What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Nex Carnifex » Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:37 pm

Besides the manga, what other Dragon Ball media do you consider when thinking of the Dragon Ball universe? Like, what movies do you consider "real" in a fictional tense, do you consider GT part of the actual canon timeline, the specials, filler? Personally I want to accept GT since I like the characters but it just doesn't make much sense as the end of Dragon Ball IMO.

smiley
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 5:09 pm

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by smiley » Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:26 pm

The manga is canon to the manga, anime to the anime (and GT to the anime), and probably at least some movies to the anime. The anime/GT are obviously not canon to the manga.

User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Nex Carnifex » Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:31 pm

tsss no that is not what I meant, like WHAT do you consider to be true when you think of it. Like if you made a wish to be transported to the Dragon Ball world, would you think GT would actually come after Z or no?

User avatar
Chibi Gohan
Regular
Posts: 575
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:31 am
Location: Florida

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Chibi Gohan » Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:50 pm

Nex Carnifex wrote:tsss no that is not what I meant, like WHAT do you consider to be true when you think of it. Like if you made a wish to be transported to the Dragon Ball world, would you think GT would actually come after Z or no?
GT certainly wouldn't come after Z... plot hole city.

As for what's "true", I like to take the "multiverse" prospective, which would mean the manga and anime exist within in the same universe (with exception to some filler material), while the movies exist in a different Dragon Ball universe.
I have a Dragon Ball collection of sorts which can be seen here.

User avatar
Kendamu
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 7000
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:31 am
Location: The Martial Arts World

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Kendamu » Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:58 pm

"Everything is canon, but it doesn't exist in the same universe."

Here's my personal outlook:

- The manga happened.
- The JSAT happened.
- Some of the Gohan training filler from the Saiyan Arc happened.
- The driving episode happened.
- Trunks fooling with the timeline caused TFS DBZ Abridged to happen.
Last edited by Kendamu on Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Nex Carnifex » Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:59 pm

So you don't consider Goku's final transformation to be SS4 just SS3 right?

User avatar
Kendamu
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 7000
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:31 am
Location: The Martial Arts World

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Kendamu » Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:01 am

Nex Carnifex wrote:So you don't consider Goku's final transformation to be SS4 just SS3 right?
I'd say that's pretty obvious.

User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Nex Carnifex » Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:07 am

Kendamu wrote:
Nex Carnifex wrote:So you don't consider Goku's final transformation to be SS4 just SS3 right?
I'd say that's pretty obvious.
But Akira designed it, I just feel it was meant to be, or maybe not...I wish Akira would come out and say if it was real or not...

User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Nex Carnifex » Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:14 am

I feel GT started out completely and utterly wrong and nonsensical in terms of Dragon Ball. To many random characters were showing up stronger than Kid Buu that were just to convenient to drive the story forward, no more acrobatic plot devices like Dragon Ball had, it was just OMG, it just so happens that a bunch of super strong fighters just show up which if they had earlier would have killed us all instantly, good thing we've had constant challenges all our lives up until this point so we could be exactly at their power level to provide an even challenge. That I find hard to accept, but later GT got good when Akira started helping do to it's unpopularity. It's just that if you accept part of GT, you need to accept the whole thing, that's why I wish they made a manga for it and corrected all the retardation like Rildo, the worms, the dancing guys, and pretty much everything until Baby. And then refined that. Maybe a fan will do it one day, and Akira will like it better or something and say its canon. Yeah I kind of take it seriously, I really love thinking about the character's progression of power it's like I'm somewhat insane in that way.

