Dragonball FO?

Jerseymilk · Post by **Jerseymilk** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:25 pm

I think we all here need to remember the saying, "There are no dumb questions, only dumb answers."

Post by **VegettoEX** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:32 pm

Kid Trunks wrote:Dude, all I can say is I'm not up to scratch on this kind of stuff regarding Dragonball on the internet. I just asked a question, I'm not sorry for that.Ask questions, get answers. So just get over it. If it annoys you that much then just ignore it

I think what people are more concerned with was your lack of own research before asking the question. All it took was a quick look at the Wikipedia entry page and one Google search before you could prove beyond all reasonable doubt that there's (obviously) no such thing.

Furthermore, as you agreed to in the forum rules, you're expected to type properly on this forum. Punctuation, capitalization, and all that jazz will apply.

As for everyone else, you need to keep in mind that not everyone is necessarily as old as me/you/us and can take so much knowledge for granted.

BlueSky · Post by **Kaboom** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:41 pm

I think it would do everyone some good if we could at least try to answer legitimate, innocent questions without automatically being so hostile.

Kid Trunks · Post by **Kid Trunks** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:49 pm

Jerseymilk wrote:"There are no dumb questions, only dumb answers."

Exactly.

think what people are more concerned with was your lack of own research before asking the question. All it took was a quick look at the Wikipedia entry page and one Google search before you could prove beyond all reasonable doubt that there's (obviously) no such thing.

A fair point, but I generally just get my information here since I have only been really using the internet for over a year now. So I just thought it would be simplier to ask someone here. Even if I did a search on "FO", I still wouldn't have been certain. This was the only way I could be certain.

Furthermore, as you agreed to in the forum rules, you're expected to type properly on this forum. Punctuation, capitalization, and all that jazz will apply.

I thought I was doing all that stuff right. No?

And thanks Ssj Kaboom dude.

Raki · Post by **Raki** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:50 pm

I thought this thread would be done by now. Dragonbal FO=fake,end of story.

Magica · Post by **Magica** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:00 pm

SSj Kaboom wrote:I think it would do everyone some good if we could at least try to answer legitimate, innocent questions without automatically being so hostile.

IAWTC (I agree with this comment).

Sheesh, people.

MisterFlashdude · Post by **MisterFlashdude** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:13 pm

The article has already been deleted, so I don't really see why the thread needs to be kept open.

Snail · Post by **Snail** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:21 pm

Magica wrote:
SSj Kaboom wrote:I think it would do everyone some good if we could at least try to answer legitimate, innocent questions without automatically being so hostile.
IAWTC (I agree with this comment).

Sheesh, people.

And right after the christmas holidays too. *SIGH.

JAPPO · Post by **JAPPO** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:31 pm

Oh, it's true. My cousin in Japan told me so, why would he lie?

Post by **desirecampbell** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:41 pm

SSj Kaboom wrote:I think it would do everyone some good if we could at least try to answer legitimate, innocent questions without automatically being so hostile.

If the question was 'is Piccolo's special attack called special beam canon?' we'd be all over it with kana and scans and screenshots - but this is 'dur, is this completely unreferenced Internet page accurate? There's nothing to corroborate this information of another high profile animated series, and I haven't done any kind of research myself, but gawl-lee I thought y'all nice people would do the legwork for me.'

The question was asked, then answered, then asked again.

Xyex · Post by **Xyex** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:50 pm

desirecampbell wrote:If the question was 'is Piccolo's special attack called special beam canon?' we'd be all over it with kana and scans and screenshots - but this is 'dur, is this completely unreferenced Internet page accurate? There's nothing to corroborate this information of another high profile animated series, and I haven't done any kind of research myself, but gawl-lee I thought y'all nice people would do the legwork for me.'

Oh, come on! Lay off, geez. When you want to know something you ask the knowledgeble, which is exactly what this thread was for. I could see all this crap if he'd come in here touting it as fact and persisted to do so against evidence. It was a question, nothing more.

Grow up, people.

Jerseymilk · Post by **Jerseymilk** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:56 pm

It may be a hard concept for some people here to understand, but there are still people out there that aren't very computer and/or internet saavy. Hence what would seem like a logical step to you, wouldn't occur to him to try. That's the point some of us are making. Try and remember that next time guys. He knew enough to try here at least as opposed to somewhere like GameFAQs.

