Man, that's a lie, and the guy knows that! If that was true, why are there many western cultural references on the Saiyan-Frieza saga era(KND, Billy and Mandy, MAD), there's a few references of the Cell saga, but I still think it's a lie. I thought 55-65% of the whole fanbase thought DBZ went downhill after Frieza, even if they saw the Cell saga first. And I've seen some comments from people from the US say they watched the other sagas before and they STILL prefer the Cell saga. It may not have the same DB feeling(which, to me, it's good), but it definitely had a badass "Save the world" tone, which the Buu saga tried to copy, and for ONCE had sense of loss! Speaking of sense of loss, I wish Toriyama did the Shadow Dragon Saga, and you all know why.
The idiot who wrote:On the negative side, the show gets a bad rap for being solely about transforming into more powerful forms of Super Saiyan to combat enemies who, themselves, transform into more powerful forms to combat those Super Saiyan forms - something that was only a trend in the Android Saga.
Maybe, but I think the Frieza saga gave the show a more bad rep than the Cell saga, basically because of the final fight. If it wasn't like that, there wouldn't be jokes about how many episodes does it take for Goku to beat this guy. After all, Toonami started airing DBZ around 1998-1999, which was at Frieza, NOT Cell.
rereboy wrote:Its funny because I think its where Dragon Ball was at its weakest.
While I think that's where DB was at its strongest now. I used to think it was at its strongest at the Frieza saga, but after re-watching the saga in Kai a couple of times (on national TV..Nicktoons), not anymore. Maybe if Dr Gero didn't have a major character/saga connection with the Z warriors, then I'd agree with you or still disagree, by saying "DBZ was at its best at the Saiyan Saga" instead.