing that many see Super as comparable to DB/DBZ, and most say it's better than GT.

I took a break from it last year after starting the champa saga, but over the past few days I've watched up until the end of future trunks arc.

Here are some of my thoughts/opinions on what I dislike about Super overall:

Comedy: Many say that super tries to be funnier like dragonball, except it goes about it in the wrong way imo. Dragonball accentuated the humorous traits in characters to make it funnier. For example, Roshi was much more perverted in DB compared to DBZ. And goku was more naive and often did funny things because he didn't know any better. But they kept everything believable for the characters. You would never see someone serious like Tien or King piccolo do something that was really out of character in order to be funny. In contrast, DBS does this all the time. We have piccolo acting as a babysitter/martha stewart, vegeta wimpering and cowering in subservience during the first appearance of Beerus, Goku acting unbelievably stupid even for him, etc. Also, many of the jokes are remedial and sort of damage the reputation of certain characters. For example, calling upon the divine dragon by saying "lemon pleasy" at the end of the summoning speech, as well as the king of all saiyans being asked to get a fluffy pillow for Freeza. This stuff happens all of the time in Super.

Animation: The animation quality is still just absolutely terrible. There isn't much to be said here because it obvious. It's just sad that the animation from 30 years ago was much better. Some things that really bug me, though, are how they don't even put in effort to maintain consistency. For example, Krillin's height fluctuates a 1-2 feet given the episode or scene he's in. Sometimes his eye level is at 18's crotch (meaning he'd be about 3'6") and others he's a bit taller. In some scenes where he sits in a chair, his feet don't extend past the seat, which would mean he is about the size of a 4 year old. This happens with other characters too, such as Supreme Kai.

The other thing is the character design. There just isn't much creativity or effort going on anymore. The champa tournament roster consisted of characters that any of us at 10 years old could have drawn on a whim. Such as generic childish robot man, mean winnie the pooh, and weird looking vegeta jr guy. It was also sad that after all these years we now know the strongest guy in the entire reality -- the god of everything -- is little more than a football turned sideways with a smiley face on it.

Power Level Problems: The powerlevel problems are worse than ever this time around. Characters like Master Roshi taking on Raditz-level Frieza minions and characters base forms being overpowered, etc. If you haven't seen the trunks arc yet then ignore this next part: spoilers: [spoiler]For example, Trunks manages to keep up with Goku black in SSJ2 form despite Goku and Vegeta at SSJG having tons of trouble. No matter how much strength Trunks has, it's just simply impossible for him to match black goku in SSJ2 (absent maybe something like Tiens special move against Imperfect Cell). We all saw the difference between SSJ3 Goku and Beerus, then the improvement when Goku went SSJG against Beerus. The point is, the difference between SSJ2 - Black is too enormous.[/spoiler] They really should just alter the story and circumstances to make it believable, instead it's like they choose what they want to happen, and with what characters first, and then force them to fit into that role even if it doesn't make any sense.

Another thing is techniques being used without sticking to any of the rules. Again, spoilers in the trunks saga: [spoiler]We're supposed to believe that the evil containment wave created by master roshi's master (power level <200) will be able to contain not only a super powerful being, but a god? And then trunks learns it perfectly in 3-4 minutes while Bulma distracts Zamasu, when it just took goku assumably much, much longer with master roshi watching and commenting along the way? Furthermore, that the containment wave is supposed to kill the user after it works, which was overlooked here. And even if dying is from significant ki drain, surely the difference between SSJ2 and a god would warrant enough of a ki drain for death? Also, trunk's spirit sword not only came out of nowhere, but it gathered energy way too fast. It also wouldn't have even had enough energy given that the entire planet was pretty much devoid of life.[/spoiler]

Lackluster Battles: The battles don't really pump you up anymore. Considering how powerful the character now are, having battles comparable to DBZ only makes sense. Instead, everything feels rushed and underwhelming; very 1-dimensional. The ki blasts all kind of look the same; large beam or scatter shot. There's very little use of planning, charging, or manipulating the beam to get an edge on the enemy like in DBZ. The punches and kicks are underwhelming, mostly. A lot of the movements and animation on the battles are poor. There was a scene in particular where trunks was fighting Deborah in a flash back that really got to me; he literally did a slow left slash, right slash, and 360 degree spin that looked like something from the puppet show interpretation of the Cell games we got of how hercule beat cell in DBZ. Also, transformations are underwhelming now, often rushed and don't really have that powerful feel to them anymore.

