Is GT really inconsistent?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Nex Carnifex » Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:14 am

The kids at the dragon ball wiki claim it is plot hole free, though popular opinion seems to go against it. Go look at their inconsistencies page. I was wondering what was really true.

User avatar
Fox666
I Live Here
Posts: 4343
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Fox666 » Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:20 am

Would you even listen to the Dragon Ball wikia? Even the original manga has minor plot-holes. It's impossible for GT to not have plot-holes at all.

Of course it is not just free of plot-holes, but has tons of them. Want an example? Let's check episode 1:
• Nobody is supposed to get to Kami-sama temple without permission, however Pilaf & co get there.
• Why the radar never picked these hidden Dragon Balls before, if supposedly they can do it even on space?
• How can these Dragon Balls they exist if the child of Kakatz is not "alive" anymore?
• Why nobody ever mentioned these new Dragon Balls before? Why they needed to travel to namek to search for the namekian Dragon Balls?
And so on... I didn't even include Pilaf being evil (so not being revived) since that's arguable not a plot-hole.

If you look at the whole series, there are erros so blatant that's hard to believe. Androids having Ki? Freeza copied the Kienzan from Kuririn? I can't even think of what is the worst plot-hole.

Super Vegito
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:53 pm

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Super Vegito » Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:46 am

^Freeza and Cell not being able to die, because they're already dead is a good one too. If you want to go by the manga, then none of the villians in hell are suppose to have bodies, thus the entire the Super 17 saga couldn't have existed.

CatouttaHell
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1164
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:26 pm
Location: Mount Paozu
Contact:

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by CatouttaHell » Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:15 am

Power-wise GT is entirely one big inconsistency.

GT Base Goku > Pure Boo who was the biggest threat the universe has likely ever faced (and Anime-wise was a universe buster and on par with Super Vegetto) and yet the whole series consistently makes him look weak.

He needs SSjin 4 to lift a building, has trouble with space worms and some random bodyguard, etc.

Also power-wise absolutely nothing in the Super #17 arc makes a lick of sense. It somehow doesn't even line up logically with the arcs surrounding it.
Rocketman wrote:Where you born unable to understand jokes or is this the result of years of hard training?

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6411
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Cipher » Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:43 am

People blow it out of proportion. It's not as tight as Toriyama writing on his own (if you can even call that tight), but it's not unwatchably ridiculous by any means.
Fox666 wrote:• Nobody is supposed to get to Kami-sama temple without permission, however Pilaf & co get there.
Same way Bulma flies up there in the Cell arc? Dende and Popo are distracted by Goku and Oob's fight; Pilaf even comments on the fact that it's their one chance to sneak in. What's wrong with this? They explicitly address the fact that there's a distraction.
• Why the radar never picked these hidden Dragon Balls before, if supposedly they can do it even on space?
If Pilaf can block a Dragon Radar with a lead box, it's actually one or three steps less ridiculous to believe the magical depths of God's palace could do the same.
• How can these Dragon Balls they exist if the child of Kakatz is not "alive" anymore?
I couldn't point you to a specific scene right now, but if I recall correctly, the series is pretty explicit with the idea that the Ultimate Dragon Balls "reactivated" when God and Piccolo merged in the Cell arc. Makes sense, as it's basically the return of the original spirit before it split. So they were made by the original, unseparated "child of Katatz," turned to stone when he split into God and Piccolo, and then reactivated when they united again.
• Why nobody ever mentioned these new Dragon Balls before? Why they needed to travel to namek to search for the namekian Dragon Balls?
Because they didn't exist in the Namek arc. They would still have been deactivated. It's also possible they were forgotten even by God/Piccolo.
Androids having Ki?
There is kind of an error with this, but not the way you think. You're probably referring to the scene where Trunks says No. 17 has ki similar to No. 18. The androids were once humans and are still mostly organic. It's not unthinkable that they have ki. It's just a normal human amount of ki. Enough to sense at close distances and if you're familiar with the person, but not enough to say, search out among an entire planet or city.

The actual plot hole with this is Super Saiyan 4 Goku using teleportation to get near Super 17 during their fight, as he didn't seem to be able to just teleport to the androids back in the Cell arc. Then again, even this may not be a plot hole. We know Goku can teleport toward normal, human amounts of ki. He does so to get to Bulma and others several times. When 19 and 20 show up in Z, he obviously doesn't know what ki to search for until he meets them, and then he's knocked out by the heart virus. By the time they need to find 17 and 18 to stop Cell from becoming complete, Goku has never been near either of them, so finding their tiny ki to teleport to is out of the question. So this is really the first time Goku has even had the opportunity or necessity to teleport to an android. So, yeah, even this is excusable.
Freeza copied the Kienzan from Kuririn?
Never stated. Goku taunts Freeza for using Kuririn's technique, but it's just a taunt. It's kind of stupid and confusing, but it's clearly Freeza's purple colored disc and not Kuririn's. So it's just ... kind of awkward. But not really a plot hole.
Super Vegito wrote:If you want to go by the manga, then none of the villians in hell are suppose to have bodies, thus the entire the Super 17 saga couldn't have existed.
GT doesn't take place in the same universe as the manga though. It's clearly part of Toei's anime universe, as it reuses elements which only previously appeared in anime filler. (Tsufuru-jin, the sacred water, etc)