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Herms » Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:15 am

Nex Carnifex wrote:But Akira designed it, I just feel it was meant to be, or maybe not...I wish Akira would come out and say if it was real or not...
Toriyama did not design Super Saiyan 4. That was done by anime character designer Katsuyoshi Nakatsuru.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

User avatar
Chibi Gohan
Regular
Posts: 575
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:31 am
Location: Florida

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Chibi Gohan » Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:16 am

Nex Carnifex wrote:
Kendamu wrote:
Nex Carnifex wrote:So you don't consider Goku's final transformation to be SS4 just SS3 right?
I'd say that's pretty obvious.
But Akira designed it, I just feel it was meant to be, or maybe not...I wish Akira would come out and say if it was real or not...
It's not like it didn't happen....... GT just doesn't exist same universe that the manga happened in.
I have a Dragon Ball collection of sorts which can be seen here.

User avatar
Bussani
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8041
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:35 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Bussani » Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:17 am

Nex Carnifex wrote:But Akira designed it
No he didn't. Katsuyoshi Nakatsuru was the one who designed Super Saiyan 4.

Also, you're on a first name basis with the man, huh?

Edit: Beat me to it!
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!

User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Nex Carnifex » Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:23 am

You know what I think, I think that GT happened, but since it is only done in Anime form it is only canon to the Anime. BUT, since it isn't in manga form then I can assume that the manga form would not contain the inconsistencies that the anime version contained just like the anime version of Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z are much more inconsistent than the manga. So GT's main plot can just be taken and cleaned of things like low end feats when being reimagined in manga form. Or does that sound ridiculous...

User avatar
DBZ Mick
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 1:38 am
Location: Australia

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by DBZ Mick » Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:33 am

The manga is the main canon.

The anime has it's own canon in which I include CERTAIN filler.

I guess one could say GT is the sequel to the anime of DBZ, not sure how I'd see it though.
It is in his character to be rude and a bit crass. He's a hick, with no formal education. That is Son Goku. That is who he is.

Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.

-DemonRin

User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Nex Carnifex » Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:35 am

Well these are questions ever tru dragon ball fan needs to answer one day

User avatar
MetaMoss
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 614
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon area

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by MetaMoss » Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:52 am

Nex Carnifex wrote:Well these are questions ever tru dragon ball fan needs to answer one day
Not really, people can take DB just to be a story and not fret over continuity.

But to answer your question: I think the manga continuity is seperate from the anime's (which I think includes GT).

I think a minimal amount of filler happened in the manga universe, for example Gregory. I also think movie 9 happened, mainly because it doesn't contradict much at all. The JSAT special happens too, and after that Dragon Ball Online. I guess that's it.
"Perfect" is the enemy of the good. True for Cell and true for real life.
Don't forget to slow down and enjoy yourself.

User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Nex Carnifex » Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:02 am

metamoss wrote:
Nex Carnifex wrote:Well these are questions ever tru dragon ball fan needs to answer one day
Not really, people can take DB just to be a story and not fret over continuity.

But to answer your question: I think the manga continuity is seperate from the anime's (which I think includes GT).

I think a minimal amount of filler happened in the manga universe, for example Gregory. I also think movie 9 happened, mainly because it doesn't contradict much at all. The JSAT special happens too, and after that Dragon Ball Online. I guess that's it.
Dragon Ball Online? Really? It seems pretty ridiculous to me.

User avatar
DBZ Mick
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 1:38 am
Location: Australia

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by DBZ Mick » Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:05 am

Nex Carnifex wrote:Well these are questions ever tru dragon ball fan needs to answer one day
Hardly. It's just a damn manga/anime series, you should enjoy it in the way you see fit to.
It is in his character to be rude and a bit crass. He's a hick, with no formal education. That is Son Goku. That is who he is.

Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.

-DemonRin

User avatar
Nex Carnifex
Banned
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by Nex Carnifex » Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:14 am

DBZ Mick wrote:
Nex Carnifex wrote:Well these are questions ever tru dragon ball fan needs to answer one day
Hardly. It's just a damn manga/anime series, you should enjoy it in the way you see fit to.
no, u gotta make a decision or else you a poser

nathantheguitarist
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1519
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:37 am

Re: What Dragon Ball media do you consider canon

Post by nathantheguitarist » Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:30 am

I consider bootleg toys to be the one true canon.
In a ditch somewhere

Post Reply