These next points might be more subjective, but some other things that bug me are the lack of creativity for transformations. Like just adding blue hair or red hair (super saiyan rose, terrible name). Also, the fact that all the characters are significantly smaller now; I really liked how muscular the characters looked in DBZ. Furthermore, the women are all flat and boyish looking, and bulmas mother went from seemingly never ending busty milf to generic depends underwear commercial grandma. Growing up with roided looking monkey men and fertile female characters in a cartoon is healthy for young boys, imo.

Anyway, IMO the show doesn't really do anything at all right. When one thing gets a little better something else gets a little worse. The only way this show makes sense to me is to see it as a spin-off of DBZ or a parody, almost like a really good fan-made attempt that can't figure out what it's really going for. Someone mentioned to me once that his theory is that Toriyama is just trolling all of us at this point, and to me, it certainly seems like it.

Besides the fact that this is Dragonball (so we instantly like it to some extent), and comparing it to DB, DBZ, and even GT based on what those shows did well for the series, what is there to like about this show? And how can anyone with a straight face, in any way, compare it to the previous shows?
I compare Super to DB/Z, here's my straight face....
Image
....and you can deal with it, its my opinion and I don't need to justify it to you or anyone else.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by sintzu » Tue Apr 04, 2017 2:28 pm

Lord Frieza wrote:I compare Super to DB/Z and you can deal with it, its my opinion and I don't need to justify it to you or anyone else.
That's because you can't. You can't justify the writing, the production, the rehashed character designs, etc.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
VegettoEX
Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
Posts: 17737
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by VegettoEX » Tue Apr 04, 2017 2:29 pm

I don't need to justify it, because I'm not on the creative team and I have absolutely no horse in the race over whether it's successful or not. No skin off my back.

I can, however, have a great conversation about certain aspects I like, those I dislike, what I think is working and what's not.

If you're not willing to have that conversation, I suggest you find another place to rant!
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::

cheddarsword
Regular
Posts: 746
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:59 am

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by cheddarsword » Tue Apr 04, 2017 2:37 pm

sintzu wrote:
Kanassa wrote:For Vegeta, we only see the outcome. He changes, yes, but that's all. For Buu we see the process of his change, we see how he was affect by Mr Satan, making it all the more triumphant when he swears to stop killing. When Vegeta charges Cell for killing Trunks, all I'm thinking is "Why the fuck do you care?!".

We don't see him slowly change, we never witness him changing. All the interesting part of good development happen off screen for Vegeta.
You need to re-watch Kai or re-read the manga again.
cheddarsword wrote:I honestly feel like the character development is quite good and rather accurate. as in, it makes sense.

I do rather enjoy the new fights. they're more intense than the old DBZ.
This is a great example of how this fan base's quality standards have dropped since Super started.

heh, i knew i had an unpopular opinion. or at least, i knew i'd be bashed for it.

i like what i like, and i can't help it if you disagree with that.

if you wish to criticize the new for not being the same as the old, then i feel sorry for you for not being able to enjoy the continuation of one of the greatest anime series of all time.

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Tue Apr 04, 2017 2:41 pm

Kanassa wrote:
sintzu wrote:Dissing what the original did is the only way to justify what Super does.
Not really, I'm not dissing the original for Super's sake, I'm dissing the original because I keep hearing about Vegeta's development and can only scratch my head at it. Look to Buu, he's the one with great development worthy of example!

Super's character development is only decent. I enjoy the stages the character's are at (Especially Vegeta), but what's within that development didn't really occur in Super. I enjoy the development of Beerus, Hit and Zamasu, but they're nothing great. They're just decent.
Kanassa wrote:For Vegeta, we only see the outcome. He changes, yes, but that's all. For Buu we see the process of his change, we see how he was affect by Mr Satan, making it all the more triumphant when he swears to stop killing. When Vegeta charges Cell for killing Trunks, all I'm thinking is "Why the fuck do you care?!".

