Is Bulma immoral

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
jjgp1112
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7679
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Crooklyn

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by jjgp1112 » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:11 am

precita wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 11:58 pm I guess Piccolo is guilty for killing Krillin, Chioatzu and Roshi because King Piccolo or his henchmen Tambourine killed them and Piccolo has his fathers memories. But nobody considers Piccolo their killer, not even Krillin or Roshi themselves think that.

Bejita-sama did nothing wrong.
I mean, that's absolutely what Goku and the others thought and carried on as such. Why else would he be thinking of Krillin and Roshi with a tear in his eye immediately after killing Piccolo and saying he avenged them when Piccolo didn't actually do anything to Krillin? It was only through extreme, life-threatening circumstances that they wound up allying with Piccolo, and the Piccolo himself became a better person and did the work to earn their trust.

Is accessory/conspiracy to murder just a crime that doesn't exist in your mind?

But I'm saying this actually assuming you're arguing in good faith, and your post history gives me no reason to believe as such.
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler

User avatar
The Accountant
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2021 11:52 pm

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by The Accountant » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:18 am

Bulma was more immoral back in early Dragon Ball, but has improved drastically since. An example of these improvements displayed in her relationship with Trunks. I think it showcases the best in Bulma.

MyVisionity
Banned
Posts: 1834
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:51 pm
Location: US

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by MyVisionity » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:21 am

I think what makes it okay is that Vegeta didn't actually do the deed personally. That makes a *big* difference in regards to Bulma hooking up with him. It was already in the past to begin with, but that difference makes it all the more easier to leave it in the past and move on.

Also I think the comparisons being drawn here are off-base. Vegeta is not Bin Laden, or Manson, or Corleone. The Saiyans weren't terrorists or serial killers or mobsters. They were warriors challenging other warriors in a life-or-death battle for the planet. The Z-Senshi chose to fight and they lost. It's that simple. I'm not sure how much of that you could hold against Vegeta after a certain amount of time. Especially after everyone was resurrected. Especially if you weren't even a fighter in that battle.

precita wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 11:58 pm I guess Piccolo is guilty for killing Krillin, Chioatzu and Roshi because King Piccolo or his henchmen Tambourine killed them and Piccolo has his fathers memories. But nobody considers Piccolo their killer, not even Krillin or Roshi themselves think that.

Bejita-sama did nothing wrong.
Ma Junior is the reincarnated version of Daimao, so he's not exactly the same Piccolo as the first.

User avatar
jjgp1112
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7679
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Crooklyn

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by jjgp1112 » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:46 am

MyVisionity wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:21 am I think what makes it okay is that Vegeta didn't actually do the deed personally. That makes a *big* difference in regards to Bulma hooking up with him. It was already in the past to begin with, but that difference makes it all the more easier to leave it in the past and move on.

Also I think the comparisons being drawn here are off-base. Vegeta is not Bin Laden, or Manson, or Corleone. The Saiyans weren't terrorists or serial killers or mobsters. They were warriors challenging other warriors in a life-or-death battle for the planet. The Z-Senshi chose to fight and they lost. It's that simple. I'm not sure how much of that you could hold against Vegeta after a certain amount of time. Especially after everyone was resurrected. Especially if you weren't even a fighter in that battle.

Image

Pardon my French, but do y'all niggas just live in the twilight zone or something? The Saiyans were there with the express purpose of stealing the Dragon Balls AND wiping out the entire planet so they can sell it off on top of that. Vegeta even says as much. They introduce themselves by blowing up a city for shits and giggles. You cannot be serious right now.
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4151
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by Kid Buu » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:51 am

jjgp1112 wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:46 am
MyVisionity wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:21 am I think what makes it okay is that Vegeta didn't actually do the deed personally. That makes a *big* difference in regards to Bulma hooking up with him. It was already in the past to begin with, but that difference makes it all the more easier to leave it in the past and move on.

Also I think the comparisons being drawn here are off-base. Vegeta is not Bin Laden, or Manson, or Corleone. The Saiyans weren't terrorists or serial killers or mobsters. They were warriors challenging other warriors in a life-or-death battle for the planet. The Z-Senshi chose to fight and they lost. It's that simple. I'm not sure how much of that you could hold against Vegeta after a certain amount of time. Especially after everyone was resurrected. Especially if you weren't even a fighter in that battle.

