Hey
Cipher, I appreciate your response.
Cipher wrote: Sat Jun 04, 2022 6:45 am
If the intent is for Super Saiyan 2 Trunks to be matching a Goku who is astronomically stronger than his Boo arc self, why would Goku's comparison to Gohan only come out after Trunks transforms into SS2? He'd have been stronger than Cell Games-era Gohan the whole time. And in those shocking circumstances, the more relevant comment would have been Goku comparing Trunks to himself.
That's by far the more immediate way to signal things to the reader in that case.
The Trunks scene is really what locks in no super-strong Goku/Vegeta approach being taken in the manga for me--(which means, yes, you need to assume slightly different events in its "F" equivalent to fit with its "Battle of Gods" changes)--we get an SS2 Trunks compared favorably to SS2 Gohan, only after he transforms, using homage dialogue last used to signal an SS2 who was also in Cell Games era Gohan's ballpark.
Sure, it's possible that he and Goku are both still wildly stronger than Cell Games-era Gohan in that scene, but then you have to assume that Goku decides to wait for the transformation to reveal that for no great reason, that we're mean to ignore the dialogue similarity, and that Toyotaro doesn't think there's anything strange about asking all those assumptions of the reader when just about any other approach could make the magnitude of their strength more clear. It requires so much reading against the grain, when the more immediate reading would be "Toyotaro gives us a scene that implies SS2 Trunks and Goku are in the original-run SS2 ballpark, because that's what he meant to do."
Like
Skar, I don't have an issue with a super-duper strong Trunks showing up if the story wants to give us that. Just like I don't have an issue with the story telling us #17 and Freeza can make their infamous leaps in
Super. I don't have an issue with it telling us Gohan can catch up to Super Saiyan Blue characters in his small amount of training leading up to the ToP. But it makes those things clear. I'm just not one to assume we're ever meant to read a scene that far around what its dialogue and comparisons imply. I think the idea that Trunks and Goku are in range of the SS2s we see in the original series is made about as clear as anything, really.
The whole purpose of the scene is to acknowledge how Trunks is much stronger warrior than Goku expected. Goku proposed the sparring session with Trunks to see where he stands so he can get an accurate evaluation of Trunks' abilities. His affirmation to Trunks is just acknowledgement of Trunks' progression and using the strongest mutual reference to nail that point across. Trunks' response to this doesn't stem from satisfaction and approval, it's an apathetic response. Trunks implies that it should be obvious, given that he had been training himself to death for ten years. That doesn't help prove that Trunks and Goku were in the ballpark of Gohan.
And your argument of what the author is pushing for doesn't really apply. Toyotaro had no issues establishing that Trunks was slightly better than Goku yet makes a vague comparison between Trunks and Gohan. The argument would hold water if Trunks gradually upped his power until he used Super Saiyan 2 against Goku but that's not what happened. Goku was intentionally made to be within the ballpark of Gohan back in the Buu Saga since there were previously established powers that were presented that had not been confirmed to be greater than Gohan (Super Saiyan, Super Saiyan 2 Burst vs. Yakon). Goku only surpassing Gohan once he goes Super Saiyan 2 at Full Power rather than prior with Super Saiyan and his Super Saiyan 2 Burst is the narrative pushing us in a certain direction. There is no narrative push here. Goku isn't going to affirm anything until he sees Trunks' power. Trunks just uses Super Saiyan 2 and Goku affirms his progress after he believes he saw
everything Trunks could do.
If we are forced to recontextualize certain events that go against the narrative such as Goku using God against Frieza, then your interpretation is not as intuitive as you might think it is.
Goku9001 wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 4:04 am
We can't. Goku and Vegeta made significant gains during the Goku Black arc. Aside from that, I don't think Cabba would be capable of fending off the Pride Troopers the way Super Saiyan Goku could.
This is kind of external to any ongoing conversations, but for clarity: Neither Goku nor Vegeta are implied to have gotten significantly stronger in the Black arc (manga) outside of new uses for their transformations. The results of Vegeta's day in the Room of Spirit and Time are attributed entirely to his being able to do the rapid God-Blue switch (with Black even being confused by the fact that he doesn't seem to have gotten noticeably stronger, despite gaining the upper hand in their fight), and Goku spends his one day of training learning the Mafuba, then pulls out Completed Super Saiyan Blue as an untested experiment. They're stronger overall, by the end, but it's basically all attributed to learning how to use Blue more effectively, rather than becoming stronger across all their transformations in a traditional sense.