As for relative powers, not touching that with a ten-foot-pole. But I've always watched the series with the assumption that non significant power increases have been made from the end of Z, and I find it works much better that way. The "Goku is as strong as Kid Boo now" thing isn't ever really substantiated.

The Super 17 arc is indeed a bit of a mess, but a lot of it is just presented poorly; it doesn't make any direct power comparisons in the dialogues, so it's all just making judgements based on what you see.

What are the actual plot holes?

Off the top of my head, Vegeta knowing what Tsufuru-jin's ki feels like is kind of difficult to work around. Cell and Freeza being unable to die in Hell directly contradicts the rules we know from the Boo arc. And there's one scene where Kaiou is mysteriously back in his old house, which should have been blown up by Cell.

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7976
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by dbgtFO » Tue Aug 09, 2011 12:03 pm

Cipher wrote:
• How can these Dragon Balls they exist if the child of Kakatz is not "alive" anymore?
I couldn't point you to a specific scene right now, but if I recall correctly, the series is pretty explicit with the idea that the Ultimate Dragon Balls "reactivated" when God and Piccolo merged in the Cell arc. Makes sense, as it's basically the return of the original spirit before it split. So they were made by the original, unseparated "child of Katatz," turned to stone when he split into God and Piccolo, and then reactivated when they united again.
I think there actually might be a plothole here, at least going by what we know from the previous series and Daizenshuu 4.
Only Dragon Clan Namekians can create and control Dragon Balls. When Piccolo(Warrior Type) fuses with God(Dragon Clan) he doesn't become a Dragon Clan member. Since Piccolo is used as the base of the fusion, he is still a warrior type post fusion, which is also why the other sets of balls become inert and they have to bring Dende in, because Piccolo(merged with God) simply can't create or reactivate Dragon Balls.

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6411
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Cipher » Tue Aug 09, 2011 12:07 pm

So, GT gives one explanation, the Daizenshuu gives another?

I'll go with GT's since, you know, the Daizenshuu information was never actually stated in Z, and you kind of have to take the word of the series before guidebooks. Consider it a retcon, if anything.

For that matter, when Piccolo merges with God in Z, the other characters just kid of take it at face value that the Dragon Balls with disappear. They certainly don't know anything about the ins-and-outs of Namekian clans. So they must be assuming, as any reader/viewer would, that the Dragon Balls simply disappear because God "dies." He ceases to be a person on his own; loses his body. That Daizenshuu explanation is really weird and extraneous, considering the characters already make an assumption that the series never contradicts.

User avatar
Fox666
I Live Here
Posts: 4343
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Fox666 » Tue Aug 09, 2011 12:30 pm

Cipher wrote:What are the actual plot holes?
It's not because you can explain something that it is not a plot-hole.

In the original manga, Trunks warns about no.19 and 20, and later says he never saw them and he was mention no.17 and 18. I can explain this inconsistency by saying that Trunks come back to the past, eliminated no.19 and 20 and now his future is different with other androids. Bam! There is no plot-hole at all!

You can virtually explain anything.
Cipher wrote:
Fox666 wrote:• Nobody is supposed to get to Kami-sama temple without permission, however Pilaf & co get there.
Same way Bulma flies up there in the Cell arc? Dende and Popo are distracted by Goku and Oob's fight; Pilaf even comments on the fact that it's their one chance to sneak in. What's wrong with this? They explicitly address the fact that there's a distraction.
Bulma was given permission to go there. However, it's unlikely that Pilaf would be able to go there.