Image

Pardon my French, but do y'all niggas just live in the twilight zone or something? The Saiyans were there with the express purpose of stealing the Dragon Balls AND wiping out the entire planet so they can sell it off on top of that. Vegeta even says as much. They introduce themselves by blowing up a city for shits and giggles. You cannot be serious right now.
Not to mention Tenshinhan already fought a Saibaman in a tournament rules situation and Vegeta blasted the Saibaman for losing. Pretty sure if it wasn't for that, the Saibaman wouldn't have resorted to suicide against Yamcha. Heck, even Nappa was against it.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

Dr. Casey
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 926
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:05 pm

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by Dr. Casey » Wed Jun 30, 2021 1:12 am

MyVisionity wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 6:47 pm
BWri wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 6:31 pm He'd just taken part in the genocide of the Namekians and openly bragged abut it with a smirk on his face. Bulma literally heard him say it. He killed them within that week, maybe even a few days prior. At best her desire to get with him was selfish. It doesn't speak well of her character.
That was like two years before they even got together. He was no longer murdering people when they hooked up.

It's not selfish at all. What's done is done. The past isn't pretty, but that's life.
:lol: I actually got a good laugh out of this, thank you. It's good to know that if I ever become a mass murderer, it'll be no biggie so long as I stop doing that and a couple years pass.
Princess Snake avatars courtesy of Kunzait, Chibi Goku avatar from Velasa.

User avatar
goku the krump dancer
I Live Here
Posts: 3662
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:34 pm

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by goku the krump dancer » Wed Jun 30, 2021 3:06 am

Lets not forget, the series proper acknowledges that Vegeta was a giant asshole for most of his life when Piccolo confirms that despite all his help against Freeza and the androids, it didn't make up for all the worlds he took glee in destroying, so he was still destined for hell after his sacrifice. Shit it may be a Dub line ( I think) but in The Trunks Special Bulma actually says to him that Vegeta was most likely in hell because he was a sadistic serial killer. Porunga bringing him back was a huge bro move, he actually got lucky.
It's not too late. One day, it will be.
Peace And Power MF DOOM!
Peace and Power Kevin Samuels

User avatar
Aim
Banned
Posts: 761
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2020 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by Aim » Wed Jun 30, 2021 3:21 am

goku the krump dancer wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 8:57 am Its not on Bulma to solve all of the world's problems, her contribution to society is due to the "Capsule" technology that her and her father's company is named after. That said, it was that same capsule tech that allowed Nam to secure acres of what for his village, that only experienced a drought because of the Sun, which is something that can't really be fought against in Old World villages like that. There's no reason to believe she didn't write Oob's family a nice hefty check after she figured out what was going on post the 28th tournament but even still she's not obligated to do that. She's one of the world's geniuses not the only one, since even she was initially confused by Gero's android blue prints.
A super world genius capable of learning even further to create a time machine absolutely does hold the weight of doing good for the world. I mean, we didn’t get this far hoarding wealth and keeping people poor, not saying this is what Bulma does, but there’s villages out there that are dirt poor, Bulma could easily solve this issue. Though I’m unsure if she’s even aware of it.

If I am capable of saving another human beings life or making life easier for them without doing much because I am a super genius, I’d feel obligated to do that for my fellow human being. It’s a different story if it would take up all my time.

User avatar
Aim
Banned
Posts: 761
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2020 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by Aim » Wed Jun 30, 2021 3:23 am

BWri wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 1:53 pm Her attraction to an evil person like Vegeta is primal so I can't exactly blame her for that,
I can’t say I agree, I don’t see anything that is in our nature being attracted to evil people

User avatar
Aim
Banned
Posts: 761
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2020 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by Aim » Wed Jun 30, 2021 3:26 am

TobyS wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 6:44 pm
The difference is between DB and marvel is that reed is supposed to be a super hero and a good guy. So it's immersion breaking a guy who can make a time machine can't make vertical farms and clean energy.

However all the DB characters are selfish bastards and don't really pretend to be otherwise, and that's funny and fine, and so it's not ruining shit at the back of your mind.

All billionaires are kinda bastards, extracting the surplus labour from their workers in the form of profit . Committing untold structural violence by hoarding that much wealth. But no less bastardy then the entire dragon team letting two cyborgs they know wipe out the earth be completed because they think it will be fun to do Kung Fu on them as long as they are prepared this time and have worked out harder.

It could be CC is a living wage paying carbon neutral employer with a massive educational outreach and philanthropy program but the fact they weren't assassinated by the likes of Taopaipai by some other billionaire means they probably aren't.

We don't really know how the government or tax system works in the dragon world. Maybe Marxism was never a thing and the proles never achieved class consciousness anywhere.

The nameks seem like agrarian communists and are stronger and spirituality more evolved then humanity so make of that what you will...
I love you

User avatar
Jack Bz
Regular
Posts: 585
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:44 pm

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by Jack Bz » Wed Jun 30, 2021 5:58 am

jjgp1112 wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:46 am
MyVisionity wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:21 am I think what makes it okay is that Vegeta didn't actually do the deed personally. That makes a *big* difference in regards to Bulma hooking up with him. It was already in the past to begin with, but that difference makes it all the more easier to leave it in the past and move on.

