Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20409
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Skippack, PA
- Contact:
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
Given what we've heard before it would seem as though it's not a merit based system, but more of a caste. Once a lower class warrior, you're always considered lower class.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
Maybe. But there goes Toriyama saying promotion can happen.
-
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4384
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:09 am
- Location: Houston, Texas
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
Vegeta’s PL was 18,000, and if I recall, he was acknowledged as being the strongest and most gifted Saiyan to serve Freeza. Whatever King Vegeta’s PL was, it seems like it would’ve been lower than 18,000.Grimlock wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 9:29 pm With a power level close to ten thousand, he probably shouldn't be a low-class warrior, but we don't know if he rivaled King Vegeta. We never knew what was his power level.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:51 pm
- Location: US
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
I thought the 10,000 thing was just supposed to be a parallel to Goku. A low-level warrior exceeding expectations to become more powerful. Bardock is another Goku analogue.
All we know about King Vegeta is that Vegeta had already surpassed him when he was still a child.
All we know about King Vegeta is that Vegeta had already surpassed him when he was still a child.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:27 pm
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
You just keep repeating the same debunked arguments over and over again.SSJgogeto wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 7:32 pm Can't really agree with that. The way I see is that Bardock is special, but even then he isn't powerful enough.
About the rest, let's see: IMO Bardock is special, and also he is the only character who have the "I can see the future" power (besides the Kanassans). I don't think these treats together make sense, and I think my argument makes sense, so I don't see it as a fallacy. Also, I told that Bardock won't fit entirely in that category and I don't think your opinion about the "false concept" is necessarily true.
The "see into the future" power isnt even that special of an ability if it can so easily be passed around. Its just as dumb as calling Goku a Mary Sue for being the only character (let alone Saiyan) shown to use Kaioken.
-
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4384
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:09 am
- Location: Houston, Texas
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
That still makes you wonder why Bardock viewed Goku as a weakling with no promise.MyVisionity wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 9:47 pm I thought the 10,000 thing was just supposed to be a parallel to Goku. A low-level warrior exceeding expectations to become more powerful. Bardock is another Goku analogue.
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
Powerful characters with fast learning there are many in Dragon ball but that is not the concept of mary sue thing that people mistakenly classify them ... because they simply do not know what it means or use it out of ignoranceCure Dragon 255 wrote: Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:58 pm I dont think anyone can actually qualify as a sue seen as it is a meaningless sexist buzzword. But I would like to see what YOU think.
mary sue ... is a character that wins all the time, everything works out for him and that everyone likes him for no reason usually some representations of superman would qualify as that maybe Molly Wright (Men in Black: International)
but no ... inconsistent or not, someone be powerful doesn't make you mary sue
I have said that Merus can be classified as Mary Sue but not by power if not because everything has turned out perfect to him ... without errors, defeats or losses of any kind ... and he was not even punished for disobeying the angels ... Of course, that can change, but now it is.
- goku the krump dancer
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3661
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:34 pm
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
Eeeh I dont know man, seems like a super reach to me. Mostly because nothing was mentioned in universe about Zamasu being "different" after Vegetto defuses.Fionordequester wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 7:44 pmActually, believe it or not, there is. It's ridiculously subtle (to the point it may've been an accident), and exists only in the Japanese version... But it's there.goku the krump dancer wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:19 am As much as I hate to say it, there’s nothing that indicates Vegetto did any real damage to Zamasu during that fight.
Basically, Fused Zamasu loses the voice filter after being hit by the Big Bang Kamehameha. Literally his very next line ("Behold! This is a god!") has him talking in his normal, unmodified voice. He then goes the rest of the episode with his unmodified voice, except for one brief moment where both he & Trunks get it.
You can read all about that, here: viewtopic.php?t=36633
At least in the manga Zamasu looked like he was losing and actually feeling pain, which is consistent with what immortality is, you wont die but you,re not impervious to pain.
It's not too late. One day, it will be.
Peace And Power MF DOOM!
Peace and Power Kevin Samuels
Peace And Power MF DOOM!
Peace and Power Kevin Samuels
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
And I'll keep doing that because I don't think they are debunked. So we can keep this discussion for the next days or just agree to disagree. With that said:Sadala Elite wrote:You just keep repeating the same debunked arguments over and over again.
