SupremeKai25 wrote: Sat Mar 08, 2025 5:38 am
The Monkey King wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 7:31 am
Not necessarily a "thing" but more of a trend.
The "Super" era of Dragon Ball has introduced so much shitty writing that now it's becoming a common sentiment that "
Dragon Ball always had bad writing" I've seen people say Super Saiyan was an asspull on par with Beast Gohan and downplay the effort Toriyama put in for 10 years straight during Dragon Ball's serialisation. All so modern Dragon Ball can look less embarrassing in comparison.
Uhm, Dragon Ball always had bad writing. There might be slightly more bad writing in Super, but are we seriously going to act like there was no bad writing in the Cell and Buu sagas?
If people want to talk about asspulls in DBZ, they bring up SSJ3, not SSJ1. You intentionally chose a bad example from the last saga of Dragon Ball that is generally agreed upon to be immaculate.
Step into the Cell and Buu sagas and you'll soon discover that people back in 2004-2010, before Super was the shining new punching bag, were far, far less compassionate to DBZ's writing faults.
How can this be a new trend when the Cell and Buu sagas were already getting criticized for their bad writing (rightfully so) long before Super? This is historical revisionism, plain and simple. I'm just going to post old threads from this forum
viewtopic.php?t=2100
viewtopic.php?t=11584
viewtopic.php?t=14355
viewtopic.php?t=12350
viewtopic.php?t=4319
viewtopic.php?t=15695
I must thank
Majin Buu for making two of these threads that you probably don't even remember. Those threads helped enlighten me about how fandoms work. There's so much nostalgia and rose-tinted goggles today when it comes to the Cell and Buu saga.
How enlightening it has been to reread these old threads. How thankful I am that the forum archived them, I suggest everyone read them. They contain everything: accusations that Buu is a lame villain for stealing his precessor's shtick of absorbing people, accusations that the Buu saga was just lazily thrown together because Toriyama lost his passion, accusations that the Buu saga was formulaic with people just getting new forms and fusing to make new toys, accusations of contradicting plot twists like Goku knowing a new form and yet never using it when he could've,
I mean, surely all these takes I reported ring a bell, yes? Times and takes never change, only punching bags do.
If people back in the 2000s were allowed to criticize the Cell and Buu sagas and say they had bad writing... why can't I? Why can't I say that Dragon Ball always had bad writing? Why must this position be mocked and ridiculed today as some kind of reactionary trend or whatever?
I don't understand why people in the 2000s could say that Dragon Ball has bad writing, but I can't in 2025.
I clicked those links, and almost all of them are in regards to the Buu saga. I've gone on record to say that arc is the granddaddy of "Modern DB," which is what inspired this thread 10 years ago.
I feel when people point out the "bad writing" of DBS, they are not referring to the same thing when they discuss the Cell saga. For example, the criticisms about the writing of the Cell saga boil down to really dumb character decisions in the plot itself, like Vegeta letting Cell go perfect, Krillin being a simp and not deactivating 18, Goku giving Cell a senzu bean, how out of character Gohan was to just stand there in panic while his friends were getting slaughtered by the Cell Jrs, etc. I've also read criticisms of Gohan's usage in the arc prior to the Cell Games. All of these arguments are made by adults overanalyzing a story made by a dude who admitted to having no attention to detail when it came to writing. Most DBZ fans acknowledge the flaws in the plot and dgaf because it was cool, consistent in what mattered, comparatively dark, and fun. It's a VERY small minority of DBZ fans that dislike this arc. And I do emphasize DBZ, not general DB fans, as they encompass the bulk of fans you hear talking shit about DBS.
With DBS, "bad writing" usually refers to creative and design choices many fans simply do not like. And most of this originates from the Buu saga. For example, Gohan not training, the SSJ transformation being relegated to a play thing by children, the tone shift that came with introducing a goofy villain and said kid SSJs, an oversaturation of transformations, etc. In DBS, you have a crap ton of recolor transformations, power scaling hell, tingly back sensations to become SSJs, Future Trunks with blue hair, Future Trunks' universe wiped out, Bardock not being DBZ's Bardock, weaker characters being as strong as the plot demands with off-screen training that is never elaborated on, Goku being a non-serious idiot almost all the time, and actual asspulls.
You mentioned SSJ3 being an asspull. It was, but only in the sense that it was unexpected. However, there was context to it: Goku had trained for 7 years in the afterlife, and if we take the filler into consideration, it was special training by a Kai that held a tournament to specifically train the winner. Additionally, SSJ3 was given a weakness Goku didn't consider because it was a form better suited while dead, there was a valid reason why he didn't use it against Vegeta, and it just looks EFFING COOL. In DBS, you have characters like Trunks getting angry and acquiring new forms with absolutely no explanation and lazy designs. In Daima, we're supposed to believe Goku just trained by himself off-screen for a few months to become a SSJ4, and then never used the form again. lol
So basically, "bad writing" in DBS = creative choices that retcon or have resulted in a change to the formula of the series pre-Buu, which don't bode well with fans of the Saiyan, Namek, and Cell sagas.