Also I think the comparisons being drawn here are off-base. Vegeta is not Bin Laden, or Manson, or Corleone. The Saiyans weren't terrorists or serial killers or mobsters. They were warriors challenging other warriors in a life-or-death battle for the planet. The Z-Senshi chose to fight and they lost. It's that simple. I'm not sure how much of that you could hold against Vegeta after a certain amount of time. Especially after everyone was resurrected. Especially if you weren't even a fighter in that battle.

Image

Pardon my French, but do y'all niggas just live in the twilight zone or something? The Saiyans were there with the express purpose of stealing the Dragon Balls AND wiping out the entire planet so they can sell it off on top of that. Vegeta even says as much. They introduce themselves by blowing up a city for shits and giggles. You cannot be serious right now.
Cracked up at this. I can't believe some of the stuff I'm reading here. The saiyans were unimaginably worse than an average serial killer.

The first time we ever see Vegeta he is literally eating the arm of someone he killed on another planet, whose civilisation he destroyed

User avatar
SupremeKai25
I Live Here
Posts: 4664
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by SupremeKai25 » Wed Jun 30, 2021 6:30 am

Vegeta literally committed mundicide, if Zamasu, Cell, Moro, and pretty much every other villain are evil because of that, then so is Vegeta:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xnqtg0bte6w
At his core Zamasu is good like Shin, though I guess you could say he was so fastidious that it backfired. But you know, for this "Future Trunks Arc" you had to depict Zamasu and Trunks' inner conflict, right? If this was back when I was drawing the manga myself then I doubt if I could have done it. I mean, I'm not very good at depicting the characters' psychology on the page. So this all came together because now I only have to think up the story. [...] On my own, I doubt I would have been able to express Zamasu's fall to the dark side.
Akira Toriyama, DBS vol.4 joint interview with Toyotaro

User avatar
TheGreatness25
I Live Here
Posts: 4981
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:36 am

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by TheGreatness25 » Wed Jun 30, 2021 7:00 am

As a kid, I thought, "Man, Vegeta is so awesome!" But as an adult, I did find it horrible that at one point, nobody seemed horrified at the horrible things that he's done.

BUT, unfortunately, Toriyama wrote him to be basically forgiven for everything. We're meant to either forgive or turn a blind eye to everything he's done. So too have all the characters in Dragon World including Goku, Gohan, Kuririn, Piccolo, etc., etc. And even characters that didn't like Vegeta, like Piccolo or Tenshinhan, didn't dislike him because of everything he's done, but because of what he's done to them. And the dislike wasn't strong enough to stop them from working with him.

Unfortunately, the God of Dragon World basically told us to ignore Vegeta's terrible past because everyone else did.

I wish Vegeta was written differently -- I wish that he didn't have that much blood on his hands personally and I wish that we got to see remorse for everything as he realized that his motivations and actions were misguided. Even the remorse would've kind of made up for it -- like Ed Norton's character in American History X. He was such a terrible person, but he legitimately felt remorse and tried to make up for it. That's how I wish Vegeta was portrayed since Namek -- going out of his way to help people and try to make up for his past. But that's not the character we get. And unfortunately, the exact same thing is happening with Freeza now and I'm having trouble coping with him just being part of the team.

User avatar
Yuli Ban
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 827
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:07 am
Location: New Orleans, LA
Contact:

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by Yuli Ban » Wed Jun 30, 2021 7:01 am

Bulma? She wasn't really immoral, just kind of an asshole at times (and usually rightfully so because the situations she was dealing with were bullshit). Most of Dragon Ball was that way, by Toriyama's own admission. They weren't really likeable people, but we liked following their journey.
Jack Bz wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 5:58 am
jjgp1112 wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:46 am
MyVisionity wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:21 am I think what makes it okay is that Vegeta didn't actually do the deed personally. That makes a *big* difference in regards to Bulma hooking up with him. It was already in the past to begin with, but that difference makes it all the more easier to leave it in the past and move on.

Also I think the comparisons being drawn here are off-base. Vegeta is not Bin Laden, or Manson, or Corleone. The Saiyans weren't terrorists or serial killers or mobsters. They were warriors challenging other warriors in a life-or-death battle for the planet. The Z-Senshi chose to fight and they lost. It's that simple. I'm not sure how much of that you could hold against Vegeta after a certain amount of time. Especially after everyone was resurrected. Especially if you weren't even a fighter in that battle.

Image

Pardon my French, but do y'all niggas just live in the twilight zone or something? The Saiyans were there with the express purpose of stealing the Dragon Balls AND wiping out the entire planet so they can sell it off on top of that. Vegeta even says as much. They introduce themselves by blowing up a city for shits and giggles. You cannot be serious right now.
Cracked up at this. I can't believe some of the stuff I'm reading here. The saiyans were unimaginably worse than an average serial killer.