We don't see him slowly change, we never witness him changing. All the interesting part of good development happen off screen for Vegeta.
All it took to stop Mr. Boo from killing was Mr. Satan telling him it's wrong to kill innocent people and we only saw him "cute" stuff with Mr. Satan. Nothing terribly impressive.

We see Vegeta suffer and learn humility time and time. First is when he poured his out to Goku about the fate of their people and homeland then growing to accept he has people to care for despite trying to push such sentiments away (we know Toriyama wouldn't show the romantic shit) and having closure to his rivalry with Goku.
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by TheMikado » Tue Apr 04, 2017 2:41 pm

VegettoEX wrote:I don't need to justify it, because I'm not on the creative team and I have absolutely no horse in the race over whether it's successful or not. No skin off my back.

I can, however, have a great conversation about certain aspects I like, those I dislike, what I think is working and what's not.

If you're not willing to have that conversation, I suggest you find another place to rant!
To be fair I think this thread and the conversation around it has arisen from conversations that go like this:

"I don't like the way Goku acts in Super."
"Goku has always been like that even in Z"

"I don't like the power inconsistencies in Super."
"Power inconsistencies have always been like that even in Z"

"I don't like the animation in Super."
"The animation has always been like that even in Z."

Even single critism of Super devolves into a "Well it was always like that. So instead of being about have a conversation on ways people would prefer to see Goku act or what specifically they don't like, we have debates on what Z was like. It's counter productive. Imagine is every review about a new model car or a new phone started with saying "well the older model was bad in these aspects so we shouldn't expect the new models to be much better." Right now, it's simply impossible to have the conversation and mostly due to the fact that it is billed as a direct successor to the the DBZ anime. Maybe in a few years, after everything has cooled down we can finally have discussions and reviews based on Super's merits alone.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by sintzu » Tue Apr 04, 2017 2:49 pm

cheddarsword wrote:if you wish to criticize the new for not being the same as the old...
I'm criticizing it for not being better.

There's no excuse for Super to have all the problems it has.

I enjoy Super but I'm not going to lie to myself and say it has no problems because it's DB or it's better than the original just because it's a sequel and new.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
The gr
I Live Here
Posts: 2856
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:58 pm

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by The gr » Tue Apr 04, 2017 3:25 pm

Kanassa wrote:
julianix wrote:Goku black and Zamasu where a solid addition.. But outside of that there's absolutely nothing super does better than dbz. The story, character development,
The character development was nothing to write home about in Z, aside from Buu and maybe Piccolo, it was rather poor.
Wow so your going to ignore mr Satan, krillin and Vegeta.Those development are arguably the best in the franchise
Mostly active on discord.

cheddarsword
Regular
Posts: 746
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:59 am

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by cheddarsword » Tue Apr 04, 2017 4:12 pm

sintzu wrote:
cheddarsword wrote:if you wish to criticize the new for not being the same as the old...
I'm criticizing it for not being better.

There's no excuse for Super to have all the problems it has.

I enjoy Super but I'm not going to lie to myself and say it has no problems because it's DB or it's better than the original just because it's a sequel and new.
i'll admit nothing's perfect, but overlooking a few smaller problems allows you to enjoy something you might otherwise not.

and i'll admit that super has some problems. but i still enjoy it. and i know that getting toriyama to change his mind about things is so close to impossible that it may as well BE impossible.

besides, after stating the reasons for his return to dragonball... i don't think he cares to much for outside input. at least, not right now.

User avatar
ahill1
Regular
Posts: 731
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 7:00 pm

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by ahill1 » Tue Apr 04, 2017 5:12 pm

VegettoEX wrote:I don't need to justify it, because I'm not on the creative team and I have absolutely no horse in the race over whether it's successful or not. No skin off my back.

I can, however, have a great conversation about certain aspects I like, those I dislike, what I think is working and what's not.

If you're not willing to have that conversation, I suggest you find another place to rant!
What you like and what you dislike about Dragon Ball Super?