Nah, Kaioken can be learned, and it's a different context.Sadala Elite wrote:The "see into the future" power isnt even that special of an ability if it can so easily be passed around. Its just as dumb as calling Goku a Mary Sue for being the only character (let alone Saiyan) shown to use Kaioken.
That's a good point.WittyUsername wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 7:54 pmIf anything, I’d argue that Toriyama’s Bardock is more “special” than the old Bardock. Toriyama’s Bardock was not only the only Saiyan to figure out Freeza’s plans, but he did so entirely on his own. Toei’s Bardock literally had to be told about Freeza wanting to kill the Saiyans, but Toriyama’s version was apparently the only Saiyan smart enough to figure it out on his own. Plus, he is the reason Goku gets sent to Earth, which makes him a much more important character in the story than the old Bardock. With the old Bardock, his importance to the story literally begins and ends with “he impregnated some woman to make Goku.”
I think both are special but in different ways. The old Bardock is special due to his "gifts", and the canon Bardock is special because of his mind and intelect. But the thing is, while I can see why the new Bardock needs to be like that, IMO all these "gifts" that the old Bardock have are unnecessary, and with some arrangements the whole special could be made without them.
- It_Is_Ayna_You_Flips
- Regular
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2020 7:16 pm
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
People are little too hung up on the "always wins" thing. Character roles are a group of traits and not every single box has to be ticked. A character is a main character even if they are not the most important character to the story and an antagonist is an antagonist even if they're in the moral right. A Mary Sue doesn't need every little thing to go their way to be a Mary Sue.
But the real reason probably has to do with the writers wanting to keep Bardock as amoral as possible to emphasis that, as much as he may look like Goku, this is not Goku. Bardock doesn't see the potential in people and he wouldn't know how to bring it out even if he did.
I think the in character explanation is that Bardock's visions showed Goku fighting Freeza so to him young Kakarott must be exceptional. Becoming great seems to be an almost alien concept to Saiyans when they're introduced.WittyUsername wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:13 pmThat still makes you wonder why Bardock viewed Goku as a weakling with no promise.MyVisionity wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 9:47 pm I thought the 10,000 thing was just supposed to be a parallel to Goku. A low-level warrior exceeding expectations to become more powerful. Bardock is another Goku analogue.
But the real reason probably has to do with the writers wanting to keep Bardock as amoral as possible to emphasis that, as much as he may look like Goku, this is not Goku. Bardock doesn't see the potential in people and he wouldn't know how to bring it out even if he did.
My opinions suck. You should probably mute me to spare yourself having to see them.
"If someone gets Star Wars wrong? Death threats. If a kid learns that a shitty song they liked when they were 12 was a cover of a song made in 1984? Death threats. If someone makes a Sonic game that's too dark and edgy? Death threats. If someone makes a Sonic game that isn't too dark and edgy? Death threats. If someone criticizes Naruto? Lots of death threats. Sexualizes pokemon? UNIVERSAL PRAISE." - Plague of Gripes
"If someone gets Star Wars wrong? Death threats. If a kid learns that a shitty song they liked when they were 12 was a cover of a song made in 1984? Death threats. If someone makes a Sonic game that's too dark and edgy? Death threats. If someone makes a Sonic game that isn't too dark and edgy? Death threats. If someone criticizes Naruto? Lots of death threats. Sexualizes pokemon? UNIVERSAL PRAISE." - Plague of Gripes
- SupremeKai25
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
Very nice catch, I never noticed it!Fionordequester wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 7:44 pmActually, believe it or not, there is. It's ridiculously subtle (to the point it may've been an accident), and exists only in the Japanese version... But it's there.goku the krump dancer wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:19 am As much as I hate to say it, there’s nothing that indicates Vegetto did any real damage to Zamasu during that fight.
Basically, Fused Zamasu loses the voice filter after being hit by the Big Bang Kamehameha. Literally his very next line ("Behold! This is a god!") has him talking in his normal, unmodified voice. He then goes the rest of the episode with his unmodified voice, except for one brief moment where both he & Trunks get it.
You can read all about that, here: viewtopic.php?t=36633
That arc surprisingly had a lot of very small and original details, so it was probably intentional.