The first time we ever see Vegeta he is literally eating the arm of someone he killed on another planet, whose civilisation he destroyed
A lot of people forget that the Saiyans were basically written as Thermonuclear Klingons, exceptionally savage murderers on a galactic scale whose ferocity and psychopathic lust for death and battle made them a feared force even long after their extinction.
Heck, that's part of why I dislike Gine''s execution and the softening of Bardock. It fucks with the irony that Son Goku's such a lovably, friendly doof. Imagine Jackie Chan, except his father was Miguel Treviño Morales and his people were the Waffen SS. The Saiyans' whole purpose in the story was to show how different Goku was from them (as well as why Goku was such a punchmonkey).

But ultimately this is just a silly kung fu fantasy story that doesn't even know how to take itself seriously, so who gives a shit.

Also, there's the distance we have between fantasy and reality, so it doesn't matter how evil they were; it's not like their crimes actually happened.

Why else are so many people fans of Hannibal Lector?
The Yabanverse
Saiyan subspecies-centric worldbuilding fanverse

User avatar
Koitsukai
I Live Here
Posts: 4767
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 5:02 pm

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by Koitsukai » Wed Jun 30, 2021 7:59 am

Yeah, what the hell? saiyans never challenged other warriors, there weren't other warriors because they killed them all, and their babies, and their planets... they were space hooligans.
Can't remember if it was in the manga as well, but they were following Yamcha's death on TV or on Baba's ball, and they probably heard Vegeta cracking jokes at Yamcha's corpse, "remove that piece of meat, it's starting to stink up the place". A keeper.

Dating Ted Bundy is dead wrong, but dating him when you were friends with his victims, or dated one for years... damn, that's cold. Can't believe the argument is "oh, but it happened in the past, your complaint is so last april"

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6389
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by Cipher » Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:43 am

Everyone always talks about how immoral Bulma is for hooking up with Vegeta, but never how immoral Vegeta is for hooking up with Bulma.

However, they’re both going to burn in Hell for not saving themselves for marriage, and that’s the facts, Jack.

User avatar
PurestEvil
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1951
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2020 2:34 pm
Location: Constantinopolee!

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by PurestEvil » Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:48 am

Cipher wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:43 am Everyone always talks about how immoral Bulma is for hooking up with Vegeta, but never how immoral Vegeta is for hooking up with Bulma.

However, they’re both going to burn in Hell for not saving themselves for marriage, and that’s the facts, Jack.
Vegeta has done things 1000 times worse than extramarital intercourse, fam
This post was brought to you by 魔族

Rest in Peace, Toriyama-san

User avatar
Cursed Lemon
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1407
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:29 pm
Location: Location, Location
Contact:

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by Cursed Lemon » Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:05 am

jjgp1112 wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:46 amImage

Pardon my French, but do y'all niggas just live in the twilight zone or something? The Saiyans were there with the express purpose of stealing the Dragon Balls AND wiping out the entire planet so they can sell it off on top of that. Vegeta even says as much. They introduce themselves by blowing up a city for shits and giggles. You cannot be serious right now.
Thank you for saving my time.
Special Beam Cannon!

(゚Д゚)σ 弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌⊃

MyVisionity
Banned
Posts: 1834
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:51 pm
Location: US

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by MyVisionity » Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:09 am

jjgp1112 wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:46 am
MyVisionity wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:21 am They were warriors challenging other warriors in a life-or-death battle for the planet. The Z-Senshi chose to fight and they lost. It's that simple.
The Saiyans were there with the express purpose of stealing the Dragon Balls AND wiping out the entire planet so they can sell it off on top of that. Vegeta even says as much. They introduce themselves by blowing up a city for shits and giggles.
The Saiyans are a warrior race. They are fighters at heart who love and crave battle. Like I said, they were warriors challenging other warriors in battle. It's what the Z-Senshi were doing there. They weren't some poor victims who were helplessly slaughtered by the Saiyans. They were martial artists who fought and lost. I can see why someone might not hold anything against Vegeta in the long run.

Koitsukai wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 7:59 am Dating Ted Bundy is dead wrong, but dating him when you were friends with his victims, or dated one for years... damn, that's cold. Can't believe the argument is "oh, but it happened in the past, your complaint is so last april"
Ted Bundy wasn't a fighter nor were his victims. And none of them ever came back to life.

User avatar
Koitsukai
I Live Here
Posts: 4767
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 5:02 pm

Re: Is Bulma immoral

Post by Koitsukai » Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:29 am

You know that if they didn't fight back they would've gotten destroyed, right? it wasn't a Tenkaichi Budokai gone wrong.

But hey, it wasn't Geets doing the killing, so I guess that leaves Hitler off the hook as well.

Locked