The Moro arc has the first training sequence in which Goku and Vegeta are unambiguously mentioned/shown to be stronger than they previously had been while in the same forms. (Or rather, first since their time in the RoSaT in the U6 arc, probably, although the results of that are kept ambiguous, and no one even references their having gotten particularly stronger.)
I disagree. The sensu bean was given to Vegeta for the sole purpose of improving his power, which indicates that power is what was Vegeta was lacking against SSJ Goku Black and not the repercussions he was experiencing with the form. Goku and Trunks all express disappointment once they realize that the sensu bean didn't have an effect on Vegeta's power and attribute his loss solely based on that. The narrative explicitly places an emphasis on power and this gap was further increased once Goku Black obtained Rose. This coincides with what Black says during his rematch with Vegeta, where he confirms that Vegeta had gotten faster.
The only thing Goku says is that Blue cannot be maintained for that long but that's irrelevant to the point since SSJ Goku Black was shown to have the edge on Vegeta prior to his training even after Vegeta recovered his strength immediately.
This is reinforced when Goku confronts Zamasu. Even after using energy for the Mafuba, Goku makes it a point that Super Saiyan Blue won't
work for long , implying that there is a certain period of time where it will work i.e maintain his power before it teeters off.
Mr Baggins wrote: Sat Jun 04, 2022 5:54 am
To be clear, I wasn't simply talking about context. I'm saying the very statement
taken on its own isn't Beerus drawing a comparison for its own sake, unlike Goku's statement, which is, so it's not the same.
Subtext is beside the point. Just as the author didn't aim to compare Caulifla and Namek SS Goku until she fought in Super Saiyan, so too did the author not aim to compare Trunks and Gohan until he sparred using Super Saiyan 2. Evaluating whether Trunks used prior forms in-universe doesn't change the out-of-universe intent, which is readily apparent; if there's a direct strength comparison being made, then the form used to draw the comparison dictates its sufficiency.
As has been said, the audience's expected takeaway isn't meant to be scrutinized beyond that.
If I wanted to look at surrounding context and evidence, it's even further supported, but that's all stuff I've already covered at length.
But again, this is just me clarifying my position. I have absolutely no intention to keep arguing about this specific thing anymore because I realize I've made my point. There's no elucidation required, and even if there was, I think there's a wealth of other evidence in the series to back it up. Whether you concur or don't concur is up to you, but man, there's no reason to repeat the same talking points like this for over
five pages.
I agree with your position. Beerus' statement is clearly not intended to serve as a benchmark for Goku regardless of the comparison he draws between Goku and Frieza. The intended message is for Beerus to probe Goku and coax him into using more power which would result in the Super Saiyan God he was searching for. The context of Beerus' visit makes that very clear. Beerus visits Kaiosama in search of the Super Saiyan God. He is aware of Goku's Saiyan heritage and is privy to his Super Saiyan form. By default, the natural assumption is that Beerus intrigued by Goku and his transformations as it would lead him closer to the Super Saiyan God. This is why the default assumption inherently fails because Beerus' assertion of "I see how you defeated Frieza" emerging only after Goku uses Super Saiyan 2 is not evidence of Goku's inability to do so in weaker forms. Much like with the case of Goku's statement to Trunks, you're going to have to look a little deeper here rather blindly following generic statements.
Just to clarify, Frieza's comparison made between SSJ Caulifa to SSJ Goku (Namek) was used to establish that just because Frieza compared Caulifa to Namek Goku doesn't mean that is the only Super Saiyan. Whether you want to assume that this infers that Base Caulifa is weaker than SSJ Goku (Namek) is up to you. But, I would argue that this assumption is misguided given that Frieza's message was more of a means to convey to Caulifa that Super Saiyan isn't a shock to him as he's fought one in the past hence why he harkens back to his fight with Goku. Of course, if you omit the context, you can very well interpret it as a benchmark statement but it clearly isn't intended to be.