User avatar
VegettoEX
Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
Posts: 17737
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by VegettoEX » Tue Apr 04, 2017 5:52 pm

ahill1 wrote:What you like and what you dislike about Dragon Ball Super?
Just gonna quote from Twitter yesterday regarding my dislikes:

First and foremost is the music. Totally kills it for me. Pacing has been up and down, too. Would like more character consistency at times. Re-telling two movies in worse ways over longer periods of time. Actual time placement restricting more developments. Needs more Ozotto.

If you're interested and have the time (and I recognize not everyone does), I've done long-form reviews of each arc so far as part of our podcast: Beerus arc (bonus episode), Freeza arc (Episode #0393), Champa arc (Episode #0406), Future Trunks arc (Episode #0418). You also get other people bouncing ideas around so it's not just me! You're probably not the biggest fan, but hopefully you can spare a little time to see what I have to say. For those episodes, the review itself is generally the main focus and there's nothing beyond a minute or two kicking things off before we really get down to business. I guess I'd recommend the Trunks one first!

How about you? What's doing it for you / not doing it for you?
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::

User avatar
Lord Frieza
I Live Here
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:36 pm

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by Lord Frieza » Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:10 pm

sintzu wrote:
Lord Frieza wrote:I compare Super to DB/Z and you can deal with it, its my opinion and I don't need to justify it to you or anyone else.
That's because you can't. You can't justify the writing, the production, the rehashed character designs, etc.

Well I can and here we go. But first some ground rules I think. 1) If I come of as rude I, as always, apologist in advance. 2) As with all "I like/don't like" topics there will be some subjective/opinionated stuff within. That how it goes and we'll just have to deal with it. 3) I'm going to follow what TheMikado said and do this without saying "But in Z/GT" however I will make comments to dragon ball as a whole, since Super is part of a franchise that is more then fair I feel. 4) I'm only human ans am bound to mess up at point so bare with me. Fair?

Ok first my original statement still stands, you started this this topic with a challenging, blanket statement and I responded in kind. Funnily enough I, and every other Super fan DO NOT have to explain ourselves to anyone but then nor do you. But I want to so lets continue.

So I'm going to go pint by point on this one, make it easier to break down.

Comedy: Dragon ball is written by a man who is a confirmed gag manga writer and gags are in the DNA of this series. Humor is also subjective, what will work for me, will not work for you and vice versa. Also some people have a different level of whats acceptable and whats not. But there is more here to go over then just that.

Tien has funnily enough been played for gags in the series, not like the rest but both in the manga and anime they are there. The biggest one being Goku stealing his belt/cloth and making his trousers fall down during the 23rd Budokai. We also have him sticking his tongue out with the gang one cover art and his time on Kai's world in the anime. The reason he manly dose not get used for gags that much is simple, the guy is hardly ever around even in filler.

Piccolo is not "King Piccolo", like Vegeta he's evolved a lot since then and become more normal. Like Tien, he had a few gags thrown his way in cover art and the anime, there's also his time with Goten and Trunks.....and Gotenks. As a character who has gone from wasteland brooding anti-villain to hero, Piccolo has naturally become more accustomed to interacting with others and when you do that funny stuff will happen. Thats only natural. Piccolo having his eyes closed during a photo is funny, him babysitting Pan is cute and none of that is out of character for modern Piccolo who has softened up greatly since his creation. Now if this boils down to "you dont like that" well ok but thats not a problem with the show as many liked those moments. So we cannot argue here because its a subjective topic.

Vegeta's actions around Beerus are more then justified by the story, again your allowed to not like it but thats not a problem with the show. Thats your personal taste again.

Goku being stupid...eh...you'd need to give me a list here please. Some stuff really is not that big of a deal as many make it out to be, really its not. Goku has always been an idiot and his level of stupidity really dose change from Arc to Arc.


Animation: Oh boy this is the big one. Nothing can be said about this shows beginnings, its well documented and Toei have already said there piece and there was some mishandling there.