Akira Toriyama, DBS vol.4 joint interview with ToyotaroAt his core Zamasu is good like Shin, though I guess you could say he was so fastidious that it backfired. But you know, for this "Future Trunks Arc" you had to depict Zamasu and Trunks' inner conflict, right? If this was back when I was drawing the manga myself then I doubt if I could have done it. I mean, I'm not very good at depicting the characters' psychology on the page. So this all came together because now I only have to think up the story. [...] On my own, I doubt I would have been able to express Zamasu's fall to the dark side.
- Fionordequester
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:33 pm
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
Remember, though; It's Japanese only. As Gokukrump said, it may just have been carelessness.SupremeKai25 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 2:47 am Very nice catch, I never noticed it!
That arc surprisingly had a lot of very small and original details, so it was probably intentional.
The timing of it is really interesting though. Plus, it'd explain why Infinite Zamasu was made up entirely of unfused Zamasu faces.
Kataphrut wrote:It's a bit of a Boy Who Cried Wolf situation to me...Basically, the boy shouldn't have cried wolf when the wolves just wanted to Go See Yamcha. If not, they might have gotten some help when the wolves came back to Make the Donuts.
Chuquita wrote:I liken Gokû Black to "guy can't stand his job, so instead of quitting and finding a job he likes, he instead sets fire not only to his workplace so he doesn't have to work there, but tries setting fire to every store in the franchise of that company".
- SupremeKai25
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
Yeah, I actually remember reading a similar theory which said that he lost the echo filter after he got hit by Goku's kamehameha, which basically "killed" Goku Black, so to say (hence why he no longer had two Zamasu voices overlapping each others).Fionordequester wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:02 amRemember, though; It's Japanese only. As Gokukrump said, it may just have been carelessness.SupremeKai25 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 2:47 am Very nice catch, I never noticed it!
That arc surprisingly had a lot of very small and original details, so it was probably intentional.
The timing of it is really interesting though. Plus, it'd explain why Infinite Zamasu was made up entirely of unfused Zamasu faces.
That being said dub supports that theory too. In ep. 65 most of Fused Zamasu's lines had that deep echo voice filter, but in ep. 66 I did not hear any echo ever after he became Corrupted.
Akira Toriyama, DBS vol.4 joint interview with ToyotaroAt his core Zamasu is good like Shin, though I guess you could say he was so fastidious that it backfired. But you know, for this "Future Trunks Arc" you had to depict Zamasu and Trunks' inner conflict, right? If this was back when I was drawing the manga myself then I doubt if I could have done it. I mean, I'm not very good at depicting the characters' psychology on the page. So this all came together because now I only have to think up the story. [...] On my own, I doubt I would have been able to express Zamasu's fall to the dark side.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:27 pm
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
- The "see into the future" powers are also learned. In fact, they are apparently easier to learn and pass on than Kaioken, so your argument doesn't work because there's nothing "special" about Bardock having it.SSJgogeto wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 12:35 amAnd I'll keep doing that because I don't think they are debunked. So we can keep this discussion for the next days or just agree to disagree. With that said:Sadala Elite wrote:You just keep repeating the same debunked arguments over and over again.
Nah, Kaioken can be learned, and it's a different context.Sadala Elite wrote:The "see into the future" power isnt even that special of an ability if it can so easily be passed around. Its just as dumb as calling Goku a Mary Sue for being the only character (let alone Saiyan) shown to use Kaioken.
That's a good point.WittyUsername wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 7:54 pmIf anything, I’d argue that Toriyama’s Bardock is more “special” than the old Bardock. Toriyama’s Bardock was not only the only Saiyan to figure out Freeza’s plans, but he did so entirely on his own. Toei’s Bardock literally had to be told about Freeza wanting to kill the Saiyans, but Toriyama’s version was apparently the only Saiyan smart enough to figure it out on his own. Plus, he is the reason Goku gets sent to Earth, which makes him a much more important character in the story than the old Bardock. With the old Bardock, his importance to the story literally begins and ends with “he impregnated some woman to make Goku.”
I think both are special but in different ways. The old Bardock is special due to his "gifts", and the canon Bardock is special because of his mind and intelect. But the thing is, while I can see why the new Bardock needs to be like that, IMO all these "gifts" that the old Bardock have are unnecessary, and with some arrangements the whole special could be made without them.
If being "special" makes one a Mary Sue then Goku is the biggest one in the franchise.
- The entire narrative function of the future-seeing powers is to play up the tragedy and futitly of Bardock's efforts (which isn't something that happens to Sues). The 90s movie would not be better without it.