The "distraction" only means they have gone there unoticed (like entering in a castle without the guards seeing you). That's different of giving an explanation of why they can enter Kami-sama dimension.
Cipher wrote:
• Why the radar never picked these hidden Dragon Balls before, if supposedly they can do it even on space?
If Pilaf can block a Dragon Radar with a lead box, it's actually one or three steps less ridiculous to believe the magical depths of God's palace could do the same.
In the manga they had the radar even while they were in the temple of Kami-sama, that would have picked anything in that dimension.
Cipher wrote:
• How can these Dragon Balls they exist if the child of Kakatz is not "alive" anymore?
I couldn't point you to a specific scene right now, but if I recall correctly, the series is pretty explicit with the idea that the Ultimate Dragon Balls "reactivated" when God and Piccolo merged in the Cell arc. Makes sense, as it's basically the return of the original spirit before it split. So they were made by the original, unseparated "child of Katatz," turned to stone when he split into God and Piccolo, and then reactivated when they united again.
I don't remember such a thing being mentioned, but I could be wrong.
Cipher wrote:
• Why nobody ever mentioned these new Dragon Balls before? Why they needed to travel to namek to search for the namekian Dragon Balls?
Because they didn't exist in the Namek arc. They would still have been deactivated. It's also possible they were forgotten even by God/Piccolo.
Namek is only an example. There is moments in the Cell of Majin Boo saga which they needed the Dragon Balls.
Cipher wrote:
Androids having Ki?
There is kind of an error with this, but not the way you think. You're probably referring to the scene where Trunks says No. 17 has ki similar to No. 18. The androids were once humans and are still mostly organic. It's not unthinkable that they have ki. It's just a normal human amount of ki. Enough to sense at close distances and if you're familiar with the person, but not enough to say, search out among an entire planet or city.
Since Goku could track Bulma Ki, shouldn't they still be able to track no.17 and 18 in the Cell saga if they had the Ki of a normal human?

Besides, they contantly referred to the androids as not having Ki and etc. Wouldn't they have mentioned they only had the Ki of an average human instead of saying they don't have Ki at all? Or better than that, wouldn't they have noticed no.17 and 18 are different from the other complete lifeless machines?
Cipher wrote:The actual plot hole with this is Super Saiyan 4 Goku using teleportation to get near Super 17 during their fight, as he didn't seem to be able to just teleport to the androids back in the Cell arc. Then again, even this may not be a plot hole. We know Goku can teleport toward normal, human amounts of ki. He does so to get to Bulma and others several times. When 19 and 20 show up in Z, he obviously doesn't know what ki to search for until he meets them, and then he's knocked out by the heart virus. By the time they need to find 17 and 18 to stop Cell from becoming complete, Goku has never been near either of them, so finding their tiny ki to teleport to is out of the question. So this is really the first time Goku has even had the opportunity or necessity to teleport to an android. So, yeah, even this is excusable.
Then Cell would have absorbed no.17 and 18 before he noticed Piccolo was fighting one of them...

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7976
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by dbgtFO » Tue Aug 09, 2011 12:40 pm

Cipher wrote:So, GT gives one explanation, the Daizenshuu gives another?

I'll go with GT's since, you know, the Daizenshuu information was never actually stated in Z, and you kind of have to take the word of the series before guidebooks. Consider it a retcon, if anything.
Sure whatever. It wouldn't surprise me if they said something more on the subject in one of the Perfect Files.
That Daizenshuu explanation is really weird and extraneous,[...]
What, that only Dragon Clan Namekians can create Dragon Balls and stuff? It seems to be in line with what we do know from the series: Piccolo is a warrior type Namekian(stated after Dende healed him), Piccolo before and after merging with God seemingly can't create Dragon Balls(or at least he doesn't consider the possibility), which is where Dende comes in. Dende is a gifted Dragon Clan member and he can create Dragon Balls or reactivate old ones.
Fox666 wrote: Besides, they contantly referred to the androids as not having Ki and etc. Wouldn't they have mentioned they only had the Ki of an average human instead of saying they don't have Ki at all? Or better than that, wouldn't they have noticed no.17 and 18 are different from the other complete lifeless machines?
Yeah:
Chapter: 364 (DBZ 170), P10.1
Vegeta: “One of those guys with mysterious, absurdly large battle powers has vanished…But the other one remains…It’s not No.17 or the other androids. They don’t give off any presence at all…W-who the hell is it…!?”

User avatar
Savage68
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1929
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:16 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Savage68 » Tue Aug 09, 2011 12:44 pm

Fox666 wrote:It's not because you can explain something that it is not a plot-hole.
Yes it is. That's what distinguishes a simple inconsistency from a full-fledged plot hole; if it has any plausible explanation at all, it's not a hole in the plot. It could maybe be chalked up to sloppy writing or lack of exposition or whatever.

User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Nex Carnifex » Tue Aug 09, 2011 2:56 pm

dbgtFO wrote:
Cipher wrote:So, GT gives one explanation, the Daizenshuu gives another?

I'll go with GT's since, you know, the Daizenshuu information was never actually stated in Z, and you kind of have to take the word of the series before guidebooks. Consider it a retcon, if anything.
Sure whatever. It wouldn't surprise me if they said something more on the subject in one of the Perfect Files.
That Daizenshuu explanation is really weird and extraneous,[...]
What, that only Dragon Clan Namekians can create Dragon Balls and stuff? It seems to be in line with what we do know from the series: Piccolo is a warrior type Namekian(stated after Dende healed him), Piccolo before and after merging with God seemingly can't create Dragon Balls(or at least he doesn't consider the possibility), which is where Dende comes in. Dende is a gifted Dragon Clan member and he can create Dragon Balls or reactivate old ones.
Fox666 wrote: Besides, they contantly referred to the androids as not having Ki and etc. Wouldn't they have mentioned they only had the Ki of an average human instead of saying they don't have Ki at all? Or better than that, wouldn't they have noticed no.17 and 18 are different from the other complete lifeless machines?
Yeah:
Chapter: 364 (DBZ 170), P10.1
Vegeta: “One of those guys with mysterious, absurdly large battle powers has vanished…But the other one remains…It’s not No.17 or the other androids. They don’t give off any presence at all…W-who the hell is it…!?”
What translation is that from? Is it the Viz one?