However since the end of the Champa arc we have had fairly consistent animation with errors and poor quality that crop up no more often then any other show. Look up any long running anime like Naruto or One Piece and you wont have to look hard to badly animated stuff throughout. Dragon Ball had the same thing from its first arc to its last. Its nothing new and nothing to get irate over. People seem to have got it into there heads that some how Super was going to be treated differently from its passed self and contemporaries when there was no evidence that was ever the case. Its treated the same as everything else by Toei. That part is really over-expectation on a lot of peoples part, sorry but thats the truth. As someone who as watched some every, every old anime (70s and older) trust me when I say errors like this are no something new they happen. As for its general style, we where never gonna get the old look back, that style is long dead and Toei has a budget, is the same as the movies but one a the budget of a TV show. Perfect, no, awful, far from it.

Dragon Ball has always been inconsistent with hight, people have already given evidence here showing this.

Designs in dragon ball have always been " drawn on a whim" once again thats how this show works. There's no over arcing grand plan for a lot of this stuff, hell Super has had more long term though put into it then most of Dragon Ball ever did. Also a core theme of Dragon Ball is "looks are not everything", Botamo is invulnerable to damage, Magetta was as powerful as SS Vegeta and Zen-Oh can destroy entire universe with zero effort. This is a long established part of Dragon Balls DNA as a franchise. Again this all boils down to taste, you dont like it? Fair enough but thats not a problem with the show.

Power Level Problem - Ok just to get it out of the way....F### POWER LEVELS! Sorry just needed to get that out, on with the show.

Now I know what this comes from and it aint the Trunks arc, you know were this comes from and it aint the Trunks arc....we all know were this comes from and it aint the kami damned Trunks arc. Its the thing thats kicked off this little wave of "Super Sucks" and "Super fans ignore criticism" topics...funnily enough as I predicted it would. Its called Episode 84, its the spark for this weeks festivities and you cannot deny that. Did this series have some Bull S###power ups, yes in the from of SS Rage, did this series have some ass pull attacks, yes with a Genki Sword and an instant Mafuba again from Trunks. Not great, poor writing there, no argument. However while the Manga has more then messed up a lot of the time, the anime has always kept its power scaling pretty clear and well defined, with hickups I'm not denying that. What happened was, and this is really the best part, Krillian did something after all these years and the community had an issue with it. He kicked Gohan out of bounds after using a cool new technique which most people were fine with given Gohan's attitude. But then he uses smart tricks and tactics, the thing he was most well known for back in the day, to get one over on Goku....eyebrows start raising, questions were asked but no tables were flipped. Then Toei, in a poor choice for marketing, had Goku go Blue and Krillian pushed back his kamehameha for all of a moment and that was it! Then all this came crawling out of the wood work and people picked at old grips that were almost healed over. One episode, rather one thing did this....the story tellers decided to sacrifice some logic for some good character moments.

I'm sorry but I find that pathetic.

Fights: Aside from one or two battles sorry but a cannot agree with you here at all. I've found most of the battle in this series bar the RoF arc fights and Frosts fight with Goku to have been blood pumpingly entertaining. Thats all that can be really said there. We'll just have to agree to disagree.

And there you go...
VegettoEX wrote:I don't need to justify it, because I'm not on the creative team and I have absolutely no horse in the race over whether it's successful or not. No skin off my back.

I can, however, have a great conversation about certain aspects I like, those I dislike, what I think is working and what's not.

If you're not willing to have that conversation, I suggest you find another place to rant!
And I hope you find this more to you taste if your comment was directed at me.

Gochu
Temporarily Banned
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 11:11 am

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by Gochu » Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:15 pm

Asura wrote:
BlueBasilisk wrote:I don't get why people get so bent out of shape about this when in Dragon Ball, Kid Goku learned the Kamehameha, his signature technique and an amazing ability in-universe at the time that took Roshi 50 years to master, after seeing Roshi do it once. No instruction or anything. He just tried it once and it worked perfectly. Similarly, he learned the Mafuba with no trouble at all. Could pull the technique off the first time he tried it. He spent the night practicing his aim for the sake of a joke. Him harassing Turtle like that was funny. And it's not like Trunks figured it out on his own. He even tried that and made an ass of himself until Bulma remembered that she had a video of Piccolo (a teacher) demonstrating and explaining how it worked. The only difference is that he had someone hold the jar when he did it and stuck the landing.
Your argument is a bit flawed, and here's why. Kid Goku was able to pull off a Kamehameha after only seeing Roshi do it once. But his Kamehameha was weak, extremely small, and nowhere near the power of Roshi's. It took Goku a lot of training until he could use the kamehameha as effectively as Roshi did. Not only that, Goku saw Roshi do it. Trunks has never seen Goku create the genki dama for example, so how would he even know how to do it if he wasn't taught it, and had never seen it before?