- New Bardock apparently being the only Saiyan who ever considered the possibly of Freeza wiping them out is ridiculous. Back In Z, King Vegeta and some others also considered this and even started a rebellion before Bardock did. It makes no sense why they didn't in the new Broly film.
- The PL 10,000 with 90s Bardock was explained in the movie as a recent Zenkai. It wasnt something he always had for no reason.
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
So you have chosen death... well, ok then. Let's see:
Even if the technique can be learned and you're not make fanfictions the argument persists because the technique was forcilly passed to Bardock, he didn't learned it naturally. About Goku, well, you're saying it, not me. In your third sentence I essentialy disagree with pratically everything, and in your fourth you are just supposing that King Vegeta did nothing when we know little about what exactly happened in the movie. And I still think that Bardock's zenkai is too much.
Even if the technique can be learned and you're not make fanfictions the argument persists because the technique was forcilly passed to Bardock, he didn't learned it naturally. About Goku, well, you're saying it, not me. In your third sentence I essentialy disagree with pratically everything, and in your fourth you are just supposing that King Vegeta did nothing when we know little about what exactly happened in the movie. And I still think that Bardock's zenkai is too much.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:27 pm
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
- That's a stupid argument, because Bardock still got the ability in a way that literally anyone could get it, not a way that makes him special.SSJgogeto wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 5:18 pm So you have chosen death... well, ok then. Let's see:
Even if the technique can be learned and you're not make fanfictions the argument persists because the technique was forcilly passed to Bardock, he didn't learned it naturally. About Goku, well, you're saying it, not me. In your third sentence I essentialy disagree with pratically everything, and in your fourth you are just supposing that King Vegeta did nothing when we know little about what exactly happened in the movie. And I still think that Bardock's zenkai is too much.
- Its a legit point about Goku
- So you can't prove it wrong?
- The DBS Broly film never even hints at King Vegeta turning against Freeza, but in the Z version we actually see King Vegeta go against Freeza.
- We dont know what Bardock's PL was before the Zenkai, so you can't say if it was too big or not.
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
What good did the 10, 000 battle power do Bardock? He was no threat to Freeza at all and was still vastly weaker than Zarbon and Dodoria. Nothing about that Battle Power, from what I recall, was framed as special by the narrative. It just felt like Toei throwing a random number that sounded good at the time. They could have given him a Battle Power of like 3000 and it wouldn’t have changed anything in the story.
He only knew what was going to happen because of the clairvoyant abilities forced on him. Not because he was smarter than the other Saiyans.
Not one single aspect of his character comes remotely close to Gary Stu territory (ignoring Episode of Bardock of course)
He only knew what was going to happen because of the clairvoyant abilities forced on him. Not because he was smarter than the other Saiyans.
Not one single aspect of his character comes remotely close to Gary Stu territory (ignoring Episode of Bardock of course)
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
But that the thing, anyone could have the ability but who have it in the end? Bardock. Also, again I said nothing about Goku, if you think that he is a Gary Stu, ok then. About your third sentence, actually I don't know if I can prove it wrong, it's just my opinion. About the film, again we don't know what happened, so we are in the realm of possibilities. And I can say the PL is too big, of course. He is(?) a low-class, so his PL was low before.Sadala Elite wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:36 pm- That's a stupid argument, because Bardock still got the ability in a way that literally anyone could get it, not a way that makes him special.
- Its a legit point about Goku
- So you can't prove it wrong?
- The DBS Broly film never even hints at King Vegeta turning against Freeza, but in the Z version we actually see King Vegeta go against Freeza.
- We dont know what Bardock's PL was before the Zenkai, so you can't say if it was too big or not.
...this is fun, I wonder how far this will go.
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
Because. It. Is. A. Story. About. Bardock.SSJgogeto wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:20 pmBut that the thing, anyone could have the ability but who have it in the end? Bardock.Sadala Elite wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:36 pm- That's a stupid argument, because Bardock still got the ability in a way that literally anyone could get it, not a way that makes him special.
- Its a legit point about Goku
- So you can't prove it wrong?
- The DBS Broly film never even hints at King Vegeta turning against Freeza, but in the Z version we actually see King Vegeta go against Freeza.
- We dont know what Bardock's PL was before the Zenkai, so you can't say if it was too big or not.
Re: Who is a Mary Sue in Drago Ball.
Yeah, so what?