Earth without a sun:caejones wrote:Yakan lived on his planet. Living requires energy. Yakan's planet has energy, sun or no sun, light or no light.Yakon's planet has no energy.
Light energy is not the only kind of energy. In fact, light from the sun comes from nuclear fusion,which is started because of several other kinds of energy--gravity, for one. (If I get into the physics of nuclear fusion I'd probably say something stupid...).
Even if there is no light, there is a planet. Meaning there is matter that is held together gravitationally. Hence, energy. And Yakan lived ther. Hence, enough energy to sustain life at least temporarily.
Maybe a small amount of energy since there is no sunlight, but there decidedly *is* energy there. This question is pretty well undebatable, and yet...
In short DARK! Along with light comes heat. So very cold as well. Most
of the activity and life on earth are due to the energy from the Sun.
Without light, photosynthesis will not take place. Most plants cannot
grow. Every other living thing would be without food. Almost nothing
would survive if light were removed.
No Sun would mean not heat or any other radiated energy sufficient to
creat the movement of air and water as we know it. The Earth would be
frozen and likely not to have an atmosphere.
Without the Sun, the Earth would have not gravitational pull to a central
star... so would be in a totally different motion and relationship to the
rest of the universe.
Life on Earth without the sun would not exist.
Then, how did Yakon survive in his own planet since he only eats light?
I brought the moon argument to prove that Toriyama uses physics. What is it that you're trying to prove anyway by saying "if you recall, the moon was destroyed TWICE in Dragon Ball with no crazy side effects to the Earth at all."SonEric84 wrote:The only one pulling arguments out of nowhere is you. YOU'RE the one who brought the moon into this first, if you recall with your little excerpt from Toriyama's corner. So I didn't pull it out of nowhere, it was a counter-point. I never stated aircraft and machine gun bullets in DB were slower than normal. What is it that you're trying to prove anyway? I don't see what the point of going back and forth like this is. Debates are fine but at this point it just seems like you're being difficult.
Is it a counter-point to prove that Toriyama didn't use physics?