User avatar
Fox666
I Live Here
Posts: 4343
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Fox666 » Tue Aug 09, 2011 3:29 pm

That's from Herms' translations.
Savage68 wrote:
Fox666 wrote:It's not because you can explain something that it is not a plot-hole.
Yes it is. That's what distinguishes a simple inconsistency from a full-fledged plot hole; if it has any plausible explanation at all, it's not a hole in the plot. It could maybe be chalked up to sloppy writing or lack of exposition or whatever.
If that was the case plot-holes won't exist. Because you can explain anything. Especially if you rely on fanfiction to explain.

And I can be very lazy and just say "a wizard did it" whenever I see a plot-hole... does that makes it not a plot-hole?

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Herms » Tue Aug 09, 2011 6:44 pm

dbgtFO wrote:I think there actually might be a plothole here, at least going by what we know from the previous series and Daizenshuu 4.
Only Dragon Clan Namekians can create and control Dragon Balls.
Well, all Daizenshuu 4 says is that Dragon Clan Namekians are the only ones who can create dragonballs (which is said in the manga anyway). It doesn't say anything about what happens to the dragonballs a Dragon Clan member creates if they later become a different type of Namekian via splitting up, merging, and whatnot.
Cipher wrote:I couldn't point you to a specific scene right now, but if I recall correctly, the series is pretty explicit with the idea that the Ultimate Dragon Balls "reactivated" when God and Piccolo merged in the Cell arc.
That's pretty much what Pilaf explains to Shu and Mai in the first episode.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

User avatar
Savage68
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1929
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:16 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Savage68 » Tue Aug 09, 2011 6:52 pm

Fox666 wrote:If that was the case plot-holes won't exist. Because you can explain anything.
Not with a plausible explanation you can't, which was the point I was trying to get across.

User avatar
Travis Touchdown
Regular
Posts: 734
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 6:14 pm
Contact:

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Travis Touchdown » Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:43 pm

Fox666 wrote:
Bulma was given permission to go there. However, it's unlikely that Pilaf would be able to go there.
Super Buu wasn't given permission though. He just flew up there.
"Hey girlfriend, why don't you throw a few more punches? Afraid you might break a nail or somethin?"
Ken - Street Fighter II

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Tue Aug 09, 2011 8:20 pm

Travis Touchdown wrote:Super Buu wasn't given permission though. He just flew up there.
They couldn't have prevented that even if they wanted to...None of their attacks would have phased him, and I honestly can't see Dende or Popo walking over and trying to explain that he isn't welcome there (well, maybe Abridged Popo could).
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Nex Carnifex » Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:07 pm

Chapter: 364 (DBZ 170), P10.1
Vegeta: “One of those guys with mysterious, absurdly large battle powers has vanished…But the other one remains…It’s not No.17 or the other androids. They don’t give off any presence at all…W-who the hell is it…!?”

What translation is this?

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Herms » Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:33 pm

Cipher wrote:The actual plot hole with this is Super Saiyan 4 Goku using teleportation to get near Super 17 during their fight, as he didn't seem to be able to just teleport to the androids back in the Cell arc.
Super 17's supposed to be part Machine Mutant too, and the Machine Mutant Rilld had sensible ki (as we see in that infamous line where Goku compares his ki to Boo's). So maybe Super 17 had sensible ki, even though regular 17 didn't.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

User avatar
Savage68
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1929
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:16 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Savage68 » Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:28 pm

Goku commented on the Sigma Force's "amazing" ki very early on in the series, too. It's not really hard for me to believe that just maybe the GT cast's ki-sensing abilities simply improved since Z.

User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: Is GT really inconsistent?

Post by Nex Carnifex » Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:37 pm

I just don't know why Goku is so weak and dumb all of a sudden, he was getting beaten up by space worms and some other stupid things. Everything seems forced, its like everyone they encounter, no matter how random, just HAPPENS to be a good match for them even though they keep getting stronger. It makes me wonder, if GT, or any of Dragon Ball for that matter, happened a little out of order, the characters would get pwned early on. This is just amplified in GT though, it's like now there just happens to be a super scientist that just shows up out of nowhere that could have raped them iwith his robots f he came during Z.

Post Reply