It also goes back to the Mafuba. Goku trains for an entire night until he's able to do it right, and nowhere is it ever implied he practiced for the night as a "joke". That's a nonsense excuse that has absolutely no basis. You also say that Goku learned the Mafuba with no trouble and pulled it off on his first try. You should re-watch the episode again, since that didn't happen. Goku completely misses his first try and sends Turtle flying across the ocean, almost into a mountain. He then misses a second time after that and sends Turtle into the water. We don't see Goku actually nail the Mafuba until morning. Trunks sees Piccolo's instructional video once, and is now a master at it. Again, Kid Goku was able to copy someone too, but his version was obviously way weaker until he practiced and trained it, Trunks is somehow a born natural and able to nail that shit no problemo.
Thanks, I really didn't want to explain all this. I'll also add that Goku is a battle genius, and as a saiyan ki blasts come inherently easy to him. Trunks also isn't particularly gifted besides his ability to go ssj, which is only due to his genetics from vegeta already attaining ssj status when he was conceived. Trunks has very little battle sense from lack of experience. He couldnt attain or even be aware of ascended saiyan without vegeta's help. And he was also stupid enough to use beefcake mode on cell despite the obvious speed decrease. Point is, trunks isn't really skilled, and to perfect the Mafuba in 3-4 minutes from a cell phone video, when it took goku all night with master roshi cueing him the entire time, is ridiculous. It's just a classic example of how far super will go to fit the narrative.

I know DB and Z had its fair share of plot-holes. But it's as if super seeks them out because they really don't care anymore. They also seem to stack them almost just to piss of the die-hard fan or to give off the feel that the show is a parody/not to be taken seriously anymore.

Gochu
Temporarily Banned
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 11:11 am

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by Gochu » Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:28 pm

Also, a lot of people seem to like Hitto. I really thought he was a garbage character, although compared to the other guys at the tournament like mean winnie the pooh I suppose he was a god-send.

Hitto was very unoriginal looking. He had absolutely no backstory besides being a cosmic hitman. He barely talked. He barely even moved. He had no unique attacks at all; no flair. Half the time his hands were in his pockets. His fight was underwhelming because he can stop time, so they could make it as simplistic as possible and it would still make sense.

I am a fan of anything to do with time/time dilation, but that means I also found Guldo just as interesting. Hitto's other whole strategy was a huge cop out, he was literally the "I'm not even trying" man. No explanation needed from that point forward, he only has to try harder.

User avatar
BlueBasilisk
I Live Here
Posts: 3062
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:58 am

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by BlueBasilisk » Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:50 pm