SuperSaiyan3Goku · Post by **SuperSaiyan3Goku** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:10 pm

1. All he did was ask about what this "Dragonball FO" crap was. He knows that Daizex is the greatest Dragonball information source there is and if there was anything about this so-called "new series" on here, he knew to come here. Hey, at least he didn't go to some shit-pile like GameFAQs.

2. Don't believe half the stuff you read on Wikipedia, unless you're 100% certain that it's legit. Some bastard probably just made that article to screw us off and make us believe that there's a "new" Dragonball series that doesn't and will never exist.

Somebody please lock this now.

Snail · Post by **Snail** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:16 pm

No offense Desire, but..cynical much?

Kendamu · Post by **Kendamu** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:39 pm

Big Momma wrote:
Adamant wrote:An example of vandalism, apparantly. I love Wikipedia.
A friend of mine once put another friend of mine as the definition of "nub".

@Kendamu: I like Widescreen DBZ...and I don't really like his score.(Except the song used when Kid Boo was killed.)

I was just fuckin' around. No offense to anyone who really does like those things. I was just describing the "9-year-olds" that FUNi is advertising these sets towards.

MisterFlashdude · Post by **MisterFlashdude** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:53 pm

MisterFlashdude wrote:The article has already been deleted, so I don't really see why the thread needs to be kept open.

Uh, nevermind... It's back...

And without any of the vandalism.

Someone's really adamant about tricking the uninformed.

Edit:

What's really annoying is that this 'DrVanDre' isn't content with just whipping up a bullshit wiki about 'FO', he's got to try sticking his newfound "facts" into other Dragonball articles.

SSJToreto · Post by **SSJToreto** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:26 pm

Check out who's the writer... Borat?

AnzuMazaki · Post by **AnzuMazaki** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:14 pm

New Info of Dragonball FO wrote: Dragon Ball FO" is the newest, upcoming addition to the Dragon Ball (anime)-series, succeeding Dragon Ball AF. 'FO' means Fuck Off. "Dragon Ball FO" was announced by your mom (important staff of Bird Studios), 31. December, 2007. The date for the first episode has yet to be revealed, through your mom revealed it to be in the fourth quarter of 2008, through the date might get pushed later on due to problems with one of the mainwriters, who is stated to be no other than your mom herself. "Dragon Ball FO" will focus on Lunch, being the first "Dragon Ball"-based anime to not have Yamcha as the maincharacter. Just like with Dragon Ball AF, VeggetoEX won't be involved with the story or production.

The new info is much better, showing it that it is truely another DB AF, nice job to whoever edited this article.

.

SSJToreto · Post by **SSJToreto** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:16 pm

AnzuMazaki wrote:
New Info of Dragonball FO wrote: Dragon Ball FO" is the newest, upcoming addition to the Dragon Ball (anime)-series, succeeding Dragon Ball AF. 'FO' means Fuck Off. "Dragon Ball FO" was announced by your mom (important staff of Bird Studios), 31. December, 2007. The date for the first episode has yet to be revealed, through your mom revealed it to be in the fourth quarter of 2008, through the date might get pushed later on due to problems with one of the mainwriters, who is stated to be no other than your mom herself. "Dragon Ball FO" will focus on Lunch, being the first "Dragon Ball"-based anime to not have Yamcha as the maincharacter. Just like with Dragon Ball AF, VeggetoEX won't be involved with the story or production.

The new info is much better, showing it that it is truely another DB AF, nioce job to whoever edited this article. .

Thanks! I also made a version with Borat, that got changed, but this one's still better

Chibi Mystic Gohan · Post by **Chibi Mystic Gohan** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:22 pm

The article has been deleted now. I made some amusing edits to it earlier, and some admin was getting on my case for "vandalising" the article and reverting my edits. I thought it was amusing that their "revision" contained such sentences as "Dragon Ball FO is the newest, upcoming addition to the Dragon Ball (anime)-series, succeeding Dragon Ball AF. 'FO' means Fuck Off."

What a joke.