RandomGuy96 wrote:That still doesn't explain basic things like Goku tanking a punch to the face from the same guy who defeated Gohan with a light smack of his tail.
If the base Saiyans can fight with #13, #14, and #15, who are slightly below the Super Saiyans, if base Gohan can fight wit SS Goten, and if base Goku can beat non-serious SS Gohan & Goten, the SS3 Goku can take the hits of the much stronger than him Hildegarn. Like I've said, Toei doesn't follow the same logic with the manga's logic in their own content (filler, movies, specials, GT).
VegettoEX wrote:DBZGTKOSDH wrote:Well, Toei is a company, not a person. We don't know if the statement about Janenba > Hildegarn was made by the writer of the movie.
You really don't need to explain the production of the movies to me of all people

.
Yeah yeah, I know.
VegettoEX wrote:So what would it take for you to be OK with it? Would it have to be the writer? The director? The producer?
Who does it take, and how much, for you to believe something? It was stated on a website. What if it was also stated in an interview? In a guide book? In the movie pamphlet? But never in the movie itself? What would it take? Would it ever matter?
It depends on the source. While it may be an official source, it doesn't always make it correct. Guidebooks like the Daizenshuu are mostly correct, but they still have some mistakes, and there are sources that have just wrong things, like RandomGuy96 has already said. And I find most of the official BP (minus the manga ones) questionable.
VegettoEX wrote:Yusuke Watanabe says "Birusu" is a pun on one thing, Toriyama thought something else, and the overall production company behind the movie says something else, too. So which is it? Who do you believe? Which is it? Which is the truth?
This is a complicated issue here. I take Beerus because it combines both intended puns.
VegettoEX wrote:Is the original ending to the manga the "real" one, or is the updated kanzenban ending? Toriyama personally drew them both. So which is it?
The latest one, because it shows the author's latest vision of the series.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.