Asura wrote:Your argument is a bit flawed, and here's why. Kid Goku was able to pull off a Kamehameha after only seeing Roshi do it once. But his Kamehameha was weak, extremely small, and nowhere near the power of Roshi's. It took Goku a lot of training until he could use the kamehameha as effectively as Roshi did. Not only that, Goku saw Roshi do it. Trunks has never seen Goku create the genki dama for example, so how would he even know how to do it if he wasn't taught it, and had never seen it before?
That's because Kid Goku was nowhere near as strong as Roshi, who performed the technique in his powered up form. Goku wouldn't approach Roshi's level until the 21st Budokai. Now the situation is reversed, Trunks and Goku are vastly stronger than Roshi and they don't have the same problems he did using the technique. I wasn't talking about that spirit sword business, I was talking strictly about the Mafuba.
Asura wrote:It also goes back to the Mafuba. Goku trains for an entire night until he's able to do it right, and nowhere is it ever implied he practiced for the night as a "joke". That's a nonsense excuse that has absolutely no basis. You also say that Goku learned the Mafuba with no trouble and pulled it off on his first try. You should re-watch the episode again, since that didn't happen. Goku completely misses his first try and sends Turtle flying across the ocean, almost into a mountain. He then misses a second time after that and sends Turtle into the water. We don't see Goku actually nail the Mafuba until morning. Trunks sees Piccolo's instructional video once, and is now a master at it. Again, Kid Goku was able to copy someone too, but his version was obviously way weaker until he practiced and trained it, Trunks is somehow a born natural and able to nail that shit no problemo.
I never said Goku did it as a joke, now did I? It's very clear that whole scene was being played for laughs for the audience's sake by having Goku pick on poor Turtle. Despite Roshi saying the technique is difficult and dangerous, Goku gets the rest of it right on the first go. The only thing he has trouble with is getting Turtle in the pot, and it's funnier that he can't. It's slapstick. If Goku had been put in Trunks' position I have no doubt he would have had exactly the same results, because as funny as it would be to see him flinging Zamasu into the sea for half the day, that sort of slapstick has no place in a dramatic scene.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by sintzu » Tue Apr 04, 2017 7:14 pm

cheddarsword wrote:Overlooking a few smaller problems allows you to enjoy something you might otherwise not.
I wouldn't still be watching after 80+ episodes if I didn't enjoy it to some degree but that isn't going to stop me from wanting it to be better than it is.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
HybridSaiyan
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1113
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:18 pm
Location: UK

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by HybridSaiyan » Tue Apr 04, 2017 7:25 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXqonHhNe6o

If Supr can offer something is beautiful as this, I'd...cry.

User avatar
Asura
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by Asura » Tue Apr 04, 2017 7:44 pm

BlueBasilisk wrote:I never said Goku did it as a joke, now did I?


Uh, yes actually you did. Word for word you said, and I quote, "He spent the night practicing his aim for the sake of a joke".

BlueBasilisk wrote:It's very clear that whole scene was being played for laughs for the audience's sake by having Goku pick on poor Turtle. Despite Roshi saying the technique is difficult and dangerous, Goku gets the rest of it right on the first go.
Again, what on earth are you talking about? Did we see two different episodes? Goku did not get it right on his first go, we see him screwing up over and over again until morning when he finally gets Turtle in the pot.

BlueBasilisk wrote:The only thing he has trouble with is getting Turtle in the pot, and it's funnier that he can't. It's slapstick.
So you're telling me that the only thing he has trouble with is him literally being able to use the technique? :lol: I mean, the entire point of the technique is to get the person into the pot, you can't just be like "Oh well he didn't get him in the pot yet, but he got the rest of it down so clearly he's mastered the Mafuba on the first try!"

It's like saying Videl's only problem she had when learning to fly, was that she didn't know how to put the energy under her and start flying, otherwise she totally nailed flying :think:

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Tue Apr 04, 2017 7:48 pm

Asura wrote:
BlueBasilisk wrote:I never said Goku did it as a joke, now did I?


Uh, yes actually you did. Word for word you said, and I quote, "He spent the night practicing his aim for the sake of a joke".
You're misunderstanding. BlueBasilisk is saying that the Mafuba itself served the purpose of a joke, not that Goku learned it for his newest stand-up special (or whatever you're thinking).
Retired.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: How Can Fans Compare This To DB/DBZ With A Straight Face?

Post by sintzu » Tue Apr 04, 2017 7:51 pm

Lord Frieza wrote:
sintzu wrote:
Lord Frieza wrote:I compare Super to DB/Z and you can deal with it, its my opinion and I don't need to justify it to you or anyone else.
That's because you can't. You can't justify the writing, the production, the rehashed character designs, etc.

Well I can and here we go.
I'm sorry I ever doubted you.

You bring up good points but unlike Super, I don't think the original ever tried too hard to be funny for example, it felt natural while here it feels forced most of the time like with Goku.

Same thing with the production, the fights had animation issues for sure but they felt epic and every blow felt impactful which is something Super doesn't do that well.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